terça-feira, 10 de fevereiro de 2009

Monica Zetterlund with Bill Evans Trio - "Waltz for Debby"

Bill Evans Trio - "Someday My Prince Will Come"

THELONIOUS MONK - "Blue Monk"

Maura O'Connell with Karen Matheson - "Down by the Salley Gardens" (1998)

"My Melancholy Baby"- Frank Sinatra

Duke Ellington - "Take the A Train" (Ella Fitzgerald)

Herbie Hancock - "Chameleon" (Live)

Bar é arte


Miguel Avataneo

Maidens

Oil Painting

Bar é poesia - Lya Luft


Lya Luft




Guardei-me para Ti




(Lya Luft)




Guardei-me para ti como um segredo

Que eu mesma não desvendei:

Há notas nesta guitarra que não toquei,

Há praias na minha ilha que nem andei.



É preciso que me tomes, além do riso e do olhar,

Naquilo que não conheço e adivinhei;

É preciso que me ensines a canção do que serei

E me cries com teu gesto

Que nem sonhei.

Bar é arte



Olga Gouskova

Silence

Acryl on canvas, sepil, pencil ( 2006 )

Bar é poesia - Angela Santos


Angela Santos


O acordar dos sentidos



(Angela Santos)




Emudecida,

ante a nudez da alma que o corpo espelha,

sigo os meus olhos

na busca de cada movimento, ou arquejo do peito

sigo o ouvido

atenta ao sussurro e ao suspiro

sigo a minha boca

em busca do sal de cada maré viva que sobe à orla do desejo

sigo as minhas mãos

que em cada esquina do teu corpo reencontram o tempo

que um dia foi de todos os sentidos

que de novo emergem à tona dos meus dias.

Comercial Antigo - (1993) Tv Philco

Charge do dia


Aroeira - Jornal O Dia - Rio de Janeiro, RJ

Live: MPs grill failed bank bosses - The Times, uk - link (aqui)




February 10, 2009

The former chief executives and chairmen of RBS and HBOS are being called to account by the Commons Treasury Select Committee. Follow it live here...

Mickey Rourke: Hey Mickey, you're so fine - The Independent, uk - link (aqui)

Mickey Rourke celebrates after being named at the Bafta awards as best actor for his role in The Wrestler

He was down and out of the Hollywood A-list, but with a Bafta in one hand and a bottle of bubbly in the other Mickey Rourke is the undisputed king of the comeback.

By Arifa Akbar

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

It is a fight that many Hollywood has-beens have picked but few have won; to launch a comeback from the wilderness long after their celluloid star has faded. This week, Mickey Rourke clambered onto the stage at the Baftas and acknowledged the joy, and the pain, of coming back in from the cold as he collected his best actor award for his role in The Wrestler.

"Oh, it's such a pleasure to be back out of the darkness," he said.

It was a sweet moment for the former boxer, turned Hollywood superstar, turned failing, ageing boxer, turned triumphant Hollywood elder statesman. And Rourke could have chosen no better vehicle through which to rise from the ashes than the lead character in The Wrestler: Randy "The Ram" Robinson, a great wrestler in the 1980s whose prowess in the wrestling ring has long since declined.

The film opens with a montage of posters and newspaper clippings from his glory days when he was the personificastion of machismo, undefeated and apparently undefeatable in the ring. It then cuts to the present day when we discover fortune has not been kind to The Ram. His star has faded, his body is bloated and his face disfigured from years of heavy medication and a growing inability to dodge the slings, arrows and punches of life. Yet he is soldiering on.

It could be a film about Rourke's own career trajectory.

Like Randy, Rourke's life began in the ring. He was born in New York but when his father left the family home, his mother moved to Miami and the six-year-old Rourke was forced to fend for himself on the streets of a tough inner city. To defend himself he took up boxing and enrolled in the Boys Club of Miami where before him Muhammad Ali had sparred.

He won his first fight at the age of 12, by the age of 17, been concussed a number of times – once with the former world welterweight champion, Luis Rodriguez, and doctors advised him to rest. Casting around for a new career, he found it when a friend at the University of Miami mentioned he was looking for an actor to fill the role of "Green Eyes" in the Jean Genet play, Deathwatch, which he was directing. With nothing better to do, Rourke tried it out – and fell in love with the profession. Borrowing $400 from his sister, he took off to New York and landed private acting lessons with one of the city's finest teachers, Sandra Seacat.

It was not until he was 27 that he secured his first film role in Steven Spielberg's film 1941 but the real breakthrough for Rourke came two years later when he played an arsonist in Body Heat, with Kathleen Turner and William Hurt. He followed up the success with highly acclaimed performances in the cult classic, Diner, Francis Ford Coppola's film, Rumble Fish, and the modern noir, Angel Heart, which became some of the biggest films of the 1980s.

He was at the peak of his powers when he starred in the erotic 9 1/2 Weeks alongside Kim Basinger; the world compared his on-screen charisma to the savage sexiness of Marlon Brando, he courted the most beautiful women, he dominated the film industry. But despite the veneer of sucess, under the surface things were going wrong. Decades later, he admitted he began to feel "short-circuited". "I had a lot of turmoil going on within myself, within relationships that I had. And I sort of lost a passion for it that I had when I studied really hard at the actor's studio back when I was a student when Lee Strasberg was there, and I walked in.

"Back then it was very hard to get into the studio. And, you know, I walked in, and I saw Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, Chris Walken, Harvey Keitel, Ellen Burstyn there, and it was just –I went, wow, and I really wanted to be the best actor I could and then some years went by and I just –I short-circuited."

If he was feeling the strain – so were the directors he worked with. Alan Parker said that working with Rourke was a "nightmare".

"He is very dangerous on the set because you never know what he is going to do", he added.

It is a moot point whether he stopped paying attention to Hollywood, or whether Hollywood stopped paying attention to him but Rourke suddenly declared he was turning away from acting, that he had "no respect for myself being as an actor any more", and returning to his first love of boxing.

Now aged 34, he was no longer as young or as robust as he had been. Reflecting on the decision to return to the ring for a second time, he has said: "It was a profession I had before I was an actor and I should have left it there. Going back at 34 was hard."

It proved too hard a career to resume. Defeated in eight fights, he was told that if he entered the ring for a ninth time, he might not be able to count the money he could make from it. The comeback to boxing hadn't worked, so in 1995, he went back to Hollywood. It was a black period. "I could remember something from 200 years ago but not five minutes ago ... I knew I'd have to go back to acting. Boy, when I had to go into acting again ... easy the first time, fucking nightmare the second," he said.

His return wasn't helped by some ill-judged decisions to turn down roles that would have been perfect launching pads back into the industry. He didn't take a call from Dustin Hoffman when he contacted Rourke about a role in the film Rain Man, he chose not to play Jack Crawford in The Silence of the Lambs and when Quentin Tarantino sent him a script for Pulp Fiction, he didn't bother to read it.

Rash decisions were followed by back luck: his part in Terence Malik's acclaimed drama, The Thin Red Line, ended up on the cutting-room floor.

In the late 1990s, he starred in a sequel to Nine 1/2 Weeks, the film that had cemented his reputation as a sex symbol in the 1980s. Except the second film, Another Nine 1/2 Weeks, was a critical flop and only received limited distribution. A straight-to-video film about the race horse, Shergar, followed.

His fate as a declining profile in Hollywood, appeared to be sealed and the best he could get was bit parts in feature films and music videos.

His salvation – as so often in Hollywood – came via a twist of fortune. Nicholas Cage, was originally cast to play the lead character in The Wrestler until Rourke expressed an interest in the role. The film's director Darren Aronofsky was so desperate to cast Rourke that he dropped Cage from the film.

And Rourke is grateful for every moment of the restored glory – and all those involved in engineering it. In his wonderfully frank Bafta acceptance speech, he thanked Aronofsky, who "gave me a second chance after I fucked up my career for 15 years" as well as "my publicist Paula (Woods) for having the hardest job in showbusiness, telling me where to go, what to do, when to do it. What to eat, what to dress, what to fuck ..."

Yesterday, Ms Woods appeared to be working industriously to underplay the difficulties she may have had in relaunching his ravaged profile. The worst in showbusiness? "I would say it's the most rewarding job in showbusiness," she said, adding: "To see such results from my and especially Mickey's hard work is fantastic. When Mickey made The Wrestler and felt instinctively it was going to be a special journey for him, he asked me to come on board to handle his worldwide publicity.

"Mickey has embraced his comeback with genuine passion. Our working relationship is based on trust. I am very honest with Mickey and ensure he is well briefed and therefore fully prepared and happy with everything he does to promote the movie."

Sounds like Rourke? Even the reformed version? Not entirely.

