domingo, 1 de março de 2009

Fabiana Cozza canta "Xangô te xinga"

Bruna Caram - "Essa Menina"

Mallu Magalhães canta "Vanguart"

Aline Calixto - "Oxossi"

"Lábios de Cetim", por Glaucia Nasser

"FICO ASSIM SEM VOCÊ" - ADRIANA CALCANHOTO

Fico assim sem você

vião sem asa,
fogueira sem brasa,
sou eu assim sem você.
Futebol sem bola,
Piu-piu sem Frajola,
sou eu assim sem você.

Por que é que tem que ser assim
se o meu desejo não tem fim.
Eu te quero a todo instante nem mil auto falantes
vão poder falar por mim.

Amor sem beijinho,
Bochecha sem claudinho,
sou eu assim sem você.
Circo sem palhaço,
namoro sem amasso,
sou eu assim sem você

Tô louca pra te ver chegar,
Tô louca pra te ter nas mãos.
Deitar no teu abraço,
Retomar o pedaço que falta no meu coração.

Eu não existo longe de você
e a solidão é o meu pior castigo.
Eu conto as horas pra poder te ver
mas o relógio tá de mal comigo
Por quê?
Por quê?

Neném sem chupeta,
Romeu sem Julieta,
sou eu assim sem você.
Carro sem estrada,
queijo sem goiabada,
sou eu assim sem você

Por que é que tem que ser assim
se o meu desejo não tem fim.
Eu te quero a todo instante nem mil auto falantes vão poder
falar por mim

Eu não existo longe de você
e a solidão é o meu pior castigo.
Eu conto as horas pra poder te ver
mas o relógio tá de mal comigo.

Gal e Elis - "Amor até o fim"

rita lee "menino menino menino"

Anna Luisa - "Tente Outra Vez" (Raul Seixas) GLOBO

Roberta Sá - "Belo estranho dia de amanhã"

CéU: "Lenda"

20 anos Blues - Elis Regina

20 Anos Blues

Composição: Vitor Martins e Sueli Costa

Ontem de manhã quando acordei
Olhei a vida e me espantei
Eu tenho mais de 20 anos

E eu tenho mais de mil perguntas sem respostas
Estou ligada num futuro blue

Os meus pais nas minhas costas
As raizes na marquise
Eu tenho mais de vinte muros
O sangue jorra pelos furos pelas veias de um jornal
Eu não te quero
Eu te quero mal

Essa calma que inventei, bem sei
Custou as contas que contei
Eu tenho mais de 20 anos

E eu quero as cores e os colirios
Meus delirios
Estou ligada num futuro blue

Os meus pais nas minhas costas
As raizes na marquise
Eu tenho mais de vinte muros
O sangue jorra pelos furos pelas veias de um jornal
Eu não te quero
Eu te quero mal

Ontem de manhã quando acordei
Olhei a vida e me espantei
Eu tenho mais de 20 anos

Bar é prosa - Fernando Sabino


Fernando Sabino





UM POUCO DISTRAÍDO

(Fernando Sabino)



ANDO um pouco distraído, ultimamente. Alguns amigos mais velhos sorriem, complacentes, e dizem que é isso mesmo, costuma acontecer com a idade, não é distração: é memória fraca mesmo, insuficiência de fosfato.

O diabo é que me lembro cada vez mais de coisas que deveria esquecer: dados inúteis, nomes sem significado, frases idiotas, circunstâncias ridículas, detalhes sem importância. Em compensação, troco o nome das pessoas, confundo fisionomias, ignoro conhecidos, cumprimento desafetos. Nunca sei onde largo objetos de uso e cada saída minha de casa representa meia hora de atraso em aflitiva procura: quede minhas chaves? meus cigarros? meu isqueiro? minha caneta?

Estou convencido de que tais objetos, embora inanimados, têm um pacto secreto com o demônio, para me atormentar: eles se escondem.

Recentemente descobri a maneira infalível de derrotá-los. Ainda há pouco quis acender um cigarro, dei por falta do isqueiro. Em vez de procurá-lo freneticamente, como já fiz tantas vezes, abrindo e fechando gavetas, revirando a casa feito doido, para acabar plantado no meio da sala apalpando os bolsos vazios como um tarado, levantei-me com naturalidade sem olhar para lugar nenhum e fui olimpicamente à cozinha apanhar uma caixa de fósforos.

Ao voltar — eu sabia! — dei com o bichinho ali mesmo, na ponta da mesa, bem diante do meu nariz, a olhar-me desapontado. Tenho a certeza de que ele saiu de seu esconderijo para me espiar.

Até agora estou vencendo: quando eles se escondem, saio de casa sem chaves e bato na porta ao voltar; compro outro maço de cigarros na esquina, uma nova caneta, mais um par de óculos escuros; e não telefono para ninguém até que minha caderneta resolva aparecer. É uma guerra sem tréguas, mas hei de sair vitorioso.

Daí para me considerar um distraído, vai um grande passo. Esse passo quase dei outro dia, ao abrir a porta do quarto e ganhar calmamente o corredor. A empregada me olhava espavorida, mas logo pude considerar justificável a sua estranha reação, dado que me esquecera de vestir as calças.

Alarmado, confidenciei a um amigo este e outros pequenos lapsos que me têm ocorrido, mas ele me consolou de pronto, contando as distrações de um tio seu, perto do qual não passo de mero principiante.

Trata-se de um desses que põem o guarda-chuva na cama e se dependuram no cabide, como manda a anedota. Já saiu à rua com o chapéu da esposa na cabeça. Já cumprimentou o trocador do ônibus quando este lhe estendeu a mão para cobrar a passagem. Já deu parabéns à viúva na hora do velório do marido. Certa noite, recebendo em sua casa uma visita de cerimônia, despertou de um rápido cochilo e se ergueu logo, dizendo para sua mulher: “Vamos, meu bem, que já está ficando tarde.” O contrário se deu quando, recentemente, errou de porta e entrou em casa alheia, estirou-se na poltrona, abriu o jornal e tirou os sapatos, estranhando a empregada que o olhava estupefata: “Empregada nova, hein? Avise à patroa que já cheguei. E traga meus chinelos.”

Contou-me ainda o sobrinho do monstro que sair com um sapato diferente em cada pé, tomar ônibus errado, esquecer dinheiro em casa, são coisas que ele faz quase todos os dias. A mulher fica aflita, temendo que um dia ele esqueça definitivamente o caminho de casa. Perde, em média, um par de óculos por semana e nunca trouxe de volta o mesmo guarda-chuva com que saiu. Já lhe aconteceu tanto se esquecer de almoçar como almoçar duas vezes. Outro dia arranjou para o sobrinho um emprego num escritório de advocacia, para que fosse praticando, enquanto estudante.

— Você sabe — me conta o sobrinho: — O que eu estudo é medicina...

Não, eu não sabia: para dizer a verdade, só agora o estava identificando. Mas não passei recibo — faz parte de minha nova estratégia, para não acabar como o tio dele: dar o dito por não dito, não falar mais no assunto, acender um cigarro. É o que farei agora. Isto é, se achar o cigarro.

Comercial antigo - Q-Suco

Charge do dia


Clayton - Jornal O Povo - Fortaleza, CE

Ferrari 430 Scuderia - The Times, uk - link (aqui)

March 1, 2009

Some readers may remember an encounter I had with Jeremy Clarkson during an episode of Top Gear. He was in a lift with me at the BBC and was sitting in a very small car. Before we started filming, he said: “All you have to do is stand there and ignore me”, which is quite hard when you’re standing next to a grown man in a tiny car in a lift.



And then he started muttering to himself. “The last time I was in a lift with Fiona Bruce she put chewing gum in my hair,” he said. This is absolutely not true.

After I helped him out in his car, he said: “She does have quite a nice bottom.” Out loud, to the camera. I suppose it’s better than saying it was a horrible one, but it was pretty embarrassing even so.

