sábado, 14 de fevereiro de 2009

Gal Costa e Elis Regina - "Ilusão à Toa"

ilusão à toa
Composição: Johnny Alf

Eu acho engraçado
Quando um certo alguém
Se aproxima de mim
Trazendo exuberância
Que me extasia

Meus olhos sentem
Minhas mãos transpiram
É um amor que eu guardo há muito
Dentro em mim
E é a voz do coração que canta assim
Assim

Olha, somente um dia
Longe dos teus olhos
Trouxe a saudade do amor tão perto
E o mundo inteiro fez-se tão tristonho

Mas embora agora eu tenha perto
Eu acho graça do meu pensamento
A conduzir o nosso amor discreto
Sim, amor discreto pra uma só pessoa
Pois nem de leve sabes que eu te quero
E me apraz essa ilusão à toa

Maria Bethânia - "Esse Cara"

Nara Leão - "Corcovado"

Pai de brasileira que diz ter sido agredida na Suíça afirma 'não saber onde procurar' a prova da gravidez da filha - UOL notícias - link (aqui)


14/02/2009 - 15h07



Do UOL Notícias*
Em São Paulo (SP)

O pai da brasileira que diz ter sido vítima de agressões na Suíça mudou neste sábado (14) seu discurso em relação às provas da gravidez da filha que, na sexta-feira, garantiu ter. "Não sei nem onde procurar", afirmou o pai, visivelmente abalado e dizendo estar há quatro dias sem dormir. Na empresa que havia contratado a brasileira, a Maersk, a constatação é de que Paula em nenhum momento apresentou uma prova de que estava grávida.

O advogado abandonou pela primeira vez as críticas à polícia e afirmou hoje que sua filha está "em grave estado psicológico". Por isso, Paula ainda não foi informada das conclusões da polícia. "Por ordens médicas, Paula ainda não sabe do laudo médico emitido pela polícia", disse o pai. "Em qualquer circunstância, minha filha é vítima. Ou ela é vítima de graves distúrbios psicológicos, ou vítima da agressão que desde o início ela sustenta e eu não tenho motivos ainda para duvidar", disse o pai.

O hospital está mantendo uma enfermeira 24 horas dentro do quarto da brasileira diante de suas condições psicológicas. "Não vamos dizer nada enquanto ela estiver nesse estado", disse o pai.

Ontem, Paulo Oliveira acusou a polícia de estar tentando desviar a atenção ao negar a gravidez da filha. Hoje, questionado sobre se acreditava que ela tinha sido alvo de ataques, ele disse que "minha situação de pai é cuidar da minha filha. Ela está chocada e eu também".

A advogada Paula Oliveira, de 26 anos, afirmou à polícia que havia sido vítima de um ataque na última segunda-feira (9) na periferia de Zurique. Sua versão era de que a agressão cometida por três skinheads teria lhe provocado um aborto. Na sexta-feira, a polícia apresentou seu laudo médico, concluindo que Paula não estava grávida e alertando que privilegiaria a suspeita de que teria mutilado a si própria.

Brasil é criticado
O Brasil é alvo de protestos por causa da suposta agressão contra a advogada Paula Oliveira, em Zurique. Depois que a polícia da Suíça emitiu laudo que desmente a gravidez da brasileira e coloca em dúvida sua versão, o consulado brasileiro na cidade suíça foi inundado por e-mails e fax de cidadãos suíços acusando autoridades, mídia e a sociedade de terem classificado o caso como ato de xenofobia.

As autoridades suíças insistiram com o governo brasileiro de que "vão até o fim" nas investigações, enquanto os jornais suíços destacaram a suposta farsa. Mas, para o Itamaraty, a decisão de pressionar os suíços por uma resposta era o que tinha de ser feito. "Os suíços querem limpar a imagem do país e nos disseram claramente que vão buscar uma solução ao caso, seja onde esteja a verdade", afirmou a cônsul do Brasil em Zurique, Vitória Clever. Para o governo suíço, que teve seu embaixador no Brasil convocado pelo chanceler Celso Amorim, o esclarecimento do caso virou um ponto de honra.

O consulado ainda confirmou que Paula teria uma consulta marcada para o dia seguinte em que foi agredida. O consulado orientou a família para que contrate um advogado, caso quisesse atacar o laudo da polícia. Oliveira foi categórico e rejeitou que contrataria um advogado. Ele nega que a possibilidade de viajar tenha sido pensada. "Não temos porque fugir", disse. Mas ele confirmou que, assim que sua filha for autorizada, irá voltar ao Brasil.

Reação
Na imprensa suíça e nas ruas de Zurique, o sentimento é de que as autoridades reagiram de forma exagerada ao convocar o embaixador da Suíça em Brasília para dar explicações. "Nenhum jornal suíço acredita na versão de Paula", afirmou Benno Kahlin, jornalista do tabloide sensacionalista Sonntag Blick.

Mas especialistas alertam que o esforço das autoridades suíças no caso também pode esconder uma situação de um mal-estar no país. Em apenas cinco anos, mais de 200 casos de ataques racistas foram registrados e Jean Ziegler, sociólogo e ex-deputado, confirma que partidos de extrema-direita estão usado o racismo como "instrumento político".

Entre a população de Zurique, o sentimento é de que "houve uma generalização perigosa" da imagem da Suíça como um país racista. "Claro que existe racismo aqui e claro que os ataques ocorrem contra estrangeiros. Mas não se pode julgar as coisas antes dos fatos", afirmou Hans Stumpfli, um morador de Zurique de 54 anos. "Se for confirmado que foi uma farsa, nossa imagem vai para o buraco", afirmou Irene Zwetsh, do Conselho Brasileiro de Cultura na Suíça, entidade que promove a integração de brasileiros no país.

Alguns dos centenas de e-mails recebido pelo consulado tinham um tom agressivo. A cônsul do Brasil em Zurique, Vitória Clever, confirmou que está recebendo "toneladas" de mensagens atacando o Brasil. "Alguns nos acusam de ter dado um tratamento indevido ao caso", afirmou. A passeata que a comunidade brasileira estava pensando em organizar para hoje foi desmobilizada.

O Brasil, porém, não é o único a passar por essa situação. Na França, uma menina judia mobilizou o país ao apresentar sinais de agressão. O incidente, mais tarde, foi desmentido por ela mesmo. Na Alemanha, uma mulher foi condenada por ter fingido em 2007 ser sido atacada por neonazistas. A cônsul Vitória Clever admite que a situação toda "é muito triste". "Temos uma relação bilateral com a Suíça", afirmou. Ela insiste, porém, que o Itamaraty agiu corretamente em sair em defesa da brasileira e exigir uma resposta da polícia. "Eles só deram uma resposta por causa de nossa atuação", disse.

*Com informações da Agência Estado

Comercial antigo - Toddynho

Charge do dia



Paixão - Gazeta do Povo - Curitiba, PR

Agression raciste à Zurich: l'affaire se dégonfle - swissinfo.ch - link (aqui)

Le commandant de la police Philipp Hotzenkoecherler et le médecin légiste Walter Bär lors de la conférence des presse des autorités zurichoises. (Keystone)


La gare de Stettbach où se serait déroulée l'agression. (Keystone)


La photo de la présumée victime diffusée par la famille. ((privado))

samedi 14.02.2009

La Brésilienne trouvée tailladée lundi à Zurich n'était pas enceinte et s'est vraisemblablement automutilée. C'est la piste privilégiée par l'Institut de médecine légale de l'Université de Zurich. L'enquête n'est toutefois pas close.

Le médecin responsable des analyses médico-légales, le professeur Walter Bär, a parlé «d'un cas d'école» devant les médias vendredi à Zurich. Dans tous les livres de médecine médico-légale, on trouve des exemples de telles automutilations.

La Brésilienne a de nombreuses entailles superficielles sur les bras, les jambes, le cou et le ventre. Toutes se trouvent dans des régions du corps qu'elle a pu atteindre elle-même, a expliqué Walter Bär.

Zones sensibles évitées

Aucune blessure ne se trouve dans un endroit particulièrement sensible comme les seins ou le pubis. Toutes sont par ailleurs de forme semblable et ont vraisemblablement été assénées avec une sorte de couteau. A certains endroits on peut lire les initiales SVP (pour Union démocratique du centre / droite nationaliste en allemand), ont constaté les experts.

Ces observations ont été intégrées à l'enquête, a déclaré le commandant de la police municipale zurichoise Philip Hotzenköcherle, qui ne veut tirer aucune conclusion définitive pour l'instant. «Nous continuons à explorer toutes les pistes possibles», a-t-il tenu à préciser. Pour des raisons tactiques, la police ne veut pas donner plus d'information pour l'instant.

La jeune femme a indiqué aux policiers qu'elle a été agressée par trois inconnus dans la gare de Zurich-Stettbach lundi soir. Suite à cela, elle aurait fait une fausse couche dans les toilettes de la gare, a-t-elle raconté. La police a été alertée par une personne à qui la femme a demandé de l'aide.

L'enquête n'a pas permis de confirmer la grossesse. La femme n'était pas enceinte le soir de la prétendue agression, ont constaté les médecins. Walter Bär n'exclut toutefois pas qu'elle ait pu l'être auparavant.