The Wrestler

*It was made with the use of a hand-held camera at a cost of $5.5m.

*The film is based on the fictional character Randy "The Ram" Robinson who, like Rourke, is a fighter who was advised to leave the profession after serious health concerns.

*Rourke has won a Golden Globe and a Bafta for the role. He is also nominated for the best actor Oscar.

*Darren Aronofsky said "every financier on the planet said 'no' to this movie, and the reason was Mickey".

Munch crunch: Britain's restaurant crisis - The Independent, uk - link (aqui)

GORDON RAMSAY: The chef's global restaurant chain has a reported overdraft of £10.5m. It has closed two outlets in London, but says business is good.


Last month alone, more than 100 British restaurants went out of business. But it's not just the Michelin brigade who are in hot water. Martin Hickman and Tim Walker report on a simmering kitchen nightmare

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

By the time you find out, it's often too late. You may have visited your favourite local restaurant one Saturday night and commented on how quiet it was, or even thought yourself lucky when you managed to get a table without a booking. But, more likely, the first sign that things are going wrong is a notice plastered to the door. And the notices are starting to look familiar.

Take Pick More Daisies, in Crouch End, north London. You may have a similar joint near you – good burgers, American diner brunches, people flicking through the papers on Sunday mornings, or grabbing a bite to eat with a beer or two in the evenings for less than £20. Nothing too expensive, good food, just the sort of place that would tick over very nicely, even when most people aren't feeling inclined to blow their monthly salary on a meal at a Michelin-starred restaurant.

But one day last month, instead of the usual steady bustle, the notice appeared, Blu-Tacked to the inside of the glass door: "Unfortunately, as with many things in life, there is a fine line between success and failure, and for us that line has been the credit crunch. Whilst we were actively looking for new sites earlier this year, trade has dramatically dropped since the summer and with the economic outlook bleak we have been forced to close our doors for good. It has been a real pleasure serving you and we're so sad that we are unable to continue on our path."


Similar stories are playing out across Britain. In Love's Fish Restaurant in Brighton, customers received a similar message. The restaurant, run by Alan Love, closed at the beginning of January, despite the revitalising efforts of Gordon Ramsay featuring the place on Kitchen Nightmares. "Alan and his staff would like to thank everyone who came to the restaurant in the past two years for their support and best wishes. We were very lucky to have had such a wonderful mixture of people to serve. It's a very sad time for us all..."

For diners, the memories of enjoying food and conversations, of meeting people, of birthdays celebrated and anniversaries toasted may flash through the mind, perhaps followed by a flash of irritation that another venue will need to be found at short notice. But for restaurateurs, the rising tide of closures of restaurants in the recession is an accumulation of individual disasters – that may leave an aftertaste of bad debt, ill-health and depression.

"It's very close to your heart and it's desperate to see that it isn't going to survive," says Tom Sillar, a 43-year-old wine merchant who ran the Comfort Food bistro in Newcastle until its closure in October. "But it wouldn't have been fair to have carried on. We left a number of suppliers with debts. They were all small – say £500 for lots of suppliers – but they were small businesses as well."

After his modern British restaurant closed, Sillar split with his wife and business partner Emily, and blames the stress of trying to save the place for giving him pneumonia; from which he is still recovering.

To patrons who had frequented the restaurant during its four-year life, the inevitable note read: "With effect from October 4, the Comfort Food Co will be closed. Blame the banks. I would like to thank all the customers for their business over the last four years or so, and wish you all the best for the future."

The collapse of Northern Rock in 2007 was the moment millions of Britons realised their life had changed, but at the Comfort Food Co the impact was sudden and dramatic. The bank's managers had taken clients to the restaurant, keen on its local sourcing and bistro dishes such as lamb shanks and locally smoked haddock. When the bank collapsed, heralding the onset of tighter lending, job losses and reduced consumer spending, many of those execs stopped coming. Others went less frequently. "When they did come, the emphasis was on value for money – spending less money, two courses instead of three."

Looking back on the closure of the £40-a-head restaurant, Sillar says he did not have enough capital to see it through dips in turnover. Falling spending power has sent the once-booming restaurant sector into a once-in-a-decade retreat. From the Michelin-starred establishments to the casual dining chains busily promoting two-for-one offers with discount coupons on the internet, almost every restaurant is feeling the squeeze.

Even the big names have had their egos bruised by the worsening trade. Last week, celebrity chef Antony Worrall Thompson was forced to close six of his restaurants and put his company, AWT Restaurants, into administration, with the loss of 60 jobs. Worrall Thompson used £250,000 from his own pocket to preserve two of the restaurants – the Windsor Grill and the Kew Grill – and a shop in Windsor from the adminstrators; but the Notting Grill, AWT's flagship, has closed, taking 23 employees with it. The chef blames the banks for their failure to support his business in its hour of need. Lloyds, he claims, refused to loan him the £200,000 life raft required to keep all six establishments afloat. "I have learnt from these banks that if you owe a couple of hundred thousand like we did, they have got you by the balls," he told the Mail on Sunday. "You owe them £10m and you have them by the balls."

Worrall Thompson's multi-Michelin-starred rival, Gordon Ramsay, may beg to differ. His own global chain of 25 restaurants is trapped in a particularly vivid kitchen nightmare, with a reported business overdraft, from the Royal Bank of Scotland, of £10.5m. Gordon Ramsay Holdings was fined for failing to file accounts on time, and in the past year has closed two of its London restaurants, La Noisette in Knightsbridge, and the Petrus at the Berkeley Hotel.

The company is adamant that "business is good", with increased turnover and profit. But Ramsay has closed his Chelsea bistro, Foxtrot Oscar, on Mondays and Tuesdays and in the evenings on Wednesdays and Thursdays, and two more Ramsay enterprises, the Devonshire pub in Chiswick and the private dining rooms that replaced La Noisette, both appeared – mistakenly, it was later explained – in the "for sale" section of a business website. Ramsay and Worrall Thompson's fellow TV chef Jean-Christophe Novelli has been forced to close two gastropubs after his business, Sweet Medicine, went bust.

Meanwhile, the combustible kitchen talent Tom Aikens angered his creditors by popping his flagship eponymous restaurant in Chelsea into pre-pack administration in September, reopening it almost straight away, minus £3m in debts. This left his 160 suppliers, many of them small family firms, with a £1m shortfall, and earned him reams of criticism.

In January, the chef offered a mea culpa in an interview with the London Evening Standard, confessing that he felt "a complete shitbag" for "[taking his] eye off the ball".

Raymond Blanc has had to close one of his restaurants, Brasserie Blanc in Manchester. "Of course I am upset about the closure – I do not like to lose," remarked the Gallic chef, one of the ever-present stars of British cooking.

Alain Ducasse, whose Dorchester Hotel restaurant charges £120 a head, says he has put his global expansion plans on hold because of the downturn. Other top restaurants are having to work harder to gain custom, particularly at lunchtime, where the fall-off in expense account trade has been stark. L'Atelier de Joel Robuchon and Arbutus in London offer lunches for less than £20 per head, while the acclaimed Glasshouse in Kew offers lunch for £11.75.

One London restaurateur, Peter Ilic, this month tore up his prices and asked customers to pay what they liked for his food. "It just seemed the right thing to do with everyone under the cosh and feeling pretty miserable," remarked the proprietor of the Little Bay restaurant in Farringdon, London, who will still charge a set fee for drinks. "We have seen so many more City folk coming into the restaurant lately looking for a better value lunch."

On the high street, Prezzo, Strada and Ask, Gourmet Burger Kitchen, Café Rouge, Caffe Uno and Ha Ha are among the chains that have two-for-one offers.

Across the industry, more and more restaurants are going bust. According to accountants PricewaterhouseCoopers, the number of restaurant companies slipping into insolvency rose from 72 to 92 to 111 in the first three quarters of last year, before easing to 107 in the final three months, when Christmas parties provided a spike in business. Last month, 108 restaurants went under, according to PwC.

Turnover has switched from growth to stagnation. Horizons is a company that monitors restaurant business based on returns from public companies, government data and its own market research.

Managing director Peter Backman says that spending only fell three times in the previous three decades – at the height of the two previous recent recessions, in 1983 and 1992, and in 2001 when the dotcom bubble bust, and Sars and terrorism combined to buck the growth trend.

What will happen this time? "It all depends on what customers and operators do. Demand is undoubtedly weakening," says Backman. "But how much it will weaken we don't know. We are seeing lots of two-for-one offers – what will this do to customers and profits?"

Restaurants have had to battle rising costs, he says. Last year, the two factors that account for two-thirds of restaurant expenses spiked up – the cost of ingredients rose by 8 per cent and labour by 4 per cent.