I got my own back when I appeared on Top Gear as the “star in a reasonably priced car” and mentioned in passing that his bottom could do with a bit of work. I don’t think he really cared but now I think I’ve managed to do something that will really get to him: perch my bottom — nice or otherwise — on his patch.

I know what he would say: “Bruce is currently third from last in the ‘star in a reasonably priced car’ league table, and even then she managed to burn out the clutch halfway around one of the laps and had to walk the rest of the circuit.” So how can I be qualified to test any car, let alone a Ferrari 430 Scuderia, which costs more than many people’s houses, is billed as a race-bred beast best suited for a day at the track and has an engine so loud that when I first switched it on I jumped out of my skin and my children started to cry?

Well, let me put it this way. I have to walk through the Top Gear office at the BBC quite often to get to one of the editing suites. And the atmosphere is pretty laddish, as you might expect, a bit sexist and not entirely grown up. It’s a fair reflection of the show, but is it actually any good if you want to know a bit more about a car? The Scuderia may have Jeremy leaping about shouting “Power!”, but what is it like to live with in the real world?

First an admission: my car is a Citroën C4 Picasso. This has seven seats, with DVD screens in the rear seats for the kids, and is incredibly comfortable to drive. I love it. It’s a car you get in and you don’t even have to think. The headlights come on automatically, it has windscreen wipers that sense when it’s raining, and automatic air-conditioning. That’s the sort of car I like and I am deeply attached to it. It is a total living room on wheels.

The Ferrari is not like this. According to my 11-year-old son Sam (who is a Top Gear fan and immediately Googled it), the Scuderia is based on the standard Ferrari F430 — only it is faster.

He told me the 4.3-litre V8 engine produces an “incredible” 510bhp and 347 lb ft of torque, whatever that is; that it features new pistons and hand-polished intake manifolds, plus an exhaust system that “breathes” more freely. It also has Ferrari’s fastest gearbox, which can swap ratios in 60 milliseconds, and it can sprint from 0-62mph in 3.6sec with a top speed of 198mph. It costs £168,9621, or about £148,000 more than my Citroën.

When it arrived at my north London home, the first problem was getting it onto my driveway. The front of the car is so low that the slight slope of the drive meant there was no way I could manoeuvre the Ferrari up there without scraping the underside.

The man from Ferrari and I spent half an hour discussing this, and then discovered that if you reversed it up the drive at a specific angle and only a hair’s breadth from the wall you could get it in with only a couple of horrible-sounding scrapes.

Our neighbours watched this manoeuvre with their hands over their faces. Before he left, the Ferrari man eyed me warily and said that although most things were covered by the insurance, if I kerbed the wheels I would have to pay for them.

What’s it like to drive? My daughter Mia, 7, had been particularly well behaved, so as a reward I said I would take her for a first drive and suggested we go for a blast up the M1. She didn’t want to go up the M1. She wanted to go to Sainsbury’s. “No, come on, darling,” I said, “let’s go for a fast drive on the motorway”, and she burst into tears. We went to Sainsbury’s.

So we got to the supermarket and put the chicken and the vegetables and biscuits under the bonnet.

Then I couldn’t get out of the car park because the Ferrari is so low that reaching the ticket machine was all but impossible. A queue of irate drivers formed and it seemed that if you can’t drive in a Ferrari everyone hates you that little bit more than if you were in a normal car.

When we got home — after crawling over hundreds of speed bumps at 1mph — I couldn’t open the bonnet to get the shopping out so had to get my husband to help me. I’m afraid the supercar failed the shopping challenge.

What about the commute? I took it to the location where I was filming last week and thought: “I’m going to work — let’s put the radio on.” It’s a pretty basic radio anyway but you wouldn’t know from listening to it because you can’t hear it above the roar of the engine. In fact everything about the interior is pretty basic.

It has few home comforts. There is no carpet on the floor, so you have to wear driving shoes because high heels scrape the metal. The aluminium is all on show and you can see the joins — they look like the edges of a cornish pasty where the two sides have been squished together.

There’s a heater dial, and that’s about it, apart from a button with LC on it, which I think stands for launch control. I was slightly too frightened to press it in case my underwear burst into flames.

The suspension is rock hard. Even when I pressed the button that made the suspension softer I still felt every bump and groove in the road. And, God, it’s hard to get in and out of. Even if you try to do a Lucy Clayton and swing your legs out, it’s impossible. Open the door and you will virtually fall out of it then try to scrabble upright — not an elegant look.

Even I know this car isn’t meant for commuting or shopping. It is the sort of car you would have if you had other cars and you wanted one to play with or go round a track in. I didn’t take it on a track but I did eventually get it onto the motorway with Sam. And here an interesting thing happened. All of a sudden the car made me a different person.

Driving at speed in this Ferrari makes you feel as though you are driving like a god; as if there is nobody else on the road driving quite as brilliantly and in quite as much control as you. It drives as if it is on rails and you want to go incredibly fast. You are fighting that temptation all the time. It brings out that driver in me that I didn’t know I had. Sam thought it was absolutely brilliant.

People’s reactions change too. They may have been irate in the supermarket car park — thinking, “Who’s that in that flash gas-guzzler, trying to get her ticket in the machine?” — but on the open road they looked like they were admiring an amazing piece of engineering. They let you in because they are so in love with it.

I don’t know whether this is because of the legend of Ferrari — that deep-seated knowledge, even among non-car people, that a Ferrari is a thoroughbred with a history all of its own — or because of the minute attention to detail on every aspect of the car: even the metallic blue paint is an exact replica of an original shade from the 1960s.

It is certainly a man magnet too: men were looking at the car all the time. I think they were eyeing up the car more than me, but they definitely wanted to have a look. It means you need to make sure you have your mascara and lippy on every time you get in it.

Oh, no. I can hear Jeremy now: “Bruce loves the Ferrari Scuderia because it makes her want to wear lipstick.”

Maybe. But a driver is only as fast as the car they are in. And I reckon that behind the wheel of this Ferrari Scuderia I could be a match for him. If he thinks otherwise, he knows where to find me.

The Bruceometer

ENGINE 4308cc, eight cylinders
POWER 510bhp @ 8500rpm
TORQUE 347 lb ft @ 5250rpm
TRANSMISSION Six-speed automatic
FUEL 15.7mpg (combined)
CO2 360g/km
ACCELERATION 0-62mph: 3.6sec
TOP SPEED 198mph
PRICE £168,962
ROAD TAX BAND G (£400 a year)
RELEASE DATE On sale

A real man magnet

The man who has lost £3bn in the recession admits: 'I did some dumb things in 2008' - The Guardian, uk - link (aqui)


Warren Buffett, one of America's richest men, has lost £3bn in the recession, it emerged last night.

Buffett, who started his working life selling fizzy drinks door-to-door, is nicknamed the Sage of Omaha for his legendary financial acumen, but even he cannot escape the carnage.

His investment company Berkshire Hathaway yesterday reported that profits fell 62% last year, reducing its value by £8bn and making it the worst year for Buffett since he took control 44 years ago.

Buffett's losses flow from his 40% stake in Berkshire, which invests in property and insurance companies, but also has holdings in household names such as Coca Cola, American Express and the Washington Post

In his annual letter to shareholders Buffett says investors finished 2008 "bloodied and confused" because of the dysfunctional credit market and other financial turmoil. Berkshire was particularly damaged by losses from derivatives, investments tied to the stock market, which Buffett once described as "weapons of mass financial destruction".

He says the recent credit boom made many people adopt a creed he used to see on restaurant walls years ago. It read: "In God we trust, all others pay cash." Now, Buffett is certain that "the nation's economy will be in a shambles throughout 2009, and for that matter, probably well beyond".

But he is not entirely gloomy: America has faced bigger challenges in the past, including two world wars and the Great Depression. "America's best days lie ahead," he said.

Buffett, a close friend of the Microsoft founder Bill Gates, has seen his shares in Berkshire halve in value since the summer of 2007. In his letter to investors, he admits that "in 2008, I did some dumb things". The dumbest was buying a large holding in energy company Conoco Phillips when oil prices were near their peak. "In no way did I anticipate the dramatic drop in prices that occurred."