Cas semblable à Paris

La jeune Brésilienne, toujours hospitalisée, ne serait pas la première à s'être mutilée et à prétendre être victime d'une agression à caractère xénophobe. L'affaire rappelle le cas d'une autre jeune femme qui avait affirmé avoir été victime d'une attaque antisémite en été 2004 dans un train à Paris.

On l'avait retrouvée avec un t-shirt déchiré et une croix gammée peinte sur le ventre. La femme de 23 ans avait aussi déclaré que les agresseurs avaient renversé le landau de son enfant de 13 mois.

La police zurichoise avait décidé de ne pas informer tout de suite le public sur le cas de la jeune Brésilienne, car trop d'éléments restaient peu clairs. Mais des photos des blessures sont parues dans des médias de son pays. Ces derniers ont prétendu que la femme avait été victime d'une attaque néonazie et ont reproché à la police d'avoir mal travaillé.

«La Suisse est sûre»

C'est pourquoi la police a organisé une conférence de presse vendredi à Zurich. Celle-ci était à plusieurs égards exceptionnelle. Les propos des intervenants ont été traduits simultanément et mot à mot en portugais pour les médias brésiliens présents.

La responsable municipale de la police, Esther Maurer, y a par ailleurs pris la parole pour défendre le travail des enquêteurs et tenter de corriger la mauvaise image que le cas a donné de la ville à l'étranger. «Je regrette qu'on ait pu avoir l'impression qu'il règne un climat xénophobe en Suisse.»

Les Zurichois et les Suisses sont tolérants, a déclaré l'élue socialiste. «Notre pays est sûr pour les étrangers comme pour les Suisses. Tous les Brésiliens et les Brésiliennes sont cordialement bienvenus chez nous».

swissinfo avec les agences

La Brésilienne trouvée tailladée s'est probablement automutilée - La Liberté, ch - link (aqui)





ZURICH • Elle se disait victime d'une agression ayant provoqué une fausse couche. Premier mystère: cette femme n'était pas enceinte.
(photo Keystone)
















La femme brésilienne trouvée tailladée lundi à Zurich n'était pas enceinte et s'est vraisemblablement automutilée. C'est la piste privilégiée par l'Institut de médecine légale de l'Université de Zurich. L'enquête n'est toutefois pas close.Le médecin responsable des analyses médico-légales, le professeur Walter Bär, a parlé «d'un cas d'école» devant les médias hier à Zurich. Dans tous les livres de médecine médico-légale, on trouve des exemples de telles automutilations.

L'enquête continue


La Brésilienne a de nombreuses entailles superficielles sur les bras, les jambes, le cou et le ventre. Toutes se trouvent dans des régions du corps qu'elle a pu atteindre elle-même, a expliqué M. Bär.Aucune blessure ne se trouve dans un endroit particulièrement sensible comme les seins ou le pubis. Toutes sont par ailleurs de forme semblable et ont vraisemblablement été assénées avec une sorte de couteau. A certains endroits, on peut lire les initiales SVP (UDC en allemand), ont constaté les experts.Ces observations ont été intégrées à l'enquête, a déclaré le commandant de la Police municipale zurichoise Philip Hotzenköcherle, qui ne veut tirer aucune conclusion définitive pour l'instant. «Nous continuons à explorer toutes les pistes possibles», a-t-il tenu à préciser. Pour des raisons tactiques, la police ne veut pas donner plus d'informations pour l'instant.La jeune femme a indiqué aux policiers qu'elle a été agressée par trois inconnus dans la gare de Zurich-Stettbach lundi soir. Suite à cela, elle aurait fait une fausse couche dans les toilettes de la gare, a-t-elle raconté. La police a été alertée par une personne à qui la femme a demandé de l'aide.L'enquête n'a pas permis de confirmer la grossesse. La femme n'était pas enceinte le soir de la prétendue agression, ont constaté les médecins. M. Bär n'exclut toutefois pas qu'elle ait pu l'être auparavant.

Cas semblable à Paris


La jeune Brésilienne, toujours hospitalisée, ne serait pas la première à s'être mutilée et à prétendre être victime d'une agression à caractère xénophobe. L'affaire rappelle le cas d'une autre jeune femme qui avait affirmé avoir été victime d'une attaque antisémite en été 2004 dans un train à Paris.On l'avait retrouvée avec un tee-shirt déchiré et une croix gammée peinte sur le ventre. La femme de 23 ans avait aussi déclaré que les agresseurs avaient renversé le landau de son enfant de 13 mois.La police zurichoise avait décidé de ne pas informer tout de suite le public sur le cas de la jeune Brésilienne, car trop d'éléments restaient peu clairs. Mais des photos des blessures sont parues dans des médias de son pays. Ces derniers ont prétendu que la femme avait été victime d'une attaque néonazie et ont reproché à la police d'avoir mal travaillé.C'est pourquoi la police a organisé une conférence de presse hier à Zurich. Celle-ci était à plusieurs égards exceptionnelle. Les propos des intervenants ont été traduits simultanément et mot à mot en portugais pour les médias brésiliens présents.La responsable municipale de la police, Esther Maurer, y a par ailleurs pris la parole pour défendre le travail des enquêteurs et tenter de corriger la mauvaise image que le cas a donné de la ville à l'étranger. «Je regrette qu'on ait pu avoir l'impression qu'il règne un climat xénophobe en Suisse.»Les Zurichois et les Suisses sont tolérants, a déclaré la socialiste. «Notre pays est sûr pour les étrangers comme pour les Suisses. Tous les Brésiliens et les Brésiliennes sont cordialement bienvenus chez nous.»

ATS

The still divine Bette Midler - The Times, uk - link (aqui)


February 14, 2009

Bette Midler is famed for her brash, camp stage and screen persona. But the Divine Miss M tells Tim Teeman that she had to fight her father and a stultifying childhood to achieve her showbusiness dream. Now, if only Meryl Streep would kindly step aside...


Bette Midler.

It's only since she turned 60 that her swearing has become really bad, Bette Midler insists. When George W. Bush passed her Upper East Side apartment in a motorcade, she knocked her doorman aside and screamed: “Get the hell out of my neighbourhood.” She said “arsehole” on Loose Women earlier this week. “I did? I thought that was allowed,” she says in mock-horror. She said “bullshit” on another show. “That was live?” she says, feigning ignorance. “It's the English language. You made it up, I didn't.”

This is all said in the camp growl that the Divine Miss M has made her trademark. She is dressed daintily, in sensible skirt and cardigan, her hair a whipped peak but restrained: a demure transformation from the sequins, feathers and more sequins and more feathers she sports in the Showgirl Must Go On spectacular that she is currently performing in Las Vegas. Midler, 63, has a new “best of” album out, including her famous hit from the movie Beaches, The Wind Beneath My Wings, and also From a Distance and The Rose.

To promote it she performed From A Distance alongside a skating Torvill and Dean on Dancing on Ice. “Eugggh,” she says, looking down. “I was as sick as a dog with jetlag. Those two kids started dancing and it was crazy, a vision. My teeth were chattering it was so cold.”

Ensconced in the luxury of the Connaught Hotel in Mayfair, she doesn't seem a diva (the only thing she asks for is green tea served at “the right” temperature). Her speech swoops all over the place, peppered with indiscriminate wisecracks, exclamations and riffs (on the plethora of wires and cables in her life and her bafflement with computer technology, for example).

She reveals that as a little girl growing up in Hawaii, she never imagined becoming a singer . “I thought I would be an actorrrr. I thought I'd be Ethel Barrymore. I didn't know who she was, but she was my idea of an actorrrr. It seemed it would be more fun to be someone else rather than myself.”

Didn't she like herself? “Not particularly. We were very poor, it was a hard-scrabble childhood, not particularly happy. The best part was nature, which is so intense there. The sky is bright blue, the clouds are puffy, the grass is lush, it feels like you can touch the stars. But the people were not very nice. I was a white kid in a mostly Asian neighbourhood. You heard Hawaii was a great melting pot? Hooey. I had a very strong fantasy life.” She stops and looks askance like Wile E. Coyote after he's just run over the cliff. “Sorry, what was the question? I'm bonkers. Where am I? Who am I? I love your socks.”

The rich fantasy life nourished her desire to escape a stultifying home life. “My parents (mother Ruth a seamstress, father Fred a painter) were not encouraging. My father put everybody down. Yeah, it was a real drag but he had his moments. His saving grace was a wicked sense of humour. He was a good provider. They were a team. They were at Pearl Harbour, they knew hardship. My mum was supportive, she had a tinge of showbiz fever and named me and my sisters after Hollywood icons. My dad was like, ‘Get a job'. But that gave me something to fight against.

“I battled with him to the end, but we made our peace. I miss them both very much. As whacked out as they were, I loved them. But I'm curious about how private they were. They never spoke of their adventures, misfortunes, dreams ... they rarely spoke about the war. But look how well I turned out. I wish some things had gone differently in my life, but my daughter [Sophie, 22] and my husband [Martin] are healthy, I have a lot to be thankful for. I'm not unlike them. I very much live in the present. If I don't take a picture, I don't have a clue.”