Margins in the restaurants trade are low – as low as 5 per cent. Industry watchers are surprised that more eateries have not shut, which leads some to believe that the country may be braced for a spate of closures.

"Everyone agrees wine spending is down and that splashing lots of money on a posh bottle has gone... If you are in the restaurant business, there are many reasons to be miserable," says Richard Harden, veteran co-editor of the Harden's restaurant guides.

"But there appears to be a mismatch between the fact that there should be lots of restaurant closures and there aren't. I walked through Soho recently and I couldn't see any sites that were vacant. Everyone is under pressure but it's not yet pushing anyone to breaking point."

What seems to be happening is that in the recession, consumers are shying away from "big ticket" purchases – houses and cars – but are still going out for meals, and still go on holiday. They are, however, going to cheaper places and spending less. Choosing seabass instead of the lobster, spare ribs rather than the T-bone, crème brûlée not the lemon tart, a 2007 beaujolais, not the 1998 claret – the kind of reduced spend that did for Newcastle's Comfort Food and for many of the other 500 closures since the start of 2008.

Enterprising owners will still be seduced by the prospect of opening a restaurant. After years of boom, a growing interest in food, a near constant diet of TV shows – Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares and Blanc's The Restaurant – there has been no shortage of aspiring restaurateurs, though the overall number of restaurants is almost certain to go down, for now.

"Restaurants are closing all the time, irrespective of recession of not," says Miles Quest, spokesman for the British Hospitality Association.

"It's the most difficult sector of the hospitality industry to raise money for because banks are suspicious of restaurants as so many go bust in the normal course of events. Another thing is that a restaurant may close one day and reopen the next with a different style of food, so one day it might be an Italian, close and then reopen serving Chinese food. There is no doubt that people are eating out less or spending less, but we have no figures to prove that – it's anecdotal evidence."

Alasdair Murdoch, chief executive of Pizza Hut, the largest UK dining chain with 700 outlets, believes more restaurants will close. "It's unlikely there will be big-chain casualties, but the small, niche chains will struggle. Either they're up to their ears in debt or they don't offer value for money.

Individual restaurateurs should concentrate on their distinctive local quality, he suggests. "I would play to my cosiness, warmth and hospitality – but I would still try to employ some techniques to drive customers in. You can't compete in price; you shouldn't try. Compete on your strengths, but look at ideas like offering free wine for a next visit."

March is the cruellest month for restaurateurs, when cashflow is at its lowest, says Stephen Broome, director of hospitality and leisure at PricewaterhouseCoopers. "What we have seen are the earliest casualties – businesses that have some flaw – prices or positioning," he says. "I won't be surprised if there are more casualties, but neither am I expecting a flood." At Horizons, Backman says, "We are probably going to see the banks pulling the plug on a lot of companies. Banks let them go through Christmas and New Year to pick up some cash and then they pull the plug."

Has your favourite restaurant closed? Or are you a restaurateur with advice or an experience to share? Then have your say at www.independent.co.uk/restaurantcrisis

The heat in the kitchen: How are the big names doing?

TOM SILLAR: Ran the Comfort Food bistro in Newcastle until its closure in October. "It's desperate to see that it's not going to survive"

GORDON RAMSAY: The chef's global restaurant chain has a reported overdraft of £10.5m. It has closed two outlets in London, but says business is good.

RAYMOND BLANC: The Gallic chef has had to close one of his restaurants, Brasserie Blanc in Manchester. "Of course I am upset about the closure – I do not like to lose."

TOM AIKENS: The chef angered creditors by popping his Chelsea restaurant into administration, reopening it almost straight away, minus debts.

ALAIN DUCASSE: Runs international restaurant group, but says he has put his global expansion plans on hold because of the downturn.

ANTONY WORRALL THOMPSON: The chef has closed six of his restaurants and put his company, AWT Restaurants, into administration.

How small restaurants can survive and thrive: By Mark Hix

Everyone in the industry is feeling the pinch at the moment, so it's at times like this you have to keep your head down and really keep your customers happy. If they're going to survive, restaurants have got to raise their game, look more closely at what they're doing, and give better value. The most damaging expense for restaurateurs isn't wages, rent or even food – it's losing customers.

Value is key, and that doesn't just mean a cheaper menu, it means being more careful about what you're spending, yet still giving your customers quality food. When I opened my Oyster & Chop House last April, we put lots of lesser-known cuts of meat on the menu. Things like flank cuts, cheeks and shins, which might usually end up in the butcher's mincer but, with skilful cooking, are delicious. Better still, they're cheaper than an expensive fillet that doesn't taste of anything. It's the same with cheaper fish. I'm a big fan of gurnard, herring and mackerel.

You've also got to give your customers choice. A lot of restaurateurs think they have to have every starter under £10 and every main under £20, but it's more sensible to have a range. We might have a mackerel main course on the menu for £10 and then something like a sea bass for £25. If you don't give people the option to spend more, they're not going to.

Wine is always important, and different restaurants mark it up in different ways. You either go big to get maximum profit on each bottle, or you do what we do and give your customers a bit more value on higher end wines to encourage them to buy a second bottle. I've also started putting a few magnums on the menu. They're twice the size of standard bottles and are reasonably priced, from around £40 upwards, but it's also something a bit special for tables to share.

Meat isn't getting any cheaper, nor is fish, but restaurants can't afford to fall out with their suppliers. Too many people take advantage by not paying on time, but the industry needs to tighten up on this. You wouldn't walk into a restaurant as a customer and say, "Do you mind if I pay for my dinner in two months?".

Your suppliers are as important as your staff, and you've got to be able to trust each other, especially when times are tough.

Another big mistake is spending too much on design. The Chop House had a very low budget for refit. We kept a lot of the fixtures and fittings that were in the restaurant that used to be in the building, and kept things simple. You can blow a million pounds on a new restaurant and watch it flop. It comes down to having a good business sense. A lot of restaurants start up without any internal financial knowledge, and can go for months on end without knowing where they are. You can't get away with that – you need to know exactly how much you've made, or lost, from week to week.

Surviving is about the whole package – there isn't any one thing you can do to stay strong, but if you've got good food and a good atmosphere, you're halfway there.

Mark Hix is resident chef for the 'Independent' Magazine. He has two restaurants, Hix Oyster & Chop House in Smithfield, London; and Hix Oyster & Fish House in Lyme Regis, Dorset, and was formerly chef director of the Caprice Group

Balancing the books: The business expert's advice

1. Remember: cash is king. Focus on cash generation, not solely on profit margins. It's better to sell four bottles of wine at £5 per bottle cash profit than one bottle at £7.50 profit, hence the phrase, 'you can't bank percentages'.

2. Re-engineer menus and wine lists to maintain margins. Substitute lower cost alternative products and carefully tinker with ingredients and portion sizes. (But be careful: the public are very astute.)

3. Offer targeted discounts during quiet periods, rather than continuous offers all the time. Review competition and change promotions regularly to prevent boredom.

4. Remove backroom costs. Reduce larger costs first: payroll, energy, laundry. Demand suppliers offer discounts or other support or switch to cheaper suppliers. Identify trading peaks and troughs and adapt staffing, rather than follow historic patterns. Start with a blank sheet of paper and imagine how you would manage costs if you were opening today.

5. Recognise the value of your chefs and waiters – keep the best – and be prepared to lose those who make little contribution.

Stephen Broome is a director of PricewaterhouseCoopers and has 40 years' experience working in hospitality and leisure

'This is the worst recession for over 100 years' - The Independent, uk -- link (aqui)

Ed Balls, the PM's closest ally, warns that downturn is ferocious and says impact will last 15 years

By Nigel Morris, Deputy Political Editor, and Sean O'Grady, Economics Editor

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

Britain is facing its worst financial crisis for more than a century, surpassing even the Great Depression of the 1930s, one of Gordon Brown's most senior ministers and confidants has admitted.

In an extraordinary admission about the severity of the economic downturn, Ed Balls even predicted that its effects would still be felt 15 years from now. The Schools Secretary's comments carry added weight because he is a former chief economic adviser to the Treasury and regarded as one of the Prime Ministers's closest allies.

Mr Balls said yesterday: "The reality is that this is becoming the most serious global recession for, I'm sure, over 100 years, as it will turn out."

He warned that events worldwide were moving at a "speed, pace and ferocity which none of us have seen before" and banks were losing cash on a "scale that nobody believed possible".

The minister stunned his audience at a Labour conference in Yorkshire by forecasting that times could be tougher than in the depression of the 1930s, when male unemployment in some cities reached 70 per cent. He also appeared to hint that the recession could play into the hands of the far right.