Buffett says he also spent $244m on stock in two Irish banks that appeared cheap. But since then, he has written down the value of those purchases to $27m.

He has described the credit crunch as akin to "an economic Pearl Harbor" and has predicted that the recession will be "long and deep".

Buffett, a congenial 78, is still worth tens of billions of dollars, but shareholders in Berkshire worry about who will take over. "He is irreplaceable," says one.

These bankers are lucky that they are not going to jail - The Guardian, uk - link (aqui)



The government has been too timid about confronting these failed financiers. It's time that it showed some teeth



Andrew Rawnsley
The Observer, Sunday 1 March 2009

Assuming it is out of the question to hang, draw and quarter Sir Fred Goodwin, pluck out his intestines while they are still warm and wriggling, stuff them into his greedy mouth and then display his severed head on a spike at the Tower of London, could we settle for shooting him instead? Yes, I know, I'm going soft.

Not as soft, mind you, as the politicians who merely condemn him. Gordon Brown calls it "unjustifiable and unacceptable" that the man who led RBS to ruin should refuse to give up a pension worth in excess of £650,000 a year. Peter Mandelson today escalates the government's outrage. In my interview with the business secretary for the Observer, he calls Sir Fred "obscene". Trouble is that I doubt being told that he is an obscenity, even when the name-caller is such a grandee as Lord Mandelson, will cause Fred the Shred to lose much sleep. If Sir Fred had a pound for every time he has been called something rude, he'd be ... well, he'd be as ludicrously rich as he already is.

Politicians can use whatever adjectives they like to deplore this banker and his wretched ilk for demanding gargantuan rewards for abject failures. The issue is, what is to be done about it? Bankers are hated by the voters, universally pilloried in the media and their excesses have been condemned by every political party from the SWP to the BNP and all points between. And yet still they don't give a damn.

Exhortation and condemnation is wasted breath unless it is accompanied by action. Even though the bankers are now supplicants to the taxpayer, the government is still showing them far too much reverence. Having been in thrall to the erstwhile masters of the universe for a generation, the political class has still not entirely shed its deference to the fallen money changers. Some of the dilemmas faced by ministers when grappling with these characters are real and tricky. They worry that attacking the bankers too viciously will further undermine confidence in the financial system. They fret over the extent to which politicians and civil servants are equipped to interfere in the detailed running of these failed institutions. Even though the banking system is now effectively nationalised, Gordon Brown wants to keep his distance from managing it. That leaves the government with responsibility while still being highly hesitant about exercising control.

One minister who is grappling with the toxic issue of Fred the Shred and his pension groans that it is "a legal nightmare". They say the same about the bankers' enthusiasm for continuing to pay themselves whopping bonuses. Ministers mutter that contractual obligations make it all very difficult. Yet it should not be beyond the capacity of the politicians to cut through the legal thicket. This is one of the advantages of being the government: if the law is a ass, you can change it. Had RBS been any other sort of business, it would now be bust. But for the billions poured in by the taxpayer, this bank would be kaput. There would be no pension honey pot for Sir Fred to stick his paw in. If the law is the problem with stopping him, then the law can be changed.

The voters have seen things more clearly. Their fury with the feckless financiers has cut through the complexities that fog the minds of ministers. The bankers behaved with an arrogant recklessness which broke their own businesses and devastated large sections of the economy. Now they are getting bailed out with everyone else's money. Bankers should be grateful if they still have a job and relieved that they have not been lynched. They should not be slurping up enormous bonuses and vast pensions. End of story.

The politicians have lacked the clarity of that anger. Even after the bankers had wrecked the financial system, ministers were hesitant about putting them in their place. When they launched the first bail-out last autumn, the Treasury and Number 10 appear to have been astonishingly innocent in assuming that the bankers would quickly own up to the full extent of their mistakes. The epic scale of the horrors has only become apparent to ministers as the government has slowly drilled into the bankers' books.

A similar naivety has characterised their approach to bankers' remuneration. Ministers were taken by surprise by the determination of bailed-out banks to carry on paying lavish bonuses and golden pension parachutes to failed executives. It is not denied that the City minister Paul Myners knew about the eye-popping size of Sir Fred's pension. Yet he did not demand that it be reduced or suggest steps to confiscate it altogether. Lord Myners did not argue that Sir Fred ought to be given the sack rather than the cushy option of early retirement. If the government raised no objection, it was because politicians didn't think they had the power to do so. Even in a case of such manifest and colossal failure, ministers were still programmed to take the softly-softly approach when dealing with bankers. Lord Myners eventually suggested to Sir Fred that the banker should voluntarily give up part - only part, mind you - of his absurd pension. The City minister seems to have thought that the threat of unpleasant publicity might be a sufficient inducement for Sir Fred to do the decent thing and hand back some of the cash. That was to misread his character. If Sir Fred was bothered about what everyone thought of him, he would have long ago left the country to live the rest of his life caring for the destitute of Mongolia. Men like Fred the Shred do not feel shame. They feel only for their wallets.

On the other side of the Atlantic, Barack Obama has had a clearer eye about what he is dealing with, and therefore a firmer grasp of what needs to be done. The president, being new to office and of a younger generation than Gordon Brown, is not trapped by the past compromises with casino capitalism which were made by the prime minister and other centre-left leaders of his vintage. Obama did not hesitate. He crisply told bankers that their salaries would be capped and that they could forget about pocketing any more bonuses until the taxpayers had got their money back.

In his speech a few days ago to both houses of Congress, the new president gave a compelling and unflinching account of the vices of the bubble years. "The fact is our economy did not fall into decline overnight," he told America. "We have lived through an era where too often short-term gains were prized over long-term prosperity." He used the pulpit of the presidency to tell his people that they had arrived at a "day of reckoning".

Follow that, Mr Brown. Actually, the prime minister does have to follow that. He is flying to Washington this week where he will both meet the president and address a joint session of Congress. It is a rare honour for a foreign leader to receive this invitation and Mr Brown is justly proud to be joining the company of Winston Churchill, Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair. It may be an added satisfaction to Mr Brown that his predecessor wasn't rewarded with this accolade until he'd been prime minister for six years and joined George Bush's war in Iraq.

When they first knew they had landed this big gig for Mr Brown in Washington, Number 10 got terribly excited. Now, as the deadline to the speech approaches, they are feeling increasingly anxious. The prime minister knows this is a very important speech for his reputation on both sides of the Atlantic. Over the last week, he has spent more working hours labouring over his address to Congress than he has devoted to anything else. His most senior aides and closest allies in the cabinet have been in and out of his office from very early in the morning - a seven o'clock summons has been typical - to help the prime minister prepare for his glittering moment on Capitol Hill.

In some senses, it is not a speech that can fail. Congress is extremely polite to visiting leaders. Mr Brown's rhetorical style may not be one that Americans are all that familiar with, but they will applaud him nevertheless. He could read out the Kirkcaldy phone directory and he would still be guaranteed several standing ovations. If inspiration fails him, he can always serve up a routine speech extolling the Special Relationship. His audience will applaud a lot, inwardly yawn, and then everyone will go home feeling none the wiser. So he needs to deliver something more ambitious, more interesting and more challenging than that.

The rarity and glamour of this occasion means that this is a speech that the prime minister can use to address not just America, but also to grab the attention of his domestic audience too. There is more of a chance that British voters will tune into the prime minister when he addresses them from such a big stage as Capitol Hill. Some of his confidants in the cabinet worry that the spectacle of Mr Brown grandstanding in America could backfire with British voters if he does not have something to say which resonates with them and their concerns.

I recommend that the prime minister watches Obama's address to Congress. That succeeded because he gave a candid account of what went wrong during the bubble years and that allowed him to be persuasive about how it can be put right. How does Gordon Brown follow that? He could do a lot worse than copy it.