What does she wish had gone differently in her life? “A couple of things I wish I hadn't bought,” she says, grimacing. “Land. I'm an open-space person. I'm not a believer in sprawl. I don't particularly care for postmodern architecture. I believe in solid fare and building fair. I'm green to the core. This group I run in New York bought 60 community gardens and helped another group to buy 55 in congested neighbourhoods. I'm doing a similar thing in Hawaii, but it's harder there, the tracts are so big and there are these things about road zoning, dams, reservoirs ...” She clenches her palms to her head. “Oh, my God! Holy cow!”

Her parents left New Jersey for Hawaii. She couldn't leave Hawaii fast enough. “I had rock fever. Now I can't wait to go back there. I've had my fill of big cities.”

Midler attended only three terms at the University of Hawaii, where she had “no idea what anyone was talking about”. Now she adores history and poetry but not fiction (“Real life is so much more shocking”) and says she wishes she had been better educated. “I'm glad my daughter [who studied sociology at university] has been. I sometimes think I should go back to school to learn French and music, but who would have me?” Is she kidding? Oxford and Cambridge, get in line.

In New York in the Sixties she couldn't get acting work. “Nobody was acting, everyone was singing or playing the guitar.” She sang in musicals and this bit of her life sounds like CC Bloom's, her character in Beaches, roughing it out before the big time struck. “Yes, absolutely,” Midler says. “I think [the author of the original book] Iris Rainer Dart based a lot of it on my life. She never admitted it, but it's entirely possible.”

It's well documented that in 1970 Midler began singing at the Continental Baths, a gay bathhouse, accompanied by Barry Manilow on piano, earning her the moni-ker Bathhouse Betty. Did she sing while men around her were having sex? “I've never been to a sex orgy in my entire life,” she says, mock-offended. “Studio 54 was way worse than the baths.” So nothing happened? “What do you mean nothing happened?” she shoots back. “I was riveting. Yes, it was a place where gay men met and had sex. I didn't see that. Someone sent me a picture showing me in a 1930s costume with my hair pulled back and all these cute young men in bathrobes watching me. It seemed very innocent. I would stand at the top of a little staircase with a towel round my head and act out whacked-out movie heroines. Patti LaBelle played there, too. I wasn't there long, but I was there long enough to make a splash, ha-ha.”

The longevity of her career is surely a lot down to her gay fans. “Thank God for the gays,” she says. Without them? “I don't know what would have happened but I know what did happen. Good for them and good for me.”

In 1971 she starred in the first professional production of Tommy; two years later Manilow produced her first album The Divine Miss M, a nickname that's stuck. In 1974 she won a Tony for a revue, and in 1979 secured a Best Actress Oscar nomination for her role as a drug-addicted rock star in The Rose. Her film career took off in the mid-80s with a raft of Disney movies, including Ruthless People, Down and Out in Beverly Hills and, of course, Beaches, about the relationship between two women played by Midler and Barbara Hershey.

“I love Barbara and Lainie Kazan [who played CC's mother].” Did she know it would become an uber-weepie? She bristles, smiling. “I had no idea it was an ‘uberweepie'! The nerve! It wasn't so bad. I co-produced it. It was a pretty damned good screenplay.” (Too true, it leaves me in molten pieces every time I watch it.) Midler thought it was “just another movie. I didn't think of it as a women's picture. I was so excited to be able to sing again and have a soundtrack.”

And Wind Beneath My Wings? “It's really grown on me,” she says measuredly. “When I first heard it, I said, ‘I'm not singing that song', but the friend who gave it to me said, ‘If you don't sing it I'll never speak to you again', so of course I had to sing the damned song. Whatever reservations I might have had I certainly don't have any more.”

Midler sang it many times after 9/11, and it has become “part of me, like an old friend” (which reminds me of the first lines of another favourite Midler song, The Glory of Love). She has occasionally had miserable times on movies. The Stepford Wives remake was “movie-making by committee”. Hocus Pocus was her favourite film because she “completely disappeared” into character. “I'd love to have that opportunity again, but I'm a certain age and I've made my peace with that.”

Is Midler as brash as she appears? “Of course not. It's a f***ing act! Who knew!” But the feathers? “I do have a real weakness for that,” she says contritely. “I love sparkly, shiny things.” Midler says she doesn't mind ageing: her husband threw her 60th birthday party in a deconsecrated synagogue. “My birthday cake was a sliced ham,” she roars, “because that's what he thinks I am.”

She is “kind of healthy but has a little bit of arthritis, my eyes are a little shaky. I drank a little, I didn't do drugs to any great extent. I do get depressed but not like you do if you drink or do drugs. I have pretty bad melancholia, but I've found you can get rid of that by exercising.” She has therapy. “A lot of people don't love what they do and I do. I still love music and I love, love, love to dance. For most women - I can't speak for men - I'd say dancing is the key to happiness.”

Of the future, she says very seriously that she wants “world peace. Please. Just for my sake, before I go.” She also hopes that Meryl Streep “has the good taste to step aside and let the rest of us have a crack ... but I know she won't. She has a really good agent. She's great, but I know there are some ladies

behind her saying, ‘Meryl, for God's sake, do you have to say yes to everything?'”

Not only might she return to university, she wants to go solo on stage with a ukulele that she is learning to play. “I love the idea of not having a band. It would just be me, the audience and a ukelele in my hand.” But hopefully still incorporating those vital sequins and feathers.

The Best Bette is out on Rhino Records

Lloyds Banking Group rocked by shock losses in HBOS - The Times, uk - link (aqui)


February 14, 2009

Embarrassment for Brown as Lloyds shares slump


Shareholders' bill for Lloyds shotgun wedding | Cummings earned more than the boss | The man who broke HBOS with a £7bn loss | Britain’s bankers plumb new depths

Taxpayers could have to spend billions bailing out the banks again after massive and unexpected losses were disclosed by Britain’s new superbank.

Shares in Lloyds Banking Group fell 32 per cent to 61.4p yesterday after it reported losses of £10 billion in HBOS, making it worth far less than thought when it was taken over in November.

The news, a huge embarrassment for Gordon Brown, who helped to broker the deal, triggered speculation that the bank will have to come back to the Government for more capital.

George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, suggested that the cash pumped in for the first bailout in October was “all but wiped out” by these losses. He said: “HBOS bankers like James Crosby bear a heavy responsibility, but so too does his ally Gordon Brown who created the system of bank regulation that allowed this reckless risk-taking to run amok.”

Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, defended his role in helping to push through the takeover, saying: “We had a matter of days and then hours to stop the entire banking system collapsing.”

The timing of the profits warning to the Stock Exchange was particularly embarrassing the Lloyds chief, Eric Daniels, who gave no hint of it three days ago when he was grilled by MPs on the Treasury Select Committee.

Lloyds said that it had only just appreciated the scale of the problem, having completed the purchase on January 19. The losses were £1.6 billion worse than Lloyds expected in November when it gave shareholders its reasons for buying HBOS.

The Government put £17 billion into the banks just before the deal was completed and owns 43 per cent of the enlarged Lloyds. That stake is now worth £8.3 billion less, a loss equivalent to 2½p on income tax. The brunt of the losses were incurred in HBOS’s corporate division, which was investing in property-backed deals long after other banks had stopped. It lost £7 billion. Peter Cummings, who headed the division, is said to have left in January with a payoff of about £660,000 and a £6 million pension pot.

John McFall, chairman of the select committee, said its inquiry showed that due diligence checks should be at the centre of any takeover. Mr Daniels had admitted that he had not been able to conduct as much of it as he would have liked. “That is now shown to be a massive understatement,” Mr McFall said.

Doubts grow over skinhead 'knife attack' on Brazilian woman - The Guardian, uk - link (aqui)


Claims that racist gang carved initials of rightwing Swiss party into pregnant lawyer start to unravel

It was an attack that shocked two ­nations — a 26-year-old Brazilian woman living in Zurich claimed to have been attacked by racist skinheads who carved the initials of Switzerland's main rightwing party into her body and caused her to miscarry her unborn twins.

When news reached Brazil earlier this week, the foreign minister, Celso Amorim, condemned the assault as "grave" and "shocking" and called in the Swiss envoy. The president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, said: "We want people to respect Brazilians overseas in the same way that we respect them here. We cannot accept and stay silent faced with such a level of violence against a Brazilian woman overseas."

The story was splashed across newspapers under headlines such as The Marks of Intolerance, and led most television bulletins.

But today, Paula Oliviera's story appeared to be unravelling. Swiss authorities said she was not pregnant when the attack was alleged to have happened. And according to medical experts, she may well have cut herself. The head of Zurich University's forensic medicine department, Walter Baer, said that "any experienced forensic doctor would not hesitate to assume that this was a case of self-infliction".

Chastened by the sudden twist to the episode, Brazilian officials were silent. A member of Lula's press office said the presidency would not make any official comment on the case, adding that it appeared to have taken on "new dimensions". A spokesman for Brazil's foreign ministry said it would "wait for the end of the investigation before making new statements".

Oliviera, a 26-year-old lawyer, told Zurich police she was attacked by three skinheads, one with a Nazi symbol tattooed on the back of his head, outside a Zurich train station on Monday. Pictures have shown her stomach and legs scarred with the initials of the rightwing Swiss People's party (SVP).

The woman's family told the Brazilian media she had been speaking Portuguese outside Stettbach train station shortly before the attack.