"The economy is going to define our politics in this region and in Britain in the next year, the next five years, the next 10 and even the next 15 years," Mr Balls said. "These are seismic events that are going to change the political landscape. I think this is a financial crisis more extreme and more serious than that of the 1930s, and we all remember how the politics of that era were shaped by the economy."

Philip Hammond, the shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury, said Mr Balls's predictions were "a staggering and very worrying admission from a cabinet minister and Gordon Brown's closest ally in the Treasury over the past 10 years". He added: "We are being told that not only are we facing the worst recession in 100 years, but that it will last for over a decade – far longer than Treasury forecasts predict."

The minister's comments came as the Chancellor, Alistair Darling, admitted the global economy was "seeing the most difficult economic conditions for generations". Writing in today's Independent, Mr Darling said his plans for shoring up Britain's finances included "measures to insure against extreme losses" as well as separating out impaired assets into a "parallel financial vehicle". Unemployment figures out tomorrow are expected to show the number of people out of work has passed two million. The Bank of England's quarterly inflation report, also released tomorrow, is expected to include a gloomy forecast for economic growth.

Yesterday, the Financial Services Authority warned that the recession "may be deeper and more prolonged than expected", adding that the global financial system had "suffered its greatest crisis in more than 70 years".

Speaking to Labour activists in Sheffield, Mr Balls conceded that the Government must share some of the blame because it had failed properly to control the banks. But he accused the Tories of blocking Labour's attempts to tighten financial rules.

He said: "People are quite right to say that financial regulation wasn't tough enough in Britain and around the world, that regulators misunderstood and did not see the nature of the risks of the dangers being run in our financial institutions – absolutely right."

The other great depressions

*Long Depression, 1873–96

Precipitated by the "panic of 1873" crisis on Wall Street and a severe outbreak of equine flu (Karl Benz's first automobile did not chug on to the scene until 1886), it was remarkable for its longevity as well as its global reach. In Britain, it was the rural south rather than the rich cities of the north that suffered. The UK ceased to be a nation that relied in any way on farming for its livelihood.

*Great Depression, 1930s

The "Hungry Thirties" were rough on many, at a time when welfare systems were rudimentary. The worst period was from the Wall Street Crash of 1929 to about 1932, but in places such as Jarrow, the unemployment rate hardly dipped below 50 per cent until the economy was mobilised in 1940. However, for many in the south and for the middle classes, the times were relatively prosperous.

The 12 questions that bank bosses must answer today - The Guardian, uk - link (aqui)



As four top bankers are grilled by MPs, the Guardian's head of business, Dan Roberts, lays out the key issues they must address

The next 36 hours could prove a watershed in the history of the financial crisis. Over three political hearings on both sides of the Atlantic, the heads of 16 of the world's largest banks will be called to account. Some, such as Sir Fred Goodwin of the Royal Bank of Scotland, will be speaking in public on the subject for the first time.

The US House of Representatives has summoned Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup tomorrow to discuss how they are using federal bail-out money. Britain's Treasury select committee has a broader remit: quizzing the government-owned RBS and HBOS about the wider banking crisis today, then Lloyds, Barclays and HSBC tomorrow.

Until now, parliament's financial watchdog has been accused of giving our banks a softer ride than the notoriously robust congressional hearings.

Since the committee of backbench MPs first started tackling the private equity industry two years ago, critics have questioned its ability to home in on the key financial issues.

Today, there are at least a dozen questions that need to be answered:

Why did your risk models not show up the dangers?

Banks pride themselves on being able to measure risk. But the mystery is that their models all failed to anticipate what would happen if banks no longer had access to wholesale funding sources such as the securitisation market, even though these were a relatively recent invention.

How often did you think about your bonus when making decisions?

This goes to the heart of the current row over pay. Bonuses exist to provide healthy incentives, but appear instead to have encouraged a short-term rush for growth. MPs might also ask if there are any circumstances in which the bankers would support clawing back bonuses paid for poor performance or deals that have subsequently backfired.

After the collapse of Northern Rock, is there more you could have done to reduce risk?

More than a year elapsed between the collapse of Northern Rock, which showed the fragility of the British banking model, and the collapse of Lehman Brothers, which brought down the whole system. Yet banks such as HBOS continued to increase their exposure to the very riskiest markets, such as property. Why?

How big a part did tax avoidance play in encouraging an excessive reliance on debt in corporate capital structures?

Much of the riskiest business was hidden from the view of regulators and shareholders in "off balance sheet" vehicles. These are often highly tax efficient. Huge loans were also made to private equity firms because debt financing attracted less tax than equity financing.

Why should profits be private, but losses socialised?

Public anger has been fuelled by the sight of bankers reaping huge rewards when times were good but needing public assistance when times are bad. Can the bankers make a convincing case against nationalisation?

If the industry's full liabilities and assets were valued on a mark-to-market basis, would it be solvent?

Banks have criticised regulators for exacerbating the crisis by focusing on the present, distressed, prices of their assets rather than their long-term value, but how bad would it look if the music stopped tomorrow? Does the investment banking model have a long-term future?

Has short-selling played a significant role in destabilising banks?

Some of biggest beneficiaries of short-selling were investment banks, but they changed their tune when speculators turned on them. What do they think now that bans on short-selling have been lifted?

Did you understand all parts of your business?

Banks became enormous and enormously complicated during the boom. The suspicion is that the risk of instruments such as credit derivatives was poorly understood even by their traders.

Did you feel your fellow board directors, shareholders, and regulators were fully aware of the risks you were taking?

If bank executives were struggling, what about those supposed to be keeping an eye on them?

At what point did you realise the system was in trouble, and at what point did you admit it to anyone else?

The roots of the credit crisis predate even Northern Rock by nearly a year, beginning with the sub-prime crisis in the US. Few senior figures have spoken publicly about the scale of the crisis until the last few weeks.

How can we stop this happening again?

Who better to answer gamekeeping questions than the poachers?

Will you say sorry?

Given the spiralling cost of the recession on us all, a lack of contrition from many senior bankers has enraged public opinion. How many apologies will we get?

Brown seeks Obama-style bonus cap - The Guardian, uk - link (aqui)

A man walks across the Royal Bank of Scotland bridge at their head office in Edinburgh. Photograph: David Cheskin/PA

RBS staff face £25k limit as Balls says world in worst recession for 100 years



Bankers would face a £25,000 cap on cash bonuses under plans being examined by the Treasury last night in a bid to silence the public outcry over the City's culture of huge rewards and dangerous risk-taking.

But the move to stifle growing anger over bonuses at the Royal Bank of Scotland was in danger of being overshadowed as Gordon Brown's righthand man in the cabinet, Ed Balls, said the world was facing the most serious recession for 100 years.

His remarks, the most alarming to be made by a senior government minister, interpret the crisis as worse than the great depression of the 1930s.

The Treasury wants RBS - now 68% owned by the government - to rein in large bonuses in a year when it is scheduled to post losses running to billions of pounds. Ministers are trying to negotiate a £25,000 cap on cash bonuses, with the remainder being taken in share options.

The government's effort to show that it is responding to public anger over the bonus culture was undermined yesterday however when it emerged that the man appointed by the government to conduct a review of City pay was himself given multi-million pound bonuses while serving as European chairman of US bank Morgan Stanley.

According to a New York Times report Sir David Walker earned over $10m from Morgan Stanley in 1995 and 1996. Sir David worked for the US bank from 1994-2000. No other figures for his remuneration during this period were available and he was not available for comment yesterday.

The government plan to cap bonuses emerged as the former RBS chief Sir Fred Goodwin and three other senior bankers prepared to face the Treasury select committee for a live television inquisition about the scale of their culpability for the financial meltdown.

Gordon Brown responded yesterday to popular and backbench concerns that the public was beginning to "disengage" with the government's technocratic approach to constraining bonuses by insisting yesterday he would sweep away the system.

But the government was shaken by the admission from Balls, the children's secretary and former chief economic adviser to the Treasury, who said: "I think this is a financial crisis more extreme and more serious than that of the 30s, and we all remember how the politics of that era were shaped by the economy."

Speaking at a meeting of the Yorkshire Labour party at the weekend, he added: "We are now seeing the realities of globalisation, though at a speed, pace and ferocity which none of us have seen before. The reality is this is becoming the most serious global recession, I am sure, for over 100 years." He predicted "the seismic events may define politics for the next 15 years".

Number 10 last week denied that the prime minister believed the world was on the edge of a depression when he inadvertently used the phrase at prime minister's questions.