The interview: David Lynch - The Guardian, ok - link (aqui)

David Lynch photographed at the Imperial Hotel, Vienna Photograph: Karl Schoendorfer/Rex Features


With his enigmatic masterpieces Blue Velvet, Twin Peaks and Mulholland Drive, the director created a dark, disturbing vision of America. Now, he says, he is done with films in favour of making art from paint, cameras and 'toxic materials' – and practising transcendental meditation. He talks to Gaby Wood. Portrait by Jérôme Bonnet

Gaby Wood and Hazel Sheffield
The Observer, Sunday 1 March 2009

Up a steep, strange, snake of a street and sheer, straight steps is a set of concrete buildings clinging onto the side of the Hollywood Hills. In an attempt to penetrate the bunker (I have an appointment, after all) I mistakenly walk into an empty recording studio, where a state-of-the-art mixing table spans several metres and a blank cinema screen covers a wall in front of it. Beyond this, the place is all skylights and high slit windows – a bright but viewless series of rooms with severe angles and unpredictable shifts, blind corners around which are an empty kitchen or an empty meeting room with a single lightbulb drawn in chalk on a blackboard. Once inside, its geography is impossible to decipher.

I have come to meet David Lynch, who lives, works and meditates here – the bunker includes offices, an outdoor painting studio and a home. Lynch has just brought out a lavish retrospective set of DVDs, which includes (among other things) material from his student days that he found in a foot locker, a brand new sound mix of Blue Velvet, Eraserhead, The Elephant Man and deleted scenes from Wild at Heart – all of which makes one wonder where he's been in more recent years. Mulholland Drive – an unparalleled triumph in my view – was released in 2001; since then he's made some entertainingly loopy shorts and Inland Empire, a three-hour ode to impenetrability that was shot on digital video and struggled to find a distributor . "I'm through with film as a medium," he wrote in a book published two years ago. "For me, film is dead." What ever happened to David Lynch?

He enters, a dishevelled version of himself: the rockabilly hair caving at an angle, the buttoned-up white shirt not as neat as it might be, silvery stubble on his chin. He offers me a coffee – his own brand, of which he drinks at least 15 cups a day – and settles into a battered armchair with a packet of American Spirit cigarettes. The concrete floors turn out to have a practical purpose: you can routinely drop cigarette ash on them without worrying about starting a fire (the chair in Lynch's studio is forever at risk of being buried in butts).

"I just love this camera," Lynch says, in his nasal, deliberate, almost robotically enthusiastic voice. We are looking at a large chiaroscuro nude, which has been printed in two parts and hung on the wall, and Lynch is telling me about his Hasselblad digital. Unbelievable. Thirty-nine million pixels. The camera remembers something like 4,000 pieces of information per photograph. It is machine. It's a machine." A look of delight passes across his face. "It's just a glorious world," he says.

Lynch has been taking a great deal of photographs some of which will be shown as part of the Format09 photography festival in Derby this month – and they have long been a component in his mixed-media canvases. He says he mainly likes to photograph nudes and factories, a curious combination until you see that the factories are defunct, celebrated for their decay and decomposition in a way that renders them organic – like the nudes, they seem stripped bare and almost mortal.

In 2007, the Fondation Cartier in Paris put together a big show of Lynch's artwork spanning more than 40 years. There were Keith Haring-like doodles and sketches on napkins; there were his taxonomic boards: a disassembled fish or pinneddown bees with names like Chuck, Bing, Ralph and Hank; there were large paintings that incorporated clothes, watches and words scrawled in oil paint. Lynch says he is now working on a new series of paintings – though the weather in Los Angeles this week has stalled him somewhat: it's unusually cold and gloomy, and Lynch works outdoors because he tends to use "toxic materials". These particular works include tile glue and cotton balls and, "you know, lightbulbs".

The muscular nature of Lynch's work is not something often associated with him. He's thought to be a reticent cinematic visionary, yet most of his time, when he's not working on a film (and just now he is not), is spent creating these sprawling two-dimensional works involving electric saws, brown sludge and molten plastic. A recent documentary (Lynch (One)) shows him doing this himself, always in his uniform of baggy beige chinos and buttoned-up shirt – the buttons are done even when the shirt is spattered with paint or half hanging out of his trousers. He is more Jackson Pollock than François Truffaut.

"I love paint," he says, in the same mechanical tone he used to describe his camera. "I like watercolours. I like acrylic paint … a little bit. I like house paint. I like oil-based paint, and I love oil paint. I love the smell of turpentine and I like that world of oil paint very, very, very much."

There are two traditional views of Lynch in person: either that he is as weird as his films suggest, or that he's unnervingly, wholesomely ordinary. The fact is, he doesn't like talking about his work. As Chris Rodley writes in his book of interviews, Lynch on Lynch: "Nowadays, a director's commentary on a movie's DVD release is standard issue. For Lynch, this is the very definition of a nightmare situation."

For instance, here is Lynch, when I meet him, on how his films come together. He speaks slowly, as if teaching me the basics of his mysterious art: "Sometimes I get an idea for cinema. And when you get an idea that you fall in love with, this is a glorious day. That idea may just be 1a fragment, but it holds something. It might be a scene, or a part of a scene, or a character, or a way the character talks, a light or a feel ... You write that idea down. And thinking about that idea will bring other ideas in – there's a hook to it. And things start to emerge. And then you see, one day, a script. A script is just words to remind you of the ideas. And you follow that, but always staying on guard, in case other ideas come in, because a thing isn't finished till it's finished. And one day, it's finished."

"Christ!" I thought when I heard this, "What am I supposed to do with that?" In the course of our interview Lynch had made (I felt) a series of didactic yet meaningless speeches of varying length, none of which lent itself to illustrating any particular point. But afterwards I found myself laughing, because I realised he was not so much unforthcoming as bordering on the Delphic. He is – unbudgingly, impenetrably, but nevertheless magnificently – a character of his own making.

In his movies the characters who talk like this – a sort of scattershot guru-speak, in which sayings are either wise or total rubbish, depending on what sticks – are fortune-tellers, random ciphers or mysterious orchestrators of strange plots (the dancing dwarf in Twin Peaks, the Cowboy in Mulholland Drive, the witchy neighbour in Inland Empire). In other words, the most unnatural among the dramatis personae. But when you listen to Lynch you realise they are (in their delivery at least) the most natural, the most like him.

Lynch was born in Missoula, Montana in 1946, and brought up in various places around the US, depending on where his father's job as a research scientist for the Department of Agriculture took him.

"I think his happiest time," Lynch says of his dad, "was when he had the Boise National Experimental Forest. A whole forest to experiment with! Things like erosion, bugs – so many different kinds of bugs – disease … And I loved going into that wood. There were little stands with little houses on the stands, and you'd open up the door and there'd be all kinds of weather equipment in there – little read-outs. It was really kind of great."

If there are two things from Lynch's childhood that have continued to influence him, it's experimentation with organic phenomena and the strangely polarised era that was the 1950s. He loved the jitterbug, the big cars, the picket fences and the sound of planes flying overhead – a child's view of an idyllic time. But the 50s were also about appearances: this very idyll masked warring agendas – things people refused to know and other, often incorrect, things they insisted on knowing.

"All the problems were there," he once explained, referring at least to the atomic bomb, and probably to McCarthy, "but it was somehow glossed over. And then the gloss broke, or rotted, and it all came oozing out." In a now-famous quote published in Lynch on Lynch, he explained that he'd grown up in "middle America as it's supposed to be. But on the cherry tree there's this pitch oozing out – some black, some yellow, and millions of red ants crawling all over it. I discovered that if one looks a little closer at this beautiful world, there are always red ants underneath."

The reason this has been quoted so often is that it seems an apt distillation of Lynch's imagination – a version in words of the unforgettable image in Blue Velvet of a perfect lawn leading to a severed ear and the insect-ridden earth. For those seeking weirdness in Lynch's life, it's almost a relief to hear that he once asked a vet for a cat's corpse so he could dissect it ( just out of interest), or that he once owned a pickled uterus. But if you understand him as the son of a scientist and a housewife called Sunny, as an experimenter as well as a dreamy fi lmmaker, none of this really seems odd.