All week, Oliviera has been interviewed from her hospital bed by police and forensic experts. Her fiance said she was suffering from nightmares. "She woke up sweating and screaming," said Marco Trepp.

Police have appealed for witnesses and say they have spoken to three men who were near the scene of the alleged attack but that no one was arrested.

The SVP won 29% of the vote in the last election and is known for its anti-immigration stance.

During the 2007 election, its poster showed white sheep kicking a black sheep out of Switzerland. It caused international outrage.

A spokesman for the party, Oskar Freysinger, condemned the alleged attack and denied any involvement. "If that really was someone from our party, we wouldn't hesitate for a second. That person would be immediately kicked out," he said.

Clint Eastwood: 'Eighty? It's just a number' - The Guardian, uk - link (aqui)

It's too late for vanity' ... Clint Eastwood. Photograph: Koji Sasahara/AP


Emma Brockes meets Clint Eastwood, one of the last American heroes, to talk about films, politics, ageing ... and the truth about that Spike Lee spat

Emma Brockes

The Guardian, Saturday 14 February 2009

People who have worked with Clint Eastwood invariably talk about the first time he rang and the effect of his creaky, whispery voice on their nervous system. In a studio on the Warner Brothers lot in Burbank, California, his arrival is counted down in paces between the coffee urn and the biscuit tray, while outside people queue for a chatshow next door and executives glide to lunch in their golf buggies. Eastwood enters with an awkward, loping gait, as from another era. He has made films of every stripe in the past 10 years, but for most of us he will always be that man: who starts a fight in a saloon, who defends a lady's honour, who, now that Paul Newman is gone, is one of the last American heroes. Or, as he puts it with conscientious self-mockery and a flash of his green, green eyes, "the jerk from the plains".

  1. Gran Torino
  2. Release: 2008
  3. Countries: Rest of the world, USA
  4. Cert (UK): 15
  5. Runtime: 116 mins
  6. Directors: Clint Eastwood
  7. Cast: Ahney Her, Bee Vang, Christopher Carley, Clint Eastwood, John Carroll Lynch
  8. More on this film

Longevity in Hollywood can inspire embarrassing devotion and Eastwood, heading towards 80, finds much of what comes his way unseemly. Men have a hard time comporting themselves in his presence; women make regrettable observations about his green eyes. The myth is so established, one forgets that in the 60s and early 70s, he made a lot of schlocky, forgettable westerns as well as classics such as The Good, The Bad And The Ugly. The cowboy, marshal or gunslinger whose idea of showing emotion is to shift a cigar from one side of his mouth to the other is a heroic type we are supposed to have outgrown. And yet the glamour persists, entwined as it is with ideas of what it is to be American and a nostalgia, perhaps, for less officious eras. Eastwood didn't say much in those films, but what he did say - "You didn't hear the lady, did you, boy?", "Cool it, cowboy", "Next time I'll knock your damn head off" - compacted over time into legend. Even the most banal line - "Put your pants on, chief" - was transformed by Eastwood's growl into something sounding like wisdom.

Today he settles in his director's chair with the cool, polite detachment he reserves, one imagines, for outlaws and journalists. There are spots of high colour on his cheeks that make him look, oddly, rather vulnerable and take the menace out of his pointy incisors. Eastwood's tough-guy image was always leavened by something soft at the edges, the beauty spot above his lip, the fact that he was, throughout the 60s, very obviously a man who got as much use out of his hairdryer as Warren Beatty. He worked hard to break the mould of that early career in a way he now jokes about. Eastwood is about to cast for a film about Nelson Mandela, adapted from John Carlin's book, and when I ask who will play him, he looks devilish and says, "I'm going to play him. I'm going to show you my versatility." (It will actually be Morgan Freeman. "Perfect casting for Mandela.")

One way or another, Eastwood's interests always seem to come back to the issue of heroism, particularly to the unsympathetic hero. In his new film, Gran Torino, he plays Walt Kowalski, a trigger-happy, cantankerous old bigot (imagine if Henry Fonda in On Golden Pond had been armed) who learns over time to love his Korean neighbours more than his petulant family and to make a great sacrifice for them. It sounds corny, but it's a better film than Million Dollar Baby, the sentimental Oscar-winner he directed in 2004 and in which he played a similar role. Once Eastwood stops snarling and overacting - a pitfall of directing oneself - he turns in a touching performance and the film is funny and moving and unexpectedly shocking. Did he want to play Walt from the off?

"Yeah."

Yeah?

"Yeah."

Right. Eventually, he continues: "Yeah, I liked the dilemmas he had to go through. I liked the message of antique America that is maybe obsolete. Walt may be obsolete." He laughs gently. "But he does learn new things. And that's what makes it interesting. You take a guy who's way out opinionated, insulting to equal opportunity" - this sounds like a phrase he's had to adjust to - "an insulter, and you put him with people where he's antagonistic as hell. And then all of a sudden he looks in the mirror and says, 'I have more in common with these people than my own spoilt, rotten family.' He's realising these folks like having him around, even though he's not particularly on the surface likable."

The film nervously calibrates Walt's bigotry by going overboard with examples of affectionate racial mockery between Irish, Italians and Poles to show that, you know, there are levels to these things. I ask whether he was anxious about getting this tone right. "I wasn't anxious about anything. I figure one thing when you get to my age is, what can they do to ya?" Likewise, he bats away being overlooked at the Oscars. Gran Torino was number one at the US box office but didn't get a single nomination. "I have had three films nominated out of the last five I've made. I just make the film the best I can. The rest is political stuff and posturing. I'm not terribly good at that. I think our message was as good as any message out there this year. There we are."

At some point, the reticence of Dirty Harry and Joe Kidd turned into the old-age misanthropy of Walt Kowalski and Frankie Dunn, and when, in 2000, Eastwood made Space Cowboys with Tommy Lee Jones and Donald Sutherland, the joke was it should have been called Grumpy Old Astronauts. At 78, he is still wiry and tough looking, but his posture is bad and his famous whisper sounds, occasionally, like the frailty of age. "Eighty is just a number," he says. "A lot of people are old at 40." No twinges of vanity when he sees himself on screen? "It's too late for vanity. If I was 30, maybe, I'd say, 'Hey, that's not a good angle.' But there is no good angle now. So you just kinda accept it and go ahead."

Eastwood is kept young, perhaps, by his family; he has seven children who range in age from 12 to their early 40s. The 12-year-old daughter, Morgan, lives with him and his second wife, Dina Ruiz, a former TV anchorwoman from Arizona. He married his first wife, Maggie Johnson, when he was 21 and had two children with her. They didn't divorce for 30 years, during which time he had a child with Roxanne Tunis, two with Jacelyn Reeves and one with Frances Fisher, while conducting a long relationship with the actor Sondra Locke. I wonder if Morgan thinks he's cool or embarrassing. Eastwood looks surprised. "I think she thinks I'm a cool dad. We get along very well. I have a teenage daughter as well. And I think they think I'm all right. I'm not totally objective. I don't think they think of me as a guy who should be their grandfather. I used to joke about it: that my kids didn't give me any grand- children, so I just had my own grandchildren."

One imagines that being the son of Clint Eastwood throws up very particular problems, as being the daughter of some icon of femininity might for a girl. I ask if his sons have had a tougher time of it than his daughters. "Maybe. Maybe not. I don't think so." He pauses. "Maybe." Another long pause. "I don't think they need to get screwed up. The parents have to keep instilling in them the logic of life. Not everyone becomes a known figure. There's disadvantages to it and there's advantages to it. Don't try to make it any more than it is." This isn't, of course, something he can entirely control, the way his fame affects his children. "You're never in total control. But you have to have ambitions to set the agenda and fate does the rest."

Control is a big thing for Eastwood, whose "logic of life" is deeply entwined with his Libertarian politics, which he brings up with a wry smile, taking into account that most people think Libertarianism is at best unrealistic and at worst crackpot. He registered as a Republican in 1951 in support of Eisenhower, whom he admired for his second world war heroism and election promise to end the war in Korea. Eastwood's short tenure as mayor of Carmel, the town south of San Francisco where he lives, was premised, he told the New Yorker, on "doing things for people who can't stand up for themselves". Since then, he says, the Republican party has lost its way - he was not in favour of going to war in Iraq, and the evangelical side of the party annoys him. "The only thing John McCain and I really agreed upon was that the Republicans had lost their way because they lost their philosophy." The core of that philosophy, he says, is that "people should be responsible for themselves and fiscal responsibility is very, very important." He says of the current economic crisis: "The great saying that if you don't pay attention to history you're doomed to repeat it is pretty much true. Pretty much true. Now we're repeating it. You get what you deserve."

For the election, his wife registered as an independent, although, he says, they both thought, "Obama seemed like a nice guy." And Eastwood? "I registered," he smiles, "Libertarian. I like the philosophies. The Libertarian party is nothing and they don't have any candidates. But I do believe if we just leave everybody alone, quit trying to think of ways to run everybody else's life, maybe we'd be better off. It may be impractical. It may be obsolete, that kind of thinking." He looks off into the distance: "It's just kinda the way I was raised."