Balls's office insisted others had made similarly pessimistic forecasts, citing a speech by Charlie Bean, deputy governor of the Bank of England, who warned in October: "This is a once in a lifetime crisis, and possibly the largest financial crisis of its kind in human history.' "

On the issue of bonuses, the government said the Treasury was still negotiating with banks in which it had shareholdings to clamp down on payouts below the level of the boardroom.

Sources involved in the talks suggested RBS would cut bonuses by two-thirds on last year's figures and impose the £25,000 cap with the rest available in shares, but government members recognise there may be difficulties in enforcing caps.

Ministers are hoping RBS can be pressed into outlining concessions when Stephen Hester, RBS chief executive, speaks to the Treasury select committee tomorrow.

Number 10 also stressed that it was seeking to influence the scale of bonuses in banks it does not control by requiring any institution that applies for insurance to cover its bad assets to reach a contractual agreement with the treasury on bonuses in return for the insurance.

As the political temperature rose, David Cameron accused the government of being asleep on the job, while the Liberal Democrats called for a complete freeze on bonuses.

Ministers also denied suggestions that the review announced at the weekend in banking governance due to report by the end of the year puts wider action on bonuses on hold for as long as a year. It was being stressed that plans for a Treasury white paper on banking corporate governance due to be published at the time of the budget in April will go ahead. The Financial Services Authority will also strengthen the rules on what constitutes a good and proper person to run a bank.

Speaking in London, Brown tried to fend off opposition charge of dithering. He insisted: "We are leading the world in sweeping away the old short term bonus culture of the past and replacing it with a determination that there are no rewards for failure and rewards only for long-term success."

The tougher rhetoric from the government came amidst signs of frustration in the cabinet, and some backbench MPs ,that the government is failing to provide the kind of clear leadership on bonuses that has been offered by Barack Obama in the US and by Nicolas Sarkozy in France.

Récession... - Libération, fr - link (aqui)

31 janvier à Tokyo, un homme passe devant un sans-abris. (REUTERS)

Récession (en France), licenciements (au Japon), «paralysie» (aux USA)... rien ne va plus

Quand les mauvais chiffres s'accumulent... Mais pour les Bourses, ça va encore.

10/02/2009 à 08h14

Suppressions de 20.000 postes chez Nissan, recul de l’excédent commercial de l’Allemagne, croissance française attendue en baisse: les mauvaises nouvelles ont confirmé lundi une aggravation de la conjoncture économique, tandis que Barack Obama se bat pour un plan de relance.

Le forum des ministres des Finances de la zone euro, l’Eurogroupe, a appelé les entreprises à éviter le recours aux licenciements collectifs et à privilégier le chômage partiel, du fait de la situation «inquiétante» de l’emploi.

Les Européens préparent un sommet extraordinaire sur la crise d’ici la fin du mois à Bruxelles pour resserrer les rangs au moment où la tentation du chacun pour soi refait surface.

Un plan d’aide à l’automobile française est ainsi devenu emblématique de la controverse sur le retour du protectionnisme. Paris va consentir deux prêts de 3 milliards d’euros à Renault et PSA Peugeot Citroën en échange de la pérennité des sites d’assemblage, a annoncé le président Nicolas Sarkozy.

Aux Etats-Unis, les sénateurs devaient voter mardi sur le plan de relance économique discuté depuis plusieurs semaines au Congrès. Le Sénat devra ensuite trouver un compromis avec la Chambre des représentants, qui a adopté un plan de 819 milliards de dollars.

Le président américain Barack Obama a pressé le Congrès d’adopter «immédiatement» le plan de relance et a mis en garde contre le risque d’une «catastrophe» économique plus grande en cas de «paralysie» à Washington.

L’annonce du nouveau plan gouvernemental de sauvetage des banques américaines, qui doit venir modifier et compléter celui de 700 milliards de dollars (540 milliards d’euros) voté en octobre par le Congrès à la demande du gouvernement précédent, a été repoussée à mardi.

Ce plan prévoit de régler la question des actifs douteux des banques en faisant appel à des capitaux privés bénéficiant d’une garantie publique, selon des fuites dans la presse.

La crise frappe durement le Japon qui a publié une série de chiffres catastrophiques. Le constructeur automobile Nissan, partenaire du français Renault, poursuit les plans sociaux: 20.000 postes supplémentaires seront supprimés au cours de l’exercice 2009-2010. Le nombre de faillites d’entreprises au Japon a bondi de 30,2% en janvier. Quant à l’excédent courant de l’archipel, il s’est effondré de 92,1% en décembre.

En Europe, l’excédent commercial de l’Allemagne, qui traverse sa pire crise économique depuis 1945, a reculé de 8,7% en 2008, pour atteindre 178,2 milliards d’euros.

En France, la banque centrale a estimé que le produit intérieur brut devrait baisser de 0,6% au premier trimestre 2009, après un recul attendu au dernier trimestre, ce qui marquerait le début de la récession.

La plupart des économistes et le gouvernement estiment que le PIB du dernier trimestre a été très mauvais, anticipant une chute de l’ordre de 1%. En Italie, le gouvernement prévoit une contraction du PIB de 2% cette année et un déficit public atteignant 3,7% du PIB.

Malgré l’avalanche de mauvaises nouvelles, les Bourses européennes ont terminé en légère hausse, Paris progressant de 0,39%, Francfort de 0,48% et Londres de 0,37%. La Bourse de New York a fini en très petite baisse en attendant de nouvelles mesures pour les banques américaines et l’adoption du plan de relance de l’économie. Le Dow Jones a perdu 0,12%. Tokyo avait auparavant terminé en baisse de 1,33%.

(Source AFP)

Une descendante pour la 2 CV - Le Figaro, fr - link (aqui)

C-Cactus. (DR)

Jacques Chevalier

Si la gamme DS vise le Premium, Citroën ne renie en rien la descendance de la 2 CV. Mais au-delà de la tendance vintage qui a fait le succès de la Mini, celle aussi du low-cost illustrée par Dacia, Citroën cherche sa propre voie. Il semble même l'avoir trouvée avec C-Cactus, qui n'est pas qu'un hommage lointain à la 2 CV. Il part d'une feuille blanche pour trouver d'autres façons de rouler qui soient conformes aux nouvelles aspirations de l'époque, sans être une interprétation a minima des modèles actuels. «Les clients qui veulent réduire leur budget automobile apprécieront de rouler plus intelligemment plutôt qu'à prix serrés.

C-SportLounge. (DR)
C-SportLounge. (DR)







Rappelons également le C-SportLounge, présenté au Salon de Francfort en 2005, qui présentait une fort intéressante vision du véhicule de grand tourisme «en phase avec l'évolution du plaisir automobile.»

Obama : «la fête est finie» - Le Figaro, fr - link (aqui)

Barack Obama a eu des paroles d'ouverture appuyées vis-à-vis de l'Iran. Crédits photo : AFP

De notre correspondante à Washington Laure Mandeville
10/02/2009 | Mise à jour : 07:31

Défense appuyée de son plan de relance et ouverture vers l'Iran ont été les grands thèmes de la première conférence de presse présidentielle de l'ère Obama.

«Si nous n'agissons pas, la crise pourrait tourner à la catastrophe». Ce n'était pas la première fois que Barack Obama prononçait ces paroles alarmistes au cours des derniers jours. Mais en les répétant lundi soir lors de sa première conférence de presse présidentielle, devant un «parterre de plus de 150 journalistes américains et étrangers réunis sous les lustres de cristal de la salle Est, à la Maison Blanche, le président a voulu rappeler en toute solennité la gravité de la situation à laquelle son plan de relance entend répondre. «598 000 personnes ont perdu leur emploi le mois dernier, l'équivalent de tous les emplois d'un Etat comme le Maine. Alors si quelqu'un a encore des doutes sur la gravité exceptionnelle de cette crise de grande ampleur, qu'il aille demander à l'un des millions d'Américains dont les vies ont été chamboulées parce qu'ils ne savent plus qui va leur donner leur prochain salaire», a poursuivi le président, qui arrivait tout juste d'un voyage d'une journée dans une petite ville de l'Etat d'Indiana, où le taux de chômage a triplé, passant en un an de 4,7% à 15,3. «C'est la pire crise depuis la grande dépression, nous avons perdu 6 millions d'emplois», a-t-il insisté. «La fête est terminée».

Bien décidé à contre-attaquer, après l'obstruction systématique pratiquée par les Républicains ces derniers jours contre son plan de sauvetage de l'économie américaine, Barack Obama, qui est apparu lundi à la fois calme et très offensif, ne s'est pas privé de dénoncer les réflexes «idéologiques» de ses adversaires, dont certains rejettent le plan a priori, parce qu'ils ne veulent pas d'une intervention de l'Etat dans l'économie. «Bien sûr que l'Etat ne peut pas tout…et que c'est le secteur privé qui crée l'essentiel des emplois, mais à ce moment précis, le gouvernement est seul à pouvoir briser le cercle vicieux selon lequel les gens ne consomment plus car ils perdent leur emploi, ce qui provoque de nouveaux licenciements», a-t-il plaidé, affirmant que la plupart des économistes, quelque que soit leur affiliation, étaient d'accord sur ce point.