The shorthand for Lynch's interest in things is "nerdy" – whether it's cameras, music, weather or the effects of transcendental meditation, which he has been practising twice a day since 1974. But he could be thought of more as an old-fashioned natural philosopher – someone for whom dissection, technology and the unconscious all exist on a single plane of curiosity. When I ask him whether he has visited Thomas Edison's factory, thinking this would be up his photographic street, he replies immediately: "No. I don't like Thomas Edison. I'm a fan of Nicolai Tesla," fervently taking sides about these two 19th-century inventors as if they were contemporary politicians.

In 1967, Lynch was a student at the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts. He had made a painting and he wanted to "see it move". So he projected a one-minute animation onto a sculptured screen and added a siren soundtrack on a loop. The result, Six Men Getting Sick – which was shot on reversal film so has no negative – is mesmerising. Painted heads grow tubes, exposed stomachs and random hands; an x-ray of a torso is added; the ground changes from white to black to red to purple, and fountains of white paint emerge from the heads and spatter the canvas.

It was his next short film, The Alphabet, that gave him "the bug". Then he made a 34-minute film based on a dense, eight-page script (The Grandmother), and by the time he came to shoot Eraserhead, which took four years and became at one point Stanley Kubrick 's favourite film, Lynch had settled on the convoluted logic of a lifetime. The oozing mechanical chickens, the slimy foetal offspring, performing ladies in steaming radiators, dissolving beds, electric hair, a severed head. Even the theatrical, curtained room with a black and white floor – a signature in Twin Peaks – was already there.

Many consider Blue Velvet his greatest picture (he had made the classical Elephant Man by then and the sci-fi curio Dune); others prefer Wild at Heart or the Twin Peaks series, which was justifiably cultish. Lost Highway has fewer fans, and The Straight Story, a faithfully linear narrative, was considered un-Lynchian.

But Mulholland Drive, which so divided critics that serious public rows were had over the film's meaning, is a work of sheer genius. It's like a Lynch movie about a Lynch movie – dream logic imposed onto dream logic, with many of his favourite themes reshuffled to create a new order in homage to Hollywood. Yet it's possible that, having disassembled the grammar of cinema so fruitfully, he has committed – perhaps condemned – his films to be forever broken down, re-syntaxed.

Mulholland Drive was originally made as a pilot for a TV series, like Twin Peaks. But the ABC executive who was to decide whether or not to commission it watched the pilot at six in the morning while having a coffee and making some phone calls. He turned it down. Lynch eventually made it as a film, of course, but years later, inspired by the intuitive way he'd worked on Mulholland Drive, he dived into Inland Empire, which stars Laura Dern, Justin Theroux and Jeremy Irons, shooting it "scene by scene, not knowing". The Lynch documentary observes him mid-experiment. At one point he says: "I'm so depressed I don't know what I'm doing." The result was, in his own description, "the kiss of death for a distributor".

I ask him if he ever worries that he won't get funding.

"No," he smiles benignly, "I don't care." Then he explains: "See, a painting is much cheaper than making a film. And photography is, you know, way cheap. So if I get an idea for a film, there are many ways to get it together and go realise that film. There's really nothing to be afraid of."

Is there a future in filmmaking that's funded differently, I wonder?

Lynch says it's distribution that's difficult. "Now there's the internet, you can distribute anything. The problem is, how do you get money for it? … It's gonna be very tough, coming up."

Are you in touch with a younger generation of filmmakers? I ask.

Lynch smiles. "No, I'm not in touch with an older generation! ... People think in Hollywood there's a family, where everybody gets together talks about stuff and we all know each other, and it's just not that way at all to me."

"How is it to you?"

"I like to work, so how it is, is work."

"But you meet people in the evenings, presumably?"

Lynch laughs and splutters at the thought. "I don't meet anybody! How would you meet anyone? – you gotta go out. Where are you gonna go?"

Lynch has a gratifyingly wicked sense of humour. It comes on slowly, then pans out into a big, boyish smile.

As it happens, Lynch doesn't seem to have a problem meeting new people. Last week, he got married for the fourth time – to a 26-year-old actress named Emily Stofle, who appeared without many clothes in Inland Empire. (Lynch's long-time composer-collaborator Angelo Badalamenti calls me from Beverly Hills on Friday morning, after "a late night of lots of champagne".) I'm not the first to wonder how someone who is so evangelically "blissed out" can live through the un-bliss of three divorces (he has a child from each marriage) and a well-publicised break up with Isabella Rossellini. To this Lynch will only say: "We live in the field of relativity. Things change."

On the subject of bliss, though, I inquire about the David Lynch Foundation, founded in July 2005 , which aims to spread the teaching of transcendental meditation in schools – encouraging, by extension, world peace. (The so-called "Maharishi effect" decrees that if the square root of 1% of any population practises transcendental meditation, it will produce measurable improvements in the quality of life, "thus creating sustainable world peace".)

"It's having incredible success," Lynch says proudly. There are now 20 schools – some of them once the worst in their state – that practise TM as a school twice a day. "The teachers say: Billy now is focusing. The students are sleeping better at night, they've got way more energy, they start liking themselves."

In contrast to many other things, "diving within" – or the "unbounded, infinite, eternal, immutable, immortal level" of experience – is a subject about which Lynch could speak forever. "Before I started, I thought maybe it was some kind of mind control," he admits. But when he was given his mantra and began, "It was as if I was in an elevator and somebody had cut the cable. Pooooookkkhhh! Into the thickest, most beautiful bliss ever. And I said: 'Where has this experience in life been?'"

"How young can you start?" I ask. Lynch's assistant has told us it's time to stop and we're getting up from our seats.

"You can get your walking mantra when you're old enough to keep a secret," he says, adding, "Five or six."

I'm not sure I'm old enough to keep a secret now, I mutter.

Lynch seems mildly amused. "You're old enough."

He shakes my hand and smiles that neighbourly smile. But he doesn't say "Goodbye" or "Nice to meet you." Instead, in a tone that suggests both a father in a 1950s TV series and an otherworldly being who may know more than you care to contemplate, he says: "Stay outta trouble, Gaby."

Then he picks up his cigarettes and walks toward the door.

Lynch pins: a director's life

Early life Born in Montana, 1946 . Father a research scientist and mother an English tutor. Lynch attended Boston School of Fine Art for a year before embarking on a failed trip to Europe. He later graduated from art school in Phildelphia, Pennsylvania, the city which inspired 1977's Eraserhead.

1980 Earns Academy award nominations for best director and best adapted screenplay for The Elephant Man.

1984 Directs Dune, a hugely expensive commercial and critical disaster.

1986 Blue Velvet released.

1990 Directs Wild At Heart and cult television series Twin Peaks.

1997 Lost Highway

2001 Mulholland Drive

Personal life Lynch has been married four times and had well publicised affair with the actress Isabella Rossellini in the 80s. He has three children from different mothers. Recently remarried, he now lives with his current wife, the actress Emily Stofle, in Los Angeles.

He says "If you stay true to your ideas, film-making becomes an inside-out, honest kind of process. And … there's a chance that people will feel that, even if it's abstract."

Isabella Rossellini on Blue Velvet "David Lynch came out of it a genius, and I came out of it a fat girl … the only comment I get about the part is the way I look."

Protectionnisme: Paris s'adoucit pour sauver le sommet européen - Libération, fr - link (aqui)

(AFP DAMIEN MEYER)

28/02/2009 à 15h38
La Commission européenne a obtenu des garanties du gouvernement français, qui ne conditionne plus ses aides à la localisation des activités en France. Un geste qui devrait sauver le sommet européen de dimanche.

La Commission européenne a donné samedi moyennant des "garanties" son feu vert au plan français d'aide à l'automobile, désamorçant l'un des principaux éléments de la querelle sur le protectionnisme qui menaçait de gâcher le sommet européen de dimanche.

La commissaire européenne à la Concurrence, Neelie Kroes, s'est dite "satisfaite des garanties présentées par les autorités françaises sur l'absence de caractère protectionniste du plan d'aide au secteur automobile", dans un communiqué.