Eastwood's long-term vision about his career was unusual both in its accuracy and the tenacity with which he pursued it. In his early 30s, he could see that if he carried on making westerns they would get worse and he would eventually fall out of fashion. The way to save himself was to diversify. He is a pianist and has written the scores for many of his films, but it was to directing that he turned. He had campaigned to direct episodes of Rawhide, the TV series that started his career; the studio refused, but finally, in 1971, he was given Play Misty For Me, a low-budget film about a woman stalking a local radio star. Misty is still a tense, well-managed thriller today, although there is a self-indulgent bit where the character played by Eastwood and his girlfriend frolic on a beach, in a wood and under a waterfall, that would presage overlong sequences in many of his films. Directing, he says, is the greater joy. "You're the storyteller. As an actor you're just involved with the one component, your component. And your relationship to the ensemble. I prefer directing. I have to. I'm at the age where I should. So."

Eastwood is not a shouter on set; his is a quiet authority. Apart from Spike Lee, no one in the industry seems to have a bad word for him. He is said to be gentlemanly to a fault, professional, deeply engaged. He is also disinclined to censor himself. It is customary when making a film based on a novel not to bad-mouth the source material. In 1995 he made The Bridges Of Madison County, one of the directing roles that, with Unforgiven, raised his profile as a serious director; he called Robert James Waller's novel "fancy, pretentious writing" that he had "fought" to get through. His tiff with Spike Lee last year followed Lee's accusations that Eastwood did not include any black soldiers in his second world war film Flags Of Our Fathers, the story of the men who raised the US flag after the battle of Iwo Jima. It is a bleak, beautiful film that seems to go on for several days and, amid all the battle scenes, exploits what Eastwood has always done best: stillness. He replied that Lee should "shut his face" - the film was historically accurate. Now he says, "It wasn't really a tiff. I was in Cannes and somebody said that he was quoted saying this and that. Some journalist. And I said, well if he said that... and I shot my mouth off. But he's a nice guy. I think Spike was just trying to promote his flick. I understand the game." He grins. "I just thought I wasn't going to let him off the hook."

He won't speculate on how he has influenced cinema, or who he considers to be the heirs to Dirty Harry or Josey Wales. Jason Bourne, perhaps, although he gets too weepy over his dead girlfriend. Eastwood never betrayed an interior life beyond the hint of a secret sadness. He never fell for the posse mentality, and even when he was playing a cop, he was as suspicious of the law as of the outlaws - in Hang 'Em High, a judge admonishes his Marshal Jedediah Cooper: "You can be the best I've ever had, the best there is, if you remember this: you work for the government. You work for justice." His characters didn't work for anyone, of course, which is why we'll always love them. For his own inspiration, he says, he looked to John Wayne and Gary Cooper, "old-time movie actors. I was influenced by James Cagney a lot. I liked his inner vitality. And he was fearless. Not afraid to do crazy things, take a grapefruit in the face. I've always felt that suited me as well."

What is that, not being afraid to fail? "I think it's just... not being afraid." He quotes FDR - "The only thing to fear is fear itself" - then repeats it in a silly voice, to show he isn't that pompous. "Anyway, it was like that mentality. Yeah, I'll just barge in, make that commitment, go for it, otherwise you miss great opportunities to enjoy yourself and have fun and create characters that are interesting. Sometimes you have to swing hard and miss the ball. But you have to swing hard."

Given his fame, Eastwood has an unusually sensible attitude. He hasn't burned out, or become an addict, or cast himself against women half his age. There's no great mystery to it, he says. "Just stacking up information. Not forgetting it." He drops his voice even lower than his usual whisper and leans in. "Not forgetting." His eyes really are very green.

• Gran Torino is released on Friday.

Muséifiées - zoumzoum.blogs.liberation - Libération, fr - link (aqui)

• f l a s h • A N D Y F R E E B E R G •

En Russie regardez, les gardiennes de musée deviennent des oeuvres d'art ! En tout cas, on dirait qu'elles subissent une sorte de "métamorphose" que l'on voit dans leur pose, leur expression, ou dans le choix de leur vêtements colorés et accessoires, pour prendre place à côté des chefs d'oeuvre qu'elles sont censées surveiller. Car dans le fond, ces chefs d'oeuvre-là ne quittent jamais leur poste (à moins d'un prêt, mais il y a toujours un mot d'excuse), alors qu'elles le soir quittent leur satut de chef d'oeuvre ! ...


Le photographe Andy Freeberg qui a réalisé cette série Guardians dans les quatre plus grands musées de Russie a le chic du cliché '"cartoonesque" pour saisir les "petites mains" du milieu de l'art. Ainsi, en 2007 avec sa série Sentry, sur les bureaux d'entrée des galeries de Chelsea, il avait photographié ces petits bouts de crânes chevelus que l'on voit en arrivant dans une galerie, le reste du corps étant caché par une barricade design de bureau qui en impose. Andy Freeberg raconte dans l'interview qui suit que, lui-même, se marrait en prenant ces photos !



Andy Freeberg en interview :

Could you please explain the story of the Guardian series ?
In February of 2008, I went to St Petersburg for one week to make some photographs. I had been to Russia in the 1980s and had done a nice series of black and white photos that were taken in the snow in St Petersburg, then called Leningrad. I thought I would try to build on that theme and ultimately do a “before and after” series showing the changes since the breakup of the Soviet Union. When I visited the Hermitage I became fascinated by the sight of the women who sit in the museum rooms and guard the art. Their styles had become more colorful since the 1980s. While I viewed the collections, the women were often directly in my line of sight, and they became a part of the experience of viewing the art itself. I returned a few days later with my camera and began to take photos of them without their knowledge. After a few shots, it dawned on me that they were the “Sentries of the Hermitage”. This could be the follow-up project to my series called “Sentry”, which depicts the large entrance desks to the art galleries in the Chelsea neighborhood in New York City.

How did you notice the guardians ?
I began to look for the women who had some resonance with the art in the room they were sitting in. I enjoyed this visual game, searching for the best combination of guardian and artwork. Shortly after my return to the U.S., I brought eight prints that I had taken over two days at the Hermitage to Fotofest in Houston (a biennial international portfolio review). I showed them along with my Sentry series. I met someone there from the Ministry of Culture in Moscow who said, “You must come back and photograph at the four great museums of Russia”: The Russian State Museum and Hermitage in St Petersburg, and the Pushkin Museum and the State Tretyakov Gallery Museum in Moscow. So I returned in June 2008 and made the rest of the photos for the series that is now on my web site. I am currently in Russia for two weeks to take more Guardian photos that will be published in a book later this year.



For some photographs I have the feeling that the guardians are extracted from paintings, or totally under the influence of the sculptures around them (especially at Pushkin Museum with the 2 sculptures) ? How did you obtain this result ?
I think the most successful images are the ones in which it looks like the women might be related to the work of art. I believe the guards are sometimes subconsciously influenced by the art they are sitting by and, other times, their uncanny similarity is just a coincidence. At the Russian State Museum and the Tretyakov Gallery, both of which house mostly Russian art, the women almost look like relatives of the subjects in the paintings.
In the photos in which the women were aware that I was taking their photos, I gave almost no direction. Through a translator (I don’t speak Russian) or hand gestures, I told them just to pretend I was not there.

What do you want to tell with this series ? Is it a reflexion about the influence of art ?
Art influences life and life influences art.

What is different & what is common between the Sentry series and the Guardians series ?
The commonality between “Sentry” and “Guardians” is that they are taken in public art spaces. The “heads” in Sentry and the women in Guardians represent security, a warning to make sure people don’t get too close or touch the art. They are both the lowest paid workers in the art business. The differences are visually striking: Sentry is subtle shades of white and rectangular shapes. Seeing only the top of the head symbolizes how we don’t look at each other much these days --we are so engrossed in our computers and cell phones and connecting to the rest of the world through them that we don’t even see the person standing right in front of us (with a camera pointed at us). It made me laugh when I took them! With Guardians, the Russian museums are rich in color and texture and full of amazing art. The wall colors were also great to work with. The women are at once beautiful, intriguing, and sometimes sad. When I spoke with some of them, I was surprised when they told me how much they love to be at the museums watching the people, to sit with the art and history of their country. I believe the sad expressions are just the Russian way, a reflection of the difficult life of the last century there.

Do you want to continue to photograph people in art space ?
My favorite part about doing these two series was being among so much great art. It completely inspired and entertained me, so I think I have to do at least one more project with people in art spaces before I move on to other subjects.

Propos recueillis par L.T.


La série Guardians sera exposée à la galerie Blue Skye à Portland du 5 au 29 mars 2009.

Le plan de relance économique d'Obama adopté par le Congrès - Libération, fr - link (aqui)

Barack Obama le 9 février. (REUTERS)


14/02/2009 à 07h42
Les deux chambres du Congrès américain ont adopté un plan de relance économique de 787 milliards de dollars.

Les deux chambres du Congrès américain ont adopté vendredi un plan de relance économique de 787 milliards de dollars, donnant au président Barack Obama une première victoire législative majeure, sans le soutien des républicains.

Le Sénat a approuvé le plan de relance peu avant 23H00 vendredi (04H00 GMT samedi) par 60 voix contre 38, après le vote de la Chambre des représentants par 246 voix contre 183, un peu plus tôt dans l’après-midi.