Barack Obama a défendu avec force la logique de son plan de relance, en affirmant que la création ou le sauvetage de 4 millions d'emplois - son «objectif numéro 1» - permettrait de remettre en route le moteur de l'économie et de ramener la confiance. Il a dit sa conviction qu'après une année très difficile, l'horizon s'éclaire à partir du début de l'année prochaine, si le plan est adopté.«J'aurais préféré ne pas avoir à dépenser tout cet argent. Mais je n'ai pas choisi. J'ai hérité de cette crise…de cette dette…Voilà pourquoi quand j'entends les gars (de l'opposition, NDLR) critiquer, j'ai un peu de mal car il s'agit de ceux qui ont doublé la dette de l'Etat en huit ans !», a rappelé le président sur un ton ironique, appelant le Congrès à finaliser les détails du plan au plus vite. Après la Chambre des représentants, il y a une dizaine de jours, le Sénat devrait approuver sa propre version du plan de sauvetage mardi. Restera aux deux chambres à s'accorder sur un plan de compromis qui pourrait dépasser les 800 milliards de dollars. Obama, qui a demandé à ce qu'un texte final soit soumis à sa signature d'ici au 16 février, a par ailleurs reconnu lundi soir que la relance du crédit bancaire - objet central du plan de sauvetage du système financier - que doit présenter mardi son secrétaire au Trésor Timothy Geithner, serait l'autre grand défi des prochains mois, car «c'est le sang de l'économie qui est en jeu». Parlant de «la relance de l'immobilier» comme de son troisième objectif majeur.

Alors que les Républicains ont malmené la nouvelle administration cette semaine, seulement trois Sénateurs se ralliant finalement au plan Obama, le président a nié lors de sa conférence avoir été naïf dans sa politique d'ouverture. «Je n'ai pas sous-estimé le problème…Mais il y a de mauvaises habitudes à Washington qu'il va falloir casser». «Quand j'ai invité trois Républicains à participer à mon gouvernement et ouvert de larges discussions, ce n'était pas seulement pour arracher des votes à court terme, mais pour construire une relation de confiance» à long terme, a-t-il expliqué, jugeant indispensable de s'élever au dessus des querelles politiciennes en ces temps de crise exceptionnelle. Sur ce point, Barack Obama semble en phase avec l'opinion, qui selon un sondage de CNN, rendu public lundi soir, juge à 74% qu'il a très bien mené son dialogue avec les Républicains. «Barack Obama a eu raison de repartir en campagne dans le pays et de tenir sa conférence de presse, il est la meilleure arme dont dispose le camp démocrate», a souligné un commentateur de la chaîne continue américaine.

Lundi soir, le président a également répondu à plusieurs questions de politique étrangère, prononçant notamment des paroles d'ouverture appuyées vis-à-vis de l'Iran. Parlant «de ce pays au peuple extraordinaire, à l'histoire extraordinaire, mais qui s'est révélé si peu coopératif pour la paix et la stabilité de la région», Barack Obama a exprimé son souhait d'employer «toutes les ressources de la diplomatie américaine» pour faire évoluer la relation avec Téhéran. «Mon attente est que dans les mois à venir, nous cherchions des ouvertures qui nous permettent de commencer à nous asseoir des deux côtés d'une table, face à face, des ouvertures diplomatiques qui nous permettent de faire avancer notre politique dans une nouvelle direction», a dit le président. Obama n'a pas manqué de rappeler la nécessité d'être très «clairs» sur la condamnation du soutien de l'Iran à des organisations terroristes ou la poursuite d'un programme nucléaire iranien susceptible de susciter une course à l'atome à travers la région. «Nous voulons agir différemment, a-t-il dit. Mais c'est au tour de l'Iran d'envoyer des signes qu'il veut agir lui aussi différemment. De reconnaître que s'il a des droits vis-à-vis de la communauté internationale, il a aussi des responsabilités».

Nicolas Sarkozy en visite surprise en Irak - El País, es - link (aqui)

Nicolas Sarkozy a été accueilli par son homologue irakien Jalal Talabani puis salué par une garde d'honneur (capture France24/DR).

Lefigaro.fr (avec AFP)
10/02/2009 | Mise à jour : 08:40

Il s'agit de la première visite d'un chef de l'Etat français dans ce pays. Pour des raisons de sécurité, ce voyage n'avait pas été annoncé.

C'est la toute première visite jamais effectuée par un président français en Irak. Nicolas Sarkozy est arrivé mardi matin à Bagdad pour une visite surprise, accompagné du ministre des Affaires étrangères Bernard Kouchner et du ministre de la Défense Hervé Morin. Il a quitté la France lundi soir à 23h00 direction la Jordanie. De là-bas, il est monté à bord d'un avion sécurisé pour se rendre à Bagdad. C'est la première visite d'un dirigeant occidental non membre de la coalition internationale depuis l'intervention de 2003 qui, sous la conduite des Etats-Unis, a renversé le président Saddam Hussein. «Pour des raisons de sécurité, cette visite n'a pas été annoncée», a précisé la présidence française.

Nicolas Sarkozy a été accueilli par son homologue irakien Jalal Talabani puis salué par une garde d'honneur, au son de la Marseillaise. Le président doit également rencontrer le Premier ministre Nouri al-Maliki.

Cette visite du président intervient juste après les élections provinciales du 31 janvier. Le chef de l'Etat se rendra ensuite à Oman, au Bahreïn et dans le Koweït. Elle vise à renforcer la position de la France dans cette région, où l'influence américaine est très forte. En 2008, Nicolas Sarkozy s'était déjà rendu dans le Golfe, en Arabie saoudite et au Qatar.

Usa, primo sì al pacchetto Obama "Perché la crisi non diventi catastrofe" - la Repubblica, it - link (aqui)

Barack Obama

Via libera procedurale del Senato al piano di stimolo del presidente
"E' insostenibile che l'economia si regga solo sui consumi"

Sull'Iran "aspetteremo aperture che ci consentano di sedere allo stesso tavolo"

WASHINGTON - Primo via libera procedurale del Senato degli Stati Uniti al pacchetto di stimoli anticrisi di Barack Obama. I voti a favore sono stati 61 su 98 a fronte di una maggioranza richiesta di 60 voti. Oggi il voto, ormai scontato, su tutto il pacchetto. La Camera dei Rappresentanti ha approvato una versione del piano che prevede interventi per 819 miliardi di dollari e che dovrà essere integrata con quella del Senato, scesa dagli iniziali 937 a 827 miliardi di dollari. Il presidente americano ha incontrato i giornalisti nella sua prima conferenza stampa alla Casa Bianca, dominata dai temi economici. Il presidente ha fatto un esame della crisi in atto, "che è reale e conclamata" e ha ammonito il Congresso a passare al più presto il piano di stimolo per l'economia "prima che la crisi diventi una catastrofe". Sul piano della politica estera, ha confermato le aperture diplomatiche all'Iran, la necessità di un miglior coordinamento in Afghanistan tra gli Usa e i paesi alleati; America e Russia, ha detto, "siano le prime a dare il buon esempio in tema di riduzione degli armamenti nucleari per combattere la proliferazione". A questo scopo, "bisogna far ripartire la conversazione" con Mosca.

Le banche. "La festa è finita - ha detto il presidente americano - dobbiamo fermare la spirale negativa, è "insostenibile che l'economia si regga solo sui consumi" che, comunque, non sono i responsabili della crisi in atto. Alla radice della situazione attuale, ha precisato, ci sono i "rischi esorbitanti" ai quali le banche si sono esposte, quelle stesse banche con le quali l'amministrazione intende lavorare gomito a gomito per sbloccare il credito.

Il pacchetto anticrisi. L'obiettivo di Obama è ottenere la fine del dibattito parlamentare entro il 16 febbraio, ma la conciliazione tra le due versioni del piano (che differiscono in termini di priorità di spesa e settori interessati da sgravi fiscali e incentivi), affidata a una commissione bipartisan, potrebbe richiedere diversi giorni. Obama ha detto che solo il governo può combattere la "spirale negativa" che si è creata, ha definito "non perfetto" il piano di stimolo, "ma non possiamo restare con le mani in mano" o "ripetere otto anni di politica fallimentare basata sulle riduzioni fiscali ai più ricchi". La misura del successo o del fallimento del piano sarà la capacità "di creare quattro milioni di posti di lavoro". Altri indicatori: il ripristino del credito e la stabilizzazione del mercato immobiliare.