"Il était important que la Commission lève toute ambiguïté", car "l'Europe ne peut se permettre un retour au protectionnisme et ses conséquences négatives sur l'emploi au niveau européen", a-t-elle ajouté.

Le plan français annoncé le 9 février prévoit d'accorder 7,8 milliards d'euros d'aides au secteur, dont 6 milliards de prêts à taux préférentiels pour les constructeurs français Renault et PSA Peugeot Citroën.

L'automobile est frappée de plein fouet par la crise. Les dirigeants européens disent tous vouloir s'efforcer de préserver les 12 millions d'emplois qu'elle représente.

Mais la polémique venait de ce que le président Nicolas Sarkozy avait conditionné l'octroi des aides gouvernementales à un engagement des constructeurs à maintenir leurs usines en France et à ne pas délocaliser "en Tchéquie ou ailleurs".

Le Premier ministre libéral tchèque Mirek Topolanek, dont le pays est le premier producteur d'automobiles à l'est de l'Europe, avait qualifié d'"inacceptables" ces mesures "protectionnistes" françaises. Et recueilli l'appui de nombreux pays de l'UE face à la France.

La Commission l'avait soutenu en avertissant que des conditions de maintien de l'emploi en France seraient contraires aux traités européens.

PARIS PROMET DE RESPECTER LES REGLES EUROPEENNES

Après des discussions parfois tendues, "les autorités françaises se sont engagées à ne pas mettre en oeuvre de mesures d'aide au secteur automobile qui contreviendraient aux principes du marché intérieur", a rapporté la Commission.

La France s'est notamment engagée à ce que "les conventions de prêt avec les constructeurs automobiles ne contiennent aucune condition relevant de la localisation de leurs activités ou de l'approvisionnement en priorité auprès de fournisseurs installés en France", a précisé l'exécutif européen.

Paris a-t-il pour autant renoncé à obtenir un engagement "moral" des constructeurs à maintenir leurs usines en France? Cela reste à confirmer.

Un diplomate français avait encore répété vendredi que Paris jugeait qu'une telle contrepartie était "le minimum à attendre" des constructeurs bénéficiaires de l'aide publique.

Le secrétaire d'Etat à l'Industrie Luc Chatel a assuré samedi que le feu vert de la Commission européenne au plan français de soutien au secteur automobile ne remet pas en cause les engagements pris par les constructeurs de maintenir leur activité en France.

"Nous n'avons jamais exigé que les constructeurs Renault et PSA rapatrient leurs activités en France. Mais nous leur avons demandé de ne pas fermer leurs usines en France et nous leur donnons les moyens d'améliorer leur compétitivité", a-t-il précisé.

ATMOSPHERE DETENDUE POUR LE SOMMET

Même si la Commission a prévenu qu'elle resterait "attentive aux conditions de mise en oeuvre" du plan français, son satisfecit de samedi devrait permettre de détendre une atmosphère qui s'annonçait chargée au sommet européen de dimanche.

Signe des tensions des dernières semaines, neuf pays de l'Est, dont la République tchèque, se réuniront dimanche en mini-sommet juste avant le sommet à 27 pays.

Outre leur opposition à tout protectionnisme, beaucoup de pays de l'Est jugent leurs partenaires de l'Ouest pas assez solidaires face aux graves problèmes de liquidités et de changes que connaissent notamment la Hongrie et la Lettonie.

Samedi, le Premier ministre tchèque Mirek Topolanek a encore appelé ses partenaires à éviter toute nouvelle division de l'Europe et à faire preuve de solidarité.

"Nous ne voulons pas de nouvelles lignes de divisions, nous ne voulons pas une Europe divisée selon une ligne Nord-Sud ou Est-Ouest", a-t-il déclaré, en soulignant l'importance de maintenir le marché intérieur "uni".

L'UE donne son feu vert au plan automobile français - Le Figaro,fr - link (aqui)

Le plan automobile français était accusé de «protectionnisme» par plusieurs pays de l'UE.

Bastien Hugues (lefigaro.fr) avec AFP
01/03/2009 | Mise à jour : 00:45

La Commission européenne se dit «satisfaite des garanties présentées» par Paris, qui ne revient cependant pas sur l'engagement de non-délocalisation des constructeurs aidés.

Nicolas Sarkozy avait posé une condition majeure aux prêts que le gouvernement accorderait au secteur automobile : que les entreprises aidées s'engagent à ne pas délocaliser leurs activités en dehors de l'Hexagone. Accusé de protectionnisme par plusieurs voisins européens, Paris a revu sa copie, sans pour autant renoncer à exiger des engagements de non-délocalisation de la part des constructeurs aidés. Suffisant pour obtenir l'aval de Bruxelles.

Samedi, la commissaire européenne à la Concurrence, Neelie Kroes, s'est dite satisfaite des «garanties présentées» par les autorités françaises sur «l'absence de caractère protectionniste» du plan français. Bruxelles et Paris désamorcent ainsi l'un des principaux éléments de la querelle sur le protectionnisme, qui menaçait de gâcher le sommet européen de dimanche. Et Neelie Kroes d'insister : «il était important que la Commission lève toute ambiguïté», car «l'Europe ne peut se permettre un retour au protectionnisme et ses conséquences négatives sur l'emploi au niveau européen»

Le plan français annoncé le 9 février prévoit d'accorder 7,8 milliards d'euros d'aides au secteur, dont 6 milliards de prêts à taux préférentiels pour les constructeurs français Renault et PSA Peugeot Citroën. L'automobile est une des industries les plus touchées par la crise.

Tout le monde en Europe dit vouloir s'efforcer de préserver les 12 millions d'emplois qu'elle représente. Mais la polémique venait des conditions que le président Nicolas Sarkozy avait posé pour bénéficier des aides gouvernementales, et tout particulièrement celle qui engageait les constructeurs à maintenir leurs usines en France et à ne pas délocaliser «en Tchéquie ou ailleurs».

Le premier ministre libéral tchèque Mirek Topolanek, dont le pays est le premier producteur d'automobiles à l'est de l'Europe, avait qualifié ces mesures «protectionnistes» d' «inacceptables». Et recueilli l'appui de nombreux pays de l'UE face à la France.

Paris ne renonce pas à l'engagement de non-délocalisation

Afin de mettre un terme à la polémique, la France s'est notamment engagée à ce que «les conventions de prêt avec les constructeurs automobiles ne contiennent aucune condition relevant de la localisation de leurs activités ou de l'approvisionnement en priorité auprès de fournisseurs installés en France», a précisé l'exécutif européen.

Paris a-t-il pour autant renoncé à obtenir un engagement «moral» des constructeurs à maintenir leurs usines en France ? Non, a assuré samedi après-midi le secrétaire d'Etat à l'Industrie Luc Chatel : «nous n'avons jamais exigé que les constructeurs Renault et PSA rapatrient leurs activités en France. Mais nous leur avons demandé de ne pas fermer leurs usines en France et nous leur donnons les moyens d'améliorer leur compétitivité.» Contactée par lefigaro.fr samedi après-midi, l'Elysée n'a pas souhaité faire de commentaire sur le sujet dans l'immédiat.

Tout en indiquant espérer un feu vert imminent de Bruxelles, un diplomate français avait encore répété vendredi que Paris jugeait qu'une telle contrepartie était «le minimum à attendre» des constructeurs bénéficiaires de l'aide publique.

Vertice Ue contro la crisi economica - La Stampa, it - link (aqui)

Oggi a Bruxelles il vertice dell'Ue

1/3/2009 (9:54) - BRUXELLES

Sul tavolo il protezionismo e il
nodo degli aiuti all'Est europeo
BRUXELLES
Si riuniscono oggi a Bruxelles i i capi di Stato e di Governo europei per tre ore di vertice informale, dalle 13 alle 16, indetto dalla presidenza ceca sulla crisi dell’economia. Sul tavolo, ufficialmente, i temi del rilancio, la supervisione dei mercati finanziari, ma anche il settore dell’auto e preparazione della riunione del G20 di aprile. Ma alla presenza del presidente della Commissione europea, José Manuel Barroso, e del governatore della Banca centrale europea, Jean-Claude Trichet, i 27 si troveranno ad discutere per la prima volta tutti insieme di persona del vero tema che sta intossicando il dibattito europeo, nonostante le mille dichiarazioni di facciata: il protezionismo e l’irritazione che provoca soprattutto nei paesi della Nuova Europa.