«Le président Obama a maintenant un projet de loi à signer qui va créer des millions d’emplois bien payés et aider les familles et les entreprises à rester financièrement à flot», a écrit vendredi soir dans un communiqué l’influent sénateur démocrate Max Baucus, l’un des artisans de ce plan de relance.

Au Sénat, la majorité démocrate a bénéficié des voix de trois républicains modérés, ce qui leur a permis de se mettre à l’abri de toute tentative de blocage de la part de l’opposition.

A la chambre basse en revanche, aucun républicain n’a voté pour le plan. Les représentants de l’opposition ont fustigé son coût élevé.

L’adoption du plan par les deux chambres permet au Congrès de transmettre le texte de la nouvelle législation au président Obama pour promulgation. L’objectif des démocrates d’envoyer le projet de loi sur le bureau de M. Obama avant les vacances parlementaires de février a donc été atteint.

Après un peu plus de trois semaines à la Maison Blanche, M. Obama obtient donc son plan de relance destiné à créer ou sauver entre trois et quatre millions d’emplois.

Vendredi, il toutefois prévenu que l’adoption du plan de relance par le Congrès n’était «que le début» de son action pour rétablir la situation économique. Le président américain présentera mercredi prochain, lors d’un déplacement dans l’Arizona (sud-ouest), un plan destiné à enrayer les saisies immobilières, a annoncé vendredi son porte-parole Robert Gibbs.

Tout au long du débat sur le plan de relance, qui a duré environ un mois, les républicains ont réclamé plus d’allègements fiscaux, davantage de mesures de lutte contre la crise du logement et moins de dépenses publiques.

«Ce n’est pas de l’argent du Monopoly, c’est du vrai», a lancé le leader de la minorité républicaine du Sénat Mitch McConnell vendredi peu avant le vote. «Il devra être remboursé par nos enfants», a-t-il ajouté.

Les républicains ont pourtant obtenu de faire passer le coût total du plan sous la barre des 800 milliards de dollars, soit moins que le projet approuvé par la Chambre le 28 janvier (819 milliards) et celui adopté mardi par le Sénat (838 milliards).

Après de longues heures de tractations, le Sénat et la Chambre des représentants, dominés par les démocrates, avaient annoncé mercredi qu’ils s’étaient mis d’accord sur un texte de synthèse.

La présidente de la Chambre des représentants Nancy Pelosi a assuré vendredi que le texte du plan de relance «peut être résumé en un mot: emplois». «De nouveaux emplois pour les 3,6 millions d’Américains qui ont été licenciés depuis le début de la récession», a-t-elle dit.

Mais en attendant, la Bourse de New York a terminé en baisse vendredi soir, le marché se trouvant un peu découragé par le peu d’avancées face à la crise: le Dow Jones a perdu 1,04%.

Le plan est composé, pour plus d’un tiers, d’allègements fiscaux. Le reste est constitué de dépenses sur les infrastructures, la santé, les sciences et technologies, l’éducation ou encore l’énergie propre.

Le plan de relance américain est adopté - Le Figaro, fr - link (aqui)

Crédits photo : AP

Lefigaro.fr (avec AFP)
14/02/2009 | Mise à jour : 09:08

Le Sénat a approuvé le plan de 787 milliards de dollars, par 60 voix contre 38. Le président américain compte le promulguer d'ici à lundi.

Les deux chambres du Congrès américain ont adopté vendredi un plan de relance économique de 787 milliards de dollars, donnant au président Barack Obama une première victoire législative majeure, sans le soutien des républicains. Le Sénat a approuvé le plan de relance peu avant 23 heures vendredi (04 heure GMT samedi) par 60 voix contre 38, après le vote de la Chambre des représentants par 246 voix contre 183, un peu plus tôt dans l'après-midi.

«Le président Obama a maintenant un projet de loi à signer qui va créer des millions d'emplois bien payés et aider les familles et les entreprises à rester financièrement à flot», a écrit vendredi soir l'influent sénateur démocrate Max Baucus, l'un des artisans de ce plan de relance.

Au Sénat, la majorité démocrate a bénéficié des voix de trois républicains modérés, ce qui leur a permis de se mettre à l'abri de toute tentative de blocage de la part de l'opposition. A la chambre basse en revanche, aucun républicain n'a voté pour le plan. Les représentants de l'opposition ont fustigé son coût élevé.

L'adoption du plan par les deux chambres permet au Congrès de transmettre le texte de la nouvelle législation au président Obama pour promulgation. L'objectif des démocrates d'envoyer le projet de loi sur le bureau de Barack Obama avant les vacances parlementaires de février a donc été atteint. Après un peu plus de trois semaines à la Maison Blanche, Barack Obama obtient donc son plan de relance destiné à créer ou sauver entre trois et quatre millions d'emplois.

Vendredi, il toutefois prévenu que l'adoption du plan de relance par le Congrès n'était «que le début» de son action pour rétablir la situation économique. Le président américain présentera mercredi prochain, lors d'un déplacement dans l'Arizona (sud-ouest), un plan destiné à enrayer les saisies immobilières, a annoncé vendredi son porte-parole Robert Gibbs.

«Ce n'est pas l'argent du Monopoly»

Tout au long du débat sur le plan de relance, qui a duré environ un mois, les républicains ont réclamé plus d'allègements fiscaux, davantage de mesures de lutte contre la crise du logement et moins de dépenses publiques. «Ce n'est pas de l'argent du Monopoly, c'est du vrai», a lancé le leader de la minorité républicaine du Sénat Mitch McConnell vendredi peu avant le vote. «Il devra être remboursé par nos enfants», a-t-il ajouté.

Les républicains ont pourtant obtenu de faire passer le coût total du plan sous la barre des 800 milliards de dollars, soit moins que le projet approuvé par la Chambre le 28 janvier (819 milliards) et celui adopté mardi par le Sénat (838 milliards).

Après de longues heures de tractations, le Sénat et la Chambre des représentants, dominés par les démocrates, avaient annoncé mercredi qu'ils s'étaient mis d'accord sur un texte de synthèse.

La présidente de la Chambre des représentants Nancy Pelosi a assuré vendredi que le texte du plan de relance «peut être résumé en un mot: emplois». «De nouveaux emplois pour les 3,6 millions d'Américains qui ont été licenciés depuis le début de la récession», a-t-elle dit.

Le plan est composé, pour plus d'un tiers, d'allègements fiscaux. Le reste est constitué de dépenses sur les infrastructures, la santé, les sciences et technologies, l'éducation ou encore l'énergie propre.

L'ultimatum de l'Élysée aux Caisses d'épargne et aux Banques populaires - Le Figaro, fr - link (aqui)



Bertille Bayart
14/02/2009 | Mise à jour : 09:46

L'exécutif réclame un projet de fusion sous deux semaines. Faute de quoi l'État menace de prendre jusqu'à 30 % du capital et de s'installer aux commandes.

La réunion n'est pas une première, mais elle a permis de mettre fermement les points sur les «i». Jeudi soir, le patron des Caisses d'épargne, Bernard Comolet, et celui des Banques populaires, Philippe Dupont, se sont une fois encore retrouvés dans le bureau de François Pérol, le secrétaire général adjoint de l'Élysée. En présence de représentants de la Banque de France, du Trésor et du cabinet du ministère de l'Économie, les exigences de l'État vis-à-vis du projet de fusion des deux groupes bancaires coopératifs se sont faites plus insistantes.

L'Élysée, qui exige que les négociations avancent vite, a fixé le 26 février comme date limite. Ce jour-là, les deux groupes et leur filiale commune (à 35 % du capital chacun) Natixis présenteront leurs - mauvais - résultats 2008.

Fait nouveau, ce qui était implicite est devenu explicite. Si les deux groupes ne parviennent pas à s'entendre, l'État prendra la main. Pour la première fois, un chiffre a été articulé : une participation publique pouvant aller jusqu'à 30 % du capital du futur groupe est envisagée.

À la différence de ce qui a été fait pour les autres banques françaises, l'investissement de l'État comprendrait des actions classiques, assorties de droit de vote.

Dans le même temps, les pouvoirs publics envisagent d'imposer un management au nouvel ensemble. Le nom de François Villeroy de Galhau, ancien directeur de cabinet de Dominique Strauss-Kahn à Bercy et aujourd'hui membre de la direction de BNP Paribas, circule avec insistance. Mais certains évoquent aussi Charles-Henri Filippi (ex-HS­BC), Philippe Citerne, directeur général délégué de la Société générale, et Stéphane Richard, le directeur de cabinet de Christine Lagarde. De fait, même si les Caisses d'épargne et les Banques populaires bouclent leurs discussions dans le temps imparti, il paraît de moins en moins crédible que Philippe Dupont prenne les rênes du nouveau groupe, comme cela avait été avancé en octobre.

Exaspération grandissante

La pression exercée par les pouvoirs publics témoigne d'une exaspération grandissante devant les difficultés de la négociation engagée depuis octobre entre les deux banques. L'État ne considère l'opération que sous un double aspect : elle donnera naissance à un poids lourd bancaire français, de surcroît non opéable ; et elle est un préalable nécessaire, mais non suffisant, au traitement du cas Natixis, qui n'aura plus qu'un seul actionnaire.