L'Iran. Il presidente ha detto che "nei prossimi mesi" gli Stati Uniti "aspetteranno aperture" che possano consentire di "sedere allo stesso tavolo e avviare una diplomazia faccia a faccia" che permetta di dare "una nuova direzione alla politica Usa". Ma questa ricerca di una "diplomazia diretta" sarà condizionata dai messaggi che nel frattempo Teheran invierà alla comunità mondiale: "Dev'essere chiaro che troviamo inaccettabile finanziare organizzazioni terroriste e che un Iran nucleare sarebbe un fattore destabilizzante nella regione".

La caccia ai terroristi. Obama ha ribadito che gli Usa "non tortureranno, rispetteranno la Convenzione di Ginevra, non violeranno i loro valori". E ha aggiunto che non è accettabile che in Pakistan esistano "rifugi" per i terroristi.
(10 febbraio 2009)

Obama: «Lavoreremo con le banche» - Corriere Della Sera, it - link (aqui)

Barack Obama (Ap)

Prima conferenza alla Casa Bianca: il presidente parla di economia, ma anche di politica estera e tortura

WASHINGTON - La crisi economica e la strategia per affrontarla, ma anche l'Iran, la tortura e l'Afghanistan: questo gli argomenti principali affrontati da Barack Obama nella sua prima conferenza stampa alla Casa Bianca. Un'ora spesa davanti alle telecamere, per ribadire la necessità di approvare velocemente il piano di incentivi al vaglio del Congresso e che dovrebbe contribuire a evitare che «la crisi si trasformi in una catastrofe» per gli Stati Uniti. E a sorpresa il presidente americano sceglie il prime time, la prima serata televisiva e anche il momento di massimo ascolto, per il suo messaggio dalla White House, particolare che rappresenta un’ulteriore dimostrazione della volontà del presidente americano di parlare con la massima trasparenza possibile, direttamente agli americani, quasi senza il filtro dei media.

«LAVOREREMO CON LE BANCHE» - Nel corso della conferenza stampa, Obama ha fatto l'esame della crisi in atto «che è reale e conclamata», fornendo anche le sue ricette: dal piano di stimolo al salvataggio del sistema finanziario per il quale «non è ancora chiaro» se serviranno o meno ulteriori fondi. «La festa è finita, dobbiamo fermare la spirale negativa» ha detto il presidente americano. «È insostenibile» ha aggiunto che l'economia si regga solo sui consumi che, comunque, non sono i responsabili della crisi in atto. Alla radice della situazione attuale vi sono i «rischi esorbitanti» ai quali le banche si sono esposte. Le stesse banche con le quali l'amministrazione americana, questa la promessa di Obama, intende lavorare gomito a gomito per sbloccare il credito.

POLITICA ESTERA - Nel discorso di Obama, oltre alla crisi, anche la politica estera in primo piano. Sull'Iran il presidente usa ha detto che «nei prossimi mesi» gli Stati Uniti «aspetteranno aperture» che possano consentire di «avviare una diplomazia faccia a faccia» In Afghanistan, d'altro canto, Obama vede la necessità di un miglior coordinamento tra gli Usa ed i paesi alleati. Sulla questione nucleare infine il successore di George W. Bush ha sottolineato che Stati Uniti e Russia devono essere i primi a dare il buon esempio in tema di riduzione degli armamenti. «Bisogna far ripartire la conversazione» con Mosca, ha detto Obama.

TORTURA - Circa la tortura, il presidente ha assicurato che gli Stati Uniti nella caccia ai terroristi «non tortureranno, rispetteranno la Convenzione di Ginevra, non violeranno i loro valori». «È una posizione che non indebolirà ma piuttosto rafforzerà la efficacia delle nostre azioni - ha detto Obama -. Dobbiamo sempre ricordare che nessuno è al di sopra della legge».

CRISI, PRIMO VIA LIBERA DEL SENATO - Prende forma intanto il rilancio dell'economia americana: dal Senato infatti arriva il primo via libera al piano di stimolo, mentre quello per favorire il credito e stabilizzare i mercati finanziari «è praticamente pronto». Il piano sarà svelato nel pomeriggio (ore 17 italiane) dal segretario al Tesoro Timothy Geithner. Lunedì giornata in sordina a Wall Street, con gli indici poco variati.


10 febbraio 2009

Australia se prepara para lo peor - El País, es - link (aqui)

Los bomberos intentan apagar uno de los incendios que asolan el sur de Australia- EFE


La ola de incendios que devora el sureste del país deja ya cerca de 200 muertos, aunque las autoridades temen que haya muchos más entre las cenizas

AGENCIAS - Sidney - 10/02/2009

El fuego continúa arrasando los Estados australianos de Victoria y Australia del Sur. Las llamas se han cobrado ya la vida de cerca de 200 personas, aunque las autoridades creen que lo peor puede estar por llegar, cuando los bomberos y servicios de emergencia puedan acceder a las zonas más devastadas por el fuego. Al menos un centenar de personas se cuentan como desaparecidas en la ola de incendios que comenzó el sábado, la más letal en la historia del país, que ha calcinado, además, 330.000 hectáreas y 750 viviendas.

Este lunes, el primer ministro australiano, Kevin Rudd, se ha hecho eco de una información policial que asegura que varios de los fuegos han sido provocados. Por ello, Rudd ha hablado de "asesinatos en masa" por parte de quienes hayan provocado los fuegos. De hecho, la policía ha acordonado zonas como si se tratara de escenas de crímenes.

"Hemos encontrado cadáveres dentro de coches, como si hubieran decidido huir cuando ya era tarde; hemos encontrado a gente en sus propiedades y en sus casas. También encontramos niños", es la descripción ofrecida por la policía estatal de Victoria. Muchos pacientes tienen quemaduras en más del 30% de sus cuerpos, según fuentes médicas.

El Gobierno australiano ordenó el sábado que el Ejército se sumase a los bomberos en el combate del fuego, que ha devorado poblaciones enteras (al menos 750 viviendas). Las autoridades intentan ahora acceder a las zonas más afectadas y localizar al centenar de personas que siguen desaparecidas. Expertos en la lucha contra el fuego y bomberos visitan los municipios asediados por el fuego para que sus habitantes sepan cómo actuar cuando las llamas lleguen a sus pueblos.

Se teme que el fuego siga vivo durante semanas y es posible que sólo la llegada de la lluvia sea capaz de acabar con esta tragedia. Este lunes las condiciones meteorológicas han mejorado un tanto (han bajado las temperaturas) permitiendo un respiro a los miles de bomberos, apoyados por soldados, que luchan contra las llamas. Pese a todo, al menos 30 focos siguen activos en el Estado de Victoria y varias poblaciones siguen en peligro por las llamas. En los otros dos Estados afectados por los incendios, Nueva Gales del Sur y Australia del Sur, gran parte de los focos han sido controlados o al menos alejados de las áreas residenciales.

Llovía fuego

"Todo está quemado, hasta donde alcanza la vista", explicaba a una emisora local un vecino de Glenburn, a 90 kilómetros al noroeste de Melbourne, la zona más afectada por el fuego."Llovían bolas de fuego del cielo mucho antes de que viéramos la muralla de llamas avanzando entre los árboles", decía a una cadena de televisión otro superviviente de Kinglake. Otros muchos esperan noticias de familiares o amigos desaparecidos en las poblaciones arrasadas por las llamas.

El drama que vive Australia estos días ha superado al vivido durante el llamado Miércoles de Ceniza, en febrero de 1983, que dejó unos 50 muertos en Victoria y otros 28 en Australia del sur. "Ha sido una tragedia absoluta para el Estado y creemos que la cifra sólo empeorará", declaraba el subcomisario de Policía de Victoria, Kieran Walshe. "El infierno con toda su furia ha visitado a las buenas personas de Victoria en las últimas 24 horas. Es una tragedia para la nación", admitía este domingo el primer ministro australiano.

Comisión de investigación

Los incendios forestales son un fenómeno habitual en Australia. Pero este año, la combinación de las altas temperaturas y la seguía ha causado que las llamas se hayan extendido con mayor fuerza y rapidez de lo habitual.

Tal es la gravedad de los incendios, que el Gobierno del Estado de Victoria va a poner en marcha una comisión de investigación, que, según han anunciado, va a abordar de forma amplia todas las circunstancias que rodearon a las causas y los efectos de los incendios, pero también se centrará en hacer una revisión de las políticas gubernamentales contra el fuego.