E proprio a dimostrazione di queste tensioni, nove paesi dell’est si incontreranno alle 11 su iniziativa del premier polacco Donald Tusk per un "pre-vertice". Repubblica ceca, Romania, Bulgaria, Lituania, Lettonia, Estonia, Polonia, Slovacchia e Ungheria, che hanno visto la loro vivace crescita economica interrotta bruscamente, lamentano di non ricevere un aiuto sufficiente davanti alla crisi finanziaria da parte dell’Unione europea. Il premier ungherese, Ferenc Gyurcsany, il cui paese, come la Lettonia, ha già dovuto far ricorso all’aiuto del Fondo monetario internazionale, ha annunciato che chiederà un nuovo piano europeo di sostegno da 100 miliardi di euro alle banche dell’est; cifra che potrebbe salire. È di due giorni fa l’annuncio di un piano da 24,5 miliardi di euro per aiutare banche e imprese dell’est dalla Banca europea degli investimenti, giunto dalla Banca europea per la ricostruzione e lo sviluppo e dalla Banca mondiale, ma non basta ai leader della Nuova Europa. Secondo il direttore generale del Fmi Dominique Strauss-Kahn, l’iniziativa congiunta Bers-Bei-Banca Mondiale «aiuterà a mitigare gli effetti della crisi finanziaria e del flusso di crediti nella regione».

Soddisfatta Bruxelles, che però resta molto abbottonata sull’opportunità di rilanciare a sua volta. «Pensiamo che mitigare gli effetti ed alla fine risolvere la crisi sia una responsabilità condivisa di tutte le parti in causa, e questo richiede un intervento coordinato a tutti i livelli», ha riferito il portavoce comunitario, Amadeu Altafaj-Tardio, elencando quello che la Commissione ha già fatto per aiutare l’Europa dell’Est: dall’anticipazione dei fondi strutturali nel 2009 (2,3 miliardi di euro in più) all’aumento da 12 a 25 miliardi di euro del fondo di emergenza Ue per i Paesi in crisi, senza dimenticare i fondi per i Balcani (150 milioni di euro, che dovrebbero attrarre altri 600 milioni di investimenti, più i fondi da Bers, Bei e Bm per un totale di 5,5 miliardi). Ungheria e Polonia hanno inoltre chiesto questa settimana di accelerare il loro ingresso nella zona euro, ma, consapevoli delle difficoltà che ci sarebbero ad ammorbidire i criteri di allargamento di Eurolandia, dovrebbero finire con l’insistere soprattutto sul tema del protezionismo (e del resto a Varsavia l’europeista Tusk si scontra con le diffidenza verso la moneta unica del presidente della Repubblica, Lech Kaczynski; ma il cambio dello zloty ha perso il 30% da sei mesi).

I nuovi paesi membri dell’Ue sostengono infatti la presidenza ceca dell’Ue nella disputa che l’ha contrapposta alla Francia nelle ultime settimane. Il presidente francese Nicolas Sarkozy ha profondamente irritato Praga annunciando che il suo piano di aiuti all’industria dell’auto sarà condizionato alla proibizione per le industrie francesi di qualunque delocalizzazione «in Repubblica ceca o altrove». Il premier liberale Mirek Topolanek, il cui paese è il primo produttore di auto nell’Europa dell’est, ha denunciato subito un «protezionismo» inaccettabile. «Dobbiamo lavorare insieme nei prossimi tre mesi per sviluppare idee concrete per dare speranza e rassicurazioni ai cittadini europei», ha spiegato Barroso in una lettera ai leader Ue. Il tema dell’automobile sarà sul tavolo con la discussione del rapporto presentato la settimana scorsa dalla Commissione. All’ordine del giorno di domenica ci sarà anche un intervento di Gordon Brown sul vertice del G20 che si terrà il 2 aprile a Londra.

E anche questo è un punto scottante, poiché dopo il vertice dei paesi europei del G20 che si è svolto a Berlino la settimana scorsa, numerosi Stati Ue, tra cui il Lussemburgo, il Belgio e la Svezia, si sono lamentati id essere esclusi dagli incontri ristretti che si vanno moltiplicando dall’inizio della crisi. «Ora c’è questa mentalità nell’Ue che i grandi paesi decidono e che i piccoli e i medi seguono», ha spiegato il capo della diplomazia lussemburghese, John Asselborn, osservando: «L’Ue non può mettere tutta la sua energia nella lotta alla crisi se non è solidale».

Obama difende la sua finanziaria "Pronto alla lotta contro le lobby" - la Repubblica, it - link (aqui)



l presidente lancia la sfida: "E' il cambiamento che ho promesso"
"Non passerà facilmente, minaccia lo status quo di Washington"


Obama difende la sua finanziaria "Pronto alla lotta contro le lobby"

Barack Obama

WASHINGTON - Barack Obama difende con fermezza il suo piano economico ed è pronto a lottare contro le lobby che cercheranno di smantellarlo. "So che non passerà facilmente", ha ammesso il presidente degli Stati Uniti, perchè "rappresenta una minaccia allo status quo di Washington". Una chiara sfida alle lobby dell'industria Usa e ai repubblicani che hanno già fatto sapere di essere pronti a votargli contro e a non accettare i suoi provvedimenti, che prevedono, fra l'altro, più tasse per le classi abbienti.

Obama ha parlato oggi dalla stanza ovale, nel suo consueto video-messaggio del sabato agli americani: "Questo è il cambiamento che ho promesso sin da quando mi sono candidato alla presidenza - ha spiegato - è il cambiamento che gli americani hanno votato a novembre e proprio questo rappresenta il bilancio che questa settimana ho presentato al Congresso".

"So che questi provvedimenti - ha detto Obama - non andranno d'accordo con gli interessi dei lobbisti che hanno investito sulla vecchia maniera di fare affari e io so che si stanno preparando alla lotta. Il mio messaggio a loro è questo: anche io". "So - ha proseguito Obama - che l'industria assicurativa non amerà l'idea di dover diventare più competitiva per continuare a offrire la copertura medica". "So anche - ha aggiunto - che le banche e i grandi creditori agli studenti non ameranno lo stop agli enormi sussidi a loro accordati, ma così abbiamo salvato circa 50 miliardi di dollari per rendere i college più finanziariamente accessibili". Allo stesso modo, ha detto Obama, "le compagnie petrolifere non ameranno l'interruzione delle facilitazioni fiscali per 30 miliardi di dollari, ma è così che possiamo permettere all'economia delle energie rinnovabili di creare nuovi progetti e posti di lavoro".

Obama ha quindi ribadito le promesse fatte in campagna elettorale, un mix "che permetterà di tagliare le tasse del 95% agli americani che lavorano" e "di eliminare gli aiuti fiscali a chi guadagna oltre 250mila dollari l'anno e alle corporazioni che portano oltreoceano i nostri posti di lavoro. E' questo che farà questo bilancio". "Mi rendo conto - ha quindi concluso Obama - che far passare questo provvedimento non sarà facile perchè rappresenta un reale e incredibile cambiamento nonchè una minaccia allo status quo di Washington". Ma, ha aggiunto Barack, "io lavoro per gli americani e non sono venuto qui per fare le stesse cose che sono già state fatte". Questo cambiamento "farà crescere la nostra economia, allargare la nostra classe media e mantenere vivo il sogno americano per tutti gli uomini e le donne che hanno creduto in questo viaggio nel momento in cui è iniziato".