Or, les discussions entre les deux groupes ne cessent de se gripper sur la valorisation de leurs actifs respectifs, parfois même mineurs. L'intégration dans le champ de la fusion de certaines filiales (Nexity, Crédit foncier, Océor côté « rouge », Foncia et ex-Banques HSBC côté « bleu ») cristallise les tensions, vaines aux yeux de l'Élysée. « Ce que nous exigeons, c'est un vrai projet industriel », tempête une source proche. Aux yeux du gouvernement, les problèmes comptables avancés par les uns et les autres sont davantage des prétextes que des obstacles insurmontables.

G7, al via la seconda giornata - La Stampa, it - link (aqui)

Il segretario del tesoro Timothy Geithner con il governatore di bankitalia Mario Draghi


14/2/2009 (7:18)

L'Italia preme: «Standar comuni».
Tremonti: «C'è un deficit di principi»
ROMA
Dopo la cena di gala di ieri sera ed il lavoro febbrile dei "deputies", che fine a notte fonda hanno lavorato a limare i dettagli dei documenti ufficiali, il G7 finanziario entra nel vivo. A partire dalle 8:15 le delegazioni invitate a Roma dalla Presidenza italiana, si riuniscono nella sede del ministero dell’Economia in via Venti Settembre.

Piani anti-crisi, regole di armonizzazione, standard legali, misure contro il rinascente protezionismo, riforma delle istituzioni finanziarie internazionali: molti i temi forti all’ordine del giorno, resi ancor più pressanti dall’incalzare della crisi internazionale che sta falciando nel mondo prospettive di crescita, posti di lavoro e redditi. L’Italia, riferiscono le fonti del G7, preme perchè si arrivi quanto prima ad una definizione di standard comuni, sia in ambito dei mercati finanziari, sia delle politiche fiscali, sia del commercio internazionale, coinvolgendo per questo i diversi bracci operativi rappresentati dagli organismi internazionali, dal Fsf, per quanto riguarda vigilanza e requisiti patrimoniali delle banche, al Wto, all’Ocse.

Le proposte sul campo sono diverse. Il Financial Times ha anticipato che la Francia, ad esempio, chiederà ai partner regole più stringenti per gli hedge funds, più trasparenza in borsa e maggiori controlli sui fondi di investimento speculativi. Gli Stati Uniti e la Gran Bretagna, invece, non gradirebbero nuovi vincoli agli strumenti finanziari più evoluti e quindi, con ogni probabilità, si dichiareranno contrari. L’Italia, dal canto suo, ha lanciato la proposta dei "legal standard": secondo il Ministro dell’Economia Giulio Tremonti, ora più che mai è necessario adottare un insieme di regole sulla proprietà delle attività internazionali e sulla trasparenza, assieme anche ad un rafforzamento della cooperazione fra le autorità di vigilanza e di regolamentazione dei mercati. Proposta che potrebbe fare da base ad un documento più articolato da poi presentare al G20 di Londra, in aprile.

L’ultimo richiamo contro il protezionismo è di giovedì scorso da parte della Bce e sul tema sono ritornati oggi il Fmi e la Banca Mondiale che hanno messo in guardia dal pericolo di danneggiare i più poveri. Va da sè che la necessità di arginare qualsiasi desiderio di «alzare le barriere» è un altro degli argomenti più importanti in agenda. Tant’è vero che secondo una bozza del documento finale del G7 (che verrà diramato ufficialmente domani), c’è scritto nero su bianco l’impegno dei Grandi «ad evitare misure protezioniste». Bisogna piuttosto agire «tutti assieme» per favorire la ripresa. Il segretario al Tesoro Usa Timothy Geithner ha avuto, proprio su questo tema, un incontro con il suo omologo giapponese Shoichi Nakagawa che gli ha espresso preoccupazione per la clausola "Buy american". Geithner - al suo debutto internazionale - coglierà l’occasione per illustrare a grandi linee il pacchetto di stimoli all’economia proposto dall’amministrazione Obama e che riceverà ha ricevuto il via libera dal Congresso Usa.

Vertice G7 a Roma: l'Italia punta a regole comuni - Il Messaggero, it - link (aqui)

ROMA (14 febbraio) - I lavori del G7 sono iniziati questa mattina intorno alle 8 dopo l'incontro informale di ieri sera con la cena di gala che ha iniziato a discutere delle linee guida presentate dalla presidenza italiana. La discussione di standard legali, ovvero di regole comuni, e un nuovo monito contro il protezionismo proseguirà oggi in attesa del comunicato finale del vertice che sarà diffuso al termine dei lavori, previsto per il primo pomeriggio.

No al protezionismo Dalla bozza preparatoria i principali temi trattati sembrano prevedere: ulteriori azioni per ristabilire fiducia nei mercati, favorire crescita e occupazione, no al protezionismo, regolamentazione degli hudge funds, evitare la volatilità dei cambi, rafforzare il ruolo del Fmi. Le raccomandazioni che arriveranno alla fine del vertice dai Sette Grandi saranno illustrate dalla presidenza italiana.

Italia: standard comuni L'Italia, riferiscono le fonti del G7, preme perchè si arrivi quanto prima a questa definizione di standard comuni, sia in ambito dei mercati finanziari, sia delle politiche fiscali, sia del commercio internazionale, coinvolgendo per questo i diversi bracci operativi rappresentati dagli organismi internazionali, dal Fsf, per quanto riguarda vigilanza e requisiti patrimoniali delle banche, al Wto, all'Ocse. Anche per questo i numeri uno di queste agenzie internazionali, insieme con i rappresentanti di Fmi, banca Mondiale, Unctad, sono stati invitati alla cena di ieri sera e saranno consultati durante i lavori di oggi. I ministri finanziari si occuperanno inevitabilmente dei piani anticrisi annunciati finora, anche allo scopo di evitare asimmetrie tra un paese e l'altro. Cercheranno di coordinare i piani di stimolo all'economia reale dopo che la crisi finanziaria ha impattato direttamente sui pil dei Sette.

Asset tossici delle banche Discussione aperta anche su come gestire gli asset tossici delle banche. Se da un lato una crisi così è rara e con pochi precedenti di queste dimensioni, anche la risposta degli Stati, tengono a sottolineare i componenti del G7, riferiscono le stesse fonti, e il tentativo di coordinamento ricercato, sono stati senza precedenti. L'eccezionalità del momento, viene sottolineato, non deve far perdere di vista tuttavia la necessità di avere conti in ordine nel medio termine e che l'economia mondiale deve ispirarsi al libero scambio.

Aiuti di Stato Gli aiuti di Stato rappresentano un vulnus nella concorrenza che solo in presenza di una situazione così drammatica possono essere giustificati per risolvere problemi di rottura momentanea del mercato. Questo appunto non deve aprire la porta al protezionismo. Così come non si può trascurare l'effetto devastante che la crisi può avere per la sicurezza alimentare. Proprio per questo ai lavori del vertice è stato invitato il presidente dell'Ifad, Lennart Bage mentre il presidente della Banca Mondiale ha lanciato l'allarme povertà per milioni di persone a rischio sugli effetti della crisi globale.

Usa, il piano Obama passa anche al Senato - Corriere Della Sera, it - link (aqui)


Il pacchetto da 787 miliardi ottiene 60 sì (compresi quelli di tre repubblicani): soglia per superare lo sbarramento


WASHINGTON - Poche ore dopo il voto favorevole della Camera dei Rappresentanti, è arrivato anche il sì del Senato: il Congresso statunitense ha approvato il piano di stimolo all’economia da 787 miliardi di dollari presentato dal presidente Barack Obama. Il provvedimento è passato al Senato con 60 voti a favore (compresi quelli di tre senatori repubblicani) e 38 contrari; la Camera aveva approvato con 246 voti a favore e 183 contrari (tra cui tutti i deputati repubblicani): il via libera, pur se rivelatosi meno bipartisan del previsto, rappresenta comunque una grande vittoria per Obama che potrebbe firmarlo già la prossima settimana, meno di un mese dopo essersi insediato alla Casa Bianca.

TRE REPUBBLICANI MODERATI - Le operazioni di voto erano iniziate alle 23.30 di venerdì ora italiana ma sono proseguite ben oltre l’ora prevista per attendere il senatore democratico dell’Ohio Sherrod Brown, che era andato al funerale della madre. In Senato la soglia per superare lo sbarramento dell’opposizione era infatti di 60 voti, una maggioranza "blindata" che i democratici non hanno ma a cui sono arrivati grazie all’aiuto di tre repubblicani moderati: il senatore della Pennsylvania Arlen Specter e le senatrici del Maine Susan Collins e Olympia Snowe. Il piano, un documento di 1.071 pagine, prevede circa 281 miliardi di dollari in tagli fiscali per i singoli individui e per le imprese e oltre 500 miliardi di dollari in spese federali, che saranno destinate a infrastrutture, sanità e programmi statali e che dovrebbe contribuire a creare o salvare 3 milioni e mezzo di posti di lavoro. Il pacchetto contiene inoltre anche delle controverse misure protezionistiche nei settori dell’acciaio, del ferro e dei prodotti manifatturieri, la cui effettiva applicazione rimarrebbe tuttavia a discrezione dell’amministrazione: a spingere per l’inclusione sono stati i sindacati con l’obiettivo di stimolare la creazione di nuovi posti di lavoro, ma le aziende temono che se effettivamente messe in atto provochino rappresaglie commerciali contro gli Stati Uniti.