El ministro principal de Victoria, John Brumby, ha anunciado que "no quedará ninguna piedra por levantar" en la investigación sobre los incendios. "Queremos estar seguros de que cualquier cuestión, cualquier factor, cualquier cosa en relación con este horrible fin de semana, con los horribles incendios del sábado sea investigado y descubierto", ha dicho Brumby.

Calor letal

Cuando el calor supera los 36,7 grados del cuerpo humano, éste ajusta las constantes -ritmo cardiaco y respiratorio, diámetro de venas...- para mantener su temperatura. "Pero si la diferencia es muy grande, desde los 44 o 45 grados, los ajustes pueden fracasar y la temperatura corporal se dispara. Se altera la consciencia y los órganos empiezan a sufrir daños", dice Pedro Villarroel, jefe de urgencias del hospital Clínico de Madrid. Es el golpe de calor, que evoluciona en un fallo multiorgánico, "mortal la mayoría de las veces si no se logra bajar de inmediato la temperatura del cuerpo". Para evitarlo, hay que quedarse en los espacios menos calurosos, hidratarse y evitar todo esfuerzo físico.

La crisis económica pone a prueba la coalición de gobierno en Alemania - El País, es - link (aqui)

Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg- REUTERS


Merkel cambia de ministro de Economía en la peor recesión desde la posguerra

JUAN GÓMEZ - Berlín - 10/02/2009

La canciller alemana, la democristiana Angela Merkel (CDU), se vio forzada ayer a cambiar a su ministro de Economía después de que el socialcristiano Michael Glos (CSU), de 64 años, presentara su dimisión de forma inesperada durante el fin de semana. Un joven político de 37 años, experto en política exterior y compañero de partido de Glos, Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, será su sustituto. Este inesperado cambio en un puesto ministerial clave es fruto de la batalla por el poder que se libra en el bloque de centro-derecha de la coalición liderada por Merkel y pone en evidencia la credibilidad del Gobierno, justo cuando Alemania se enfrenta a la peor recesión desde la Segunda Guerra Mundial y en pleno año electoral.

La marcha de Glos, según los analistas, se debe a su falta de influencia en la política económica del Ejecutivo federal, donde se ha mostrado mucho más fuerte el titular de Finanzas, el socialdemócrata Peer Steinbrück (SPD). Por ello, pocos creen que la llegada de Guttenberg, que hasta el año pasado era poco conocido fuera de Baviera, vaya a producir grandes cambios. "Ha aceptado un trabajo difícil en un momento en el que debemos seguir combatiendo la crisis económica internacional", afirmó ayer Merkel en una conferencia de prensa en Múnich. Guttenberg dijo que estaba preparado para el puesto.

La confusión en torno al reemplazo de Glos es, según los analistas, una prueba de la debilidad de la coalición. Para empezar, Glos dimitió por carta el sábado, cuando la canciller estaba en la Conferencia de Seguridad de Múnich. Sorprende también la reacción del desprevenido Horst Seehofer, presidente de la CSU y primer ministro de Baviera, que no aceptó la dimisión de Glos y dio así pie a un fin de semana de incertidumbre. Por último, también sorprende que llegue al Ministerio de Economía un político joven y experto en política exterior que apenas llevaba unos meses en la secretaría general de la CSU (partido hermano de la CDU de Merkel en Baviera). Este espectáculo llega en plena crisis económica y a siete meses de las elecciones federales.

El éxito de Guttenberg, joven político de ascendencia aristocrática cuyo futuro se veía brillar desde hace tiempo, sorprende por lo precipitado. Un editorialista del diario Süddeutsche Zeitung explica que "está en el Ministerio por dos razones: porque está en el partido indicado y porque proviene de la provincia de Franconia: no se ha considerado si es lo suficientemente competente". Ilustra así el diario las complejidades de la gran coalición entre los democristianos (CDU/CSU) y socialdemócratas (SPD) que gobierna Alemania desde 2005. También las divergencias (por ejemplo, en material fiscal) entre la CSU, que según el pacto de coalición nombra dos ministros federales, con la CDU. En todo caso, Glos (también procedente de Franconia) le deja a su paisano una difícil herencia en uno de los ministerios más difíciles. Basta echar un vitazo a los tres años que ha aguantado Glos con la cartera: ni siquiera la crisis le permitió desligarse de las tradicionales trabas que le imponen los otros ministros. El titular de Finanzas, el socialdemócrata Steinbrück, se ha repartido con Merkel el protagonismo en las espectaculares medidas anticrisis adoptadas por el Gobierno. Sus disputas, más o menos públicas, con Seehofer y con el ministro de Medio Ambiente, Sigmar Gabriel (SPD), han dado titulares desde 2005.

La designación de Guttenberg significa un inesperado empujón a la cura de rejuvenecimiento que le está aplicando Seehofer a su partido. Parte de la misión del joven doctor en Derecho es contribuir a la recuperación de la CSU en Baviera. Guttenberg no viste los trajes regionales a los que la CSU es tan afín y evita el dialecto en sus apariciones públicas, en las que muestra un notable talento retórico. Ahora se enfrenta al examen de oposición y socialdemócratas, que ven en el culebrón del fin de semana un buen flanco para atacar a sus rivales electorales.

Nueva generación

- Guttenberg tiene 37 años y será el ministro de Economía alemán más joven desde la Segunda Guerra Mundial. También es el miembro más joven del Gobierno.

- Es socio de la Unión Social Cristianal (CSU, en sus siglas en alemán), el partido hermano de la Unión Cristianodemócrata (CDU) en Baviera. Su ascenso en el partido ha sido fulgurante.

- Se convirtió en el secretario general de la CSU el año pasado. Es diputado del Bundestag desde 2002.

- Es politólogo y doctor en Derecho, además de experto en Defensa y miembro del Comité de Política Exterior del Parlamento. Pero no fue conocido a nivel nacional hasta que fue elegido secretario general de la CSU.

- Antes de entrar en política se encargaba del negocio de su aristocrática familia (su nombre completo es Karl-Theodor Maria Nikolaus Johann Jacob Philipp Wilhelm Franz Joseph Sylvester barón de Guttenberg).

El Senado de EE UU despeja el camino para votar el plan de estímulo de Obama - El País, es - link (aqui)

La votación definitiva tendrá lugar el martes

AGENCIAS / ELPAIS.com - Washington - 10/02/2009

El Senado de EE UU ha despejado esta noche (madrugada en España) el último obstáculo procedimental que impedía que el millonario plan de estímulo económico ideado por el presidente Barack Obama -cifrado en 827.000 millones de dólares- fuera sometido a votación por la cámara alta. El plan finalmente será votado este martes.

Con 61 votos a favor, uno más de los que se necesitaba, y 36 en contra, el Senado ha aprobado proceder este martes a la votación definitiva del plan, que será armonizado con el que salió de la Cámara de Representantes el pasado 28 de enero, con el fin de enviarlo a la Casa Blanca a más tardar este viernes.

Tres republicanos votan a favor

La votación de hoy pone de relieve la profunda división que lastra el trabajo de las dos cámaras del país, pese al llamamiento a la colaboración realizado por Obama, informa The New York Times. Los senadores Susan Collins y Olimpia J. Snowe, de Maine, y Arlen Spencer, de Pensilvania, que representan el nuevo centrismo dentro del Partido Republicano, votaron a favor del plan junto a los 56 senadores demócratas y a otros dos independientes que habitualmente prestan su apoyo al partido de Obama.

"Estoy orgullosa del trabajo bipartidista que hemos llevado a cabo durante los últimos 10 días", ha expresado Collins, uno de los tres votos cruciales republicanos. "Como el resto de las leyes, éstas no es perfecta, pero puede servir para crear nuevos empleos y afrontar la crisis que afecta a nuestra nación", ha añadido.

Durante el debate de hoy, el líder de la mayoría demócrata en el Senado, Harry Reid, ha instado a los republicanos a que permitieran agilizar la votación final de la medida, dada la gravedad de la crisis económica. "Todos esos millones de estadounidenses que están sin trabajo; todas esas familias que están luchando por no perder sus casas y haciendo todo lo posible para hacer rendir sus ingresos; todos ellos se merecen escuchar cinco palabras del Congreso: la ayuda viene en camino", ha asegurado Reid.

El líder demócrata ha reconocido, sin embargo, que el proyecto de ley ante el Senado no es una panacea para todos los males que aquejan a Estados Unidos, especialmente cuando se trata de un problema que heredó la adminisración Obama.

Por su parte, el senador Edward Kennedy ha destacado que la clase política no necesita más indicadores económicos para percatarse de la seriedad de la crisis, si bien la pérdida de 598.000 empleos en enero pasado, según él, confirma que la economía estadounidense "permanece en caída libre".