(Apcom)
14 febbraio 2009

Aznavour será embajador de Armenia en Ginebra - El País, es - link (aqui)

Charles Aznavour

R. CARRIZO COUTO - Ginebra - 14/02/2009

El mítico cantante francés de origen armenio Charles Aznavour, de 84 años, aceptó el jueves pasado el nombramiento de embajador de Armenia en Ginebra. El anuncio se hizo en la televisión de Ereván. "Es un gran honor que me hace Armenia al proponerme ser su embajador en Suiza. Primero tuve mis dudas, pero luego pensé que lo que es importante para Armenia debe ser importante para todos. Por tanto, he decidido aceptar la propuesta con placer y alegría". El puesto no será remunerado.

Tigran Balayán, portavoz del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores, explicó a este periódico que "el nombramiento de Aznavour no tiene aún carácter oficial", aunque hace días el presidente de Armenia, Serguéi Sarkissian, le propuso al cantante ocupar el puesto vacante de representante de Armenia en Ginebra, ciudad en la que Aznavour mantiene residencia desde hace más de 30 años. El compromiso de Charles Aznavour con su país de origen no es nuevo. De hecho, el verdadero apellido del intérprete de temas legendarios como La Bohemia o Venecia sin ti es Aznavourian.

El cantante ha mantenido relaciones con todos los presidentes del país y en 2004 fue nombrado Héroe Nacional por el presidente Robert Kocharian.

Así fue... en las artes y en las calles - El País, link (aqui)

Así fue... en las artes y en las calles- FERNANDO VICENTE

José Enrique Ruiz-Doménec viaja por la historia de España a través de sus hitos culturales y cotidianos - La Hispania romana y la Guerra Civil acotan la obra

MIGUEL ÁNGEL VILLENA - Madrid - 14/02/2009

"La historia del matrimonio de Alfonso XII con su prima María de las Mercedes, hija de los condes de Montpensier, se hizo para ser recitada en las plazas públicas, como la de su tataranieto Felipe de Borbón con Letizia Ortiz se hizo para las cámaras de televisión". Con este párrafo, el historiador José Enrique Ruiz-Doménec ilustra el papel que la Monarquía jugó para asentar la Restauración, un sistema político que se prolongó en España durante más de medio siglo (1876-1931).

La relevancia concedida a los movimientos culturales y a la vida cotidiana, junto a una cuidada elección de anécdotas históricas que llegan a elevarse a categorías, como en la famosa boda de Alfonso XII que ha llegado al imaginario popular e incluso al cine, figuran entre los ejes de España, una nueva historia (Gredos). El libro, que aparecerá la semana próxima, responde al intento de Ruiz-Doménec, historiador formado en Francia y en el Reino Unido, de ofrecer una obra de síntesis, divulgativa y rigurosa al mismo tiempo.

"Analizar los factores humanos", señala el catedrático de la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, "y cómo inciden en los grandes hechos históricos ha sido mi objetivo. Hay que tener en cuenta que detrás de cada decisión con trascendencia se halla el factor humano. Cuando hablo de nueva historia, de un enfoque distinto para abordar la evolución de España, quiero decir que estoy mezclando el microrrelato con el macrorrelato, subrayando siempre la importancia de las mentalidades, de la vida cotidiana y de la cultura. De este modo, utilizo mucho las obras de artistas como Cervantes, Quevedo, Farinelli, Larra, Sorolla, Falla o Pardo Bazán para ayudar a entender las distintas épocas de España, más allá de los sucesos políticos o los avatares económicos".

Para conseguir esos objetivos resulta necesario que el historiador escriba como un novelista o, incluso mejor, como un periodista. "Mi maestro Georges Duby me impuso como deberes que aprendiera a escribir bien, con ritmo y estilo. Es básico para una buena narración histórica saber contar los acontecimientos para que los comprenda cualquier lector de periódicos y no sólo los eruditos. De hecho, yo escribo historia por responsabilidad ciudadana".

Persuadido de que Internet ha acabado con la necesidad de notas a pie de página y con las bibliografías infinitas, Ruiz-Doménec no tiene dudas de que el éxito que vive el género histórico en España, desde la novela al ensayo pasando por las biografías, obedece a las carencias del sistema educativo.

El autor defiende un salto interpretativo y argumenta que muchas fechas históricas han afectado más a la memoria colectiva que a la realidad diaria de los que la vivieron. Y a la hora de analizar, el catedrático de Historia Medieval, aunque con vocación de generalista, resalta las dos o las múltiples Españas que convivieron en algunas etapas de la Edad Media.

Musulmanes y cristianos Califatos y territorio

A pesar de tópicos y de lugares comunes, hasta la llegada del siglo XX ninguna otra centuria ha marcado tanto la organización territorial y política de la península Ibérica como la que comienza en el año 1000. "Los motivos últimos", señala el autor en su libro, "debemos encontrarlos en el hundimiento del califato musulmán de Córdoba, con la fragmentación en reinos de taifas, y en la formación de una moral de conquista entre los cristianos".

Conquista de América Matar para ser alguien

Mucho se ha escrito sobre las motivaciones de los españoles que acudieron al descubrimiento y la conquista de América en el siglo XVI. España, una nueva historia ofrece una interpretación que apela a lo material, pero también a la psicología social de la época. "La historia de la conquista de México enseña hasta qué punto la idea de sacrificarse por la monarquía universal afectó a los conquistadores. Su enloquecido proceder en las décadas siguientes muestra una verdad más concreta y más oscura, que reposa en los motivos esgrimidos para salir de casa en busca de aventuras en aquellas lejanas tierras: el hallazgo de El Dorado. Y de esta superchería bien tramada en el imaginario colectivo de los españoles del siglo XVI llegamos a otra más profunda, más terrible, porque en ella repercute el gesto atávico de los siglos, el incesante zumbido devorador de unos hombres que matan para ser alguien en la vida; en el horizonte ya pueden aparecer Lope de Aguirre y los demás".

Guerra de Sucesión Mito y realidad catalana

El ensayo de Ruiz-Doménec trata algunas fechas históricas desde la influencia que tuvieron entre sus contemporáneos y desde la proyección hacia el futuro en forma de mitos. Con esta actitud aborda momentos como 1492 o 1808. Tras explicar que la Revolución Francesa se dejó sentir mucho más a partir de los años del terror en 1793 que inmediatamente después de la toma de la Bastilla en 1789 -un acontecimiento que representó más un símbolo para las generaciones siguientes que un suceso que cambiara la vida de aquellos que lo presenciaron-, el historiador dedica especial atención a la guerra de Sucesión de 1714. Una guerra que supuso el paso de los Austrias a los Borbones y de una España descentralizada a un país mucho más unitario. "Sólo para nosotros", cuenta en su libro, "que estamos al corriente de lo que ocurrió en los dos siglos y medio siguientes, ése fue el fin del autogobierno catalán. Para el viajero que franqueaba las viejas murallas medievales, Barcelona aparecía en su innegable esplendor".

Los afrancesados El drama de Moratín

Como hace en numerosas ocasiones a lo largo de España, una nueva historia, Ruiz-Doménec usa un personaje del mundo de la cultura para describir las contradicciones de un periodo.

Pocos intelectuales han vivido más el desgarro y la pugna entre el cerebro y el corazón que los ilustrados afrancesados, partidarios de la libertad, la igualdad y la fraternidad y que apoyaron la ocupación de Napoleón. "Para mí", afirma Ruiz-Doménec, "el caso más trágico de aquel éxtasis a la vez popular y patriótico fue el del dramaturgo Leandro Fernández de Moratín. (...) Sólo vio una salida: recogerse en sí mismo y callar mientras los demás tomaban posiciones.

Salones y cafés Entre literatura y política

Como un termómetro muy revelador de la intención de este enfoque de la historia de España y como pauta del estilo de este libro, que abarca desde la época romana hasta la Guerra Civil, el historiador analiza el paso de los salones literarios a los cafés a finales del XIX y comienzos del XX.

Ruiz-Doménec recurre a Emilia Pardo Bazán y su obra La quimera. "Los cafés representaban para muchos escritores y artistas españoles sin recursos un refugio contra los rigores de la existencia cotidiana. En ellos se forjó la ilusión de una vida más brillante, más libre, parecida a la vida mundana de París o de Viena, cuyos modelos se imitaban de forma descarada; en ellos se desarrolló un cambio de estética radical que sustituye la matriz romántica por el realismo y el naturalismo".

España, una nueva historia se queda en 1939, pero su autor ya prepara la segunda parte.

Junto a Hobsbawn

- José Enrique Ruiz-Doménec. Nacido en Granada en 1948, es catedrático de Historia Medieval de la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona desde hace años y esa doble condición de andaluz residente en Cataluña ha marcado buena parte de su visión amplia y poco dogmática de España. Autor de obras como El despertar de las mujeres, El Gran Capitán o El Mediterráneo, Ruiz-Doménec es el representante español en una comisión de historiadores de los 27 países de la UE, que preside Eric Hobsbawn, y es miembro del prestigioso FestivalStoria, de Turín.