(28 febbraio 2009)

Il mondo dei Samurai in mostra a Milano Goldrake? Come Miyamoto Musashi - il Messaggero, it - link (aqui)


di Maria Grazia Filippi
ROMA (28 febbraio) - Goldrake come Miyamoto Musashi. Il più famoso robot del mondo dei cartoni animati, vera e propria stella del firmamento dei cartoon televisivi della metà degli anni '70, accanto a uno dei samurai tra i più noti nella storia settecentenaria della casta di guerrieri giapponesi, il più grande maestro dell’arte della spada e protagonista del famoso romanzo di Yoshikawa Eiji, venduto in oltre centoventimilioni di copie e ispiratore di almeno quindici versioni cinematografiche. Per entrambi armature sontuose e invincibili. Colori sgargianti e un codice di comportamento che esalta l'amicizia a e la fedeltà, l'onore e il rispetto.

Un accostamento per niente ardito, ma anzi doveroso e affatto irrispettoso, protagonista in questi giorni a Milano della mostra Samurai a Palazzo Reale fino al 2 giugno. Una mostra, una novantina di pezzi tra armature, elmi e accessori provenienti dalla collezione Koelliker oltre ad una serie di opere provenienti dalle Civiche Raccolte d'Arti Applicate di Milano, che ha ovviamente l'obiettivo di ricostruire la storia sociale, politica ed economica della casta militare che governò il Giappone per quasi sette secoli.
«Abbiamo voluto mettere in evidenza come la produzione di cartoni animati che ebbero così successo negli anni '70 e '80 sia strettamente legata al mondo dei Samurai da cui ha ereditato l'eleganza e la potenza delle armature ma anche il complesso di valori che rappresentava nelle sue storie – spiega l'antiquario d'arte giapponese Giuseppe Piva, curatore della mostra per la Fondazione Mazzotta – non è un caso che tra le splendide armature portate in esposizione e i modelli dei cartoni animati originali e arrivati direttamente dal Giappone ci sia una forte corrispondenza di forme e colori. I guerrieri animati, nei loro cartoni, raccontavano storie d'onore e di guerre che derivano direttamente dal mondo samurai. I super robot, come Goldrake e Gundam – continua Piva - si possono considerare eredi della tradizione marziale giapponese: enormi samurai d’acciaio concepiti dal Giappone più tecnologico. In questi robot si condensa tutto lo spirito, tradizionale e moderno, del Sol Levante: a una tecnologia fantastica e d’avanguardia si coniuga l’antico rispetto per l’arte della guerra, la passione per i karakuri (gli automi antichi) e l’ottemperanza per l’etica che costituisce lo“Spirito del Giappone”. E Actarus, il pilota di Goldrake, alla guida del suo robot gigante è l’espressione di questo spirito che cerca di sopravvivere, nonostante la modernità, nonostante tutto». E per questo l'allestimento dell'ultima sala della mostra, curato da Yamato Video, è interamente dedicato a questo “passaggio di testimone.

Ma Samurai non è solo un'esposizione ma anche una full immersion nel mondo poetico, ma retto da regole severe e da rigidi cerimoniali, di una casta ormai estinta e raccontata solo attraverso molto cinema e molta letteratura (e a proposito ci spiega Piva sono assolutamente credibili le poetiche ricostruzioni della cerimonia della vestizione del samurai che abbiamo molto amato nell'hollywoodiano L'ultimo samurai di Edward Zwick con Tom Cruise). Per tutto il periodo la visione delle splendide e mastodontiche armature, molte arrivano a un metro e ottanta di altezza e possono arrivare anche a 20 chili, si affianca ad una serie di eventi collaterali molto “giapan lifestyle”: incontri e serate dove si parlerà di musica e cinema giapponese, della cerimonia del te, dell'arte del bonsai e dell'origami, della casa del samurai e della cucina zen.
«I Samurai erano una casta di guerrieri ma la mostra non racconta un mondo di guerre – conclude Giuseppe Piva – anzi, quasi tutte quelle esposte sono armature da parata e risalgono al lungo periodo di pace chiamato “Edo” e che arriva fino al 1867, quando la casta venne eliminata e i suoi poteri passarono all'Imperatore. Le armature venivano quindi utilizzate per cortei e sfilate assolutamente pacifiche ma questo però non deve trarre in inganno: le loro dimensioni e il loro peso è assolutamente autentico e spesso furono ricostruite fedelmente su modelli “da guerra”. Né pietre preziose, né gioielli per decorarle. Solo madreperla. Ma il loro valore, spropositato per la stragrande maggioranza della popolazione di quei tempi,era dato dalla lavorazione e dalla qualità eccelsa che gli era garantita dalla perizia dei maestri armaioli che le realizzarono».


Samurai
A cura di Giuseppe Piva e della Fondazione Antonio Mazzotta
Periodo: 25 febbraio – 2 giugno 2009
Sede: Palazzo Reale Piazza del Duomo 12, Milano
Informazioni: INFOLINE 02.54913, www.mostrasamurai.it
www.mazzotta.it;
www.comune.milano.it/palazzoreale
Orario: tutti i giorni 9.30/19.30; lunedì 14.30/19.30; giovedì 9.30/22.30
Aperta con orario normale: 12 aprile, 13 aprile, 25 aprile, 1° maggio, 2 giugno 2009
Biglietto d’ingresso: intero € 8,00; ridotto € 6,00, scuole € 4,00
Catalogo con testi di Giuseppe Piva, Francesco Civita, Gianni Fodella
Edizioni Gabriele Mazzotta (€ 30,00 in libreria, € 20,00 in mostra)

Libro electrónico: ruegos y preguntas - El País, es - link (aqui)

El sector editorial se debate entre el papel y el imparable avance del soporte digital

J. R. MARCOS / I. SEISDEDOS - Madrid - 01/03/2009

Un enviado del futuro ha puesto la galaxia Gutenberg patas arriba. El libro electrónico es el tema de conversación definitivo -con permiso de la crisis- en el mundo editorial de 2009. Están los apocalípticos -que niegan la revolución digital y proclaman la insuperable mística del libro-, los integrados -al día del último ingenio- y los despistados -la mayoría-. Dos años después de la aparición del Kindle, el e-book de Amazon, ha vendido medio millón de unidades y se ha convertido en el símbolo de esa revolución. La cara visible de un giro copernicano lleno de malentendidos y preguntas.

- ¿Por qué se ve como una amenaza? Básicamente, por ser lo que más se parece a un libro después del propio libro. Pese a lo que podría dar a entender la terminología cibernética, la pantalla de un libro electrónico tiene más en común con una página de papel que con el monitor de un ordenador. Empezando por la llamada tinta electrónica. Permite que el texto no parpadee y que los píxeles, enemigos de la salud ocular, se eliminen de la ecuación. La vista no se cansa porque la pantalla, al contrario que la de una computadora, no está retroiluminada; necesita un foco de luz externo.

Todos destacan dos virtudes en el libro electrónico: su capacidad y su peso. El eReader, de Sony, principal competidor del Kindle, permite almacenar 160 títulos y pesa 260 gramos, menos que un best seller de tapa dura. Además, se puede subrayar, aumentar el cuerpo de la letra y cambiar los márgenes para facilitar la lectura.

- ¿Cómo se repartirá la tarta del futuro? En el antiguo régimen, un escritor percibe una media del 10% del precio de venta de un libro de papel como derechos de autor. En su pariente electrónico, eliminados los gastos de impresión y almacenaje, y reducidos los de distribución, ese porcentaje sube hasta el 40%. En el caso del gigante Amazon, con su poder negociador, cifras oficiosas fijan la cuota para el autor en un exiguo 20%. Eso sí, el precio para aplicar el porcentaje es menor. La edición de bolsillo de Viaje a la Alcarria, de Camilo José Cela, cuesta 8,50 euros. En el portal Leer-e, 4,99. Y eso porque se considera una novedad digital: El proceso, de Kafka, cuesta 2,16 euros.

Para liar aún más el asunto, la aparición de Kindle2, a la venta esta semana en EE UU, ha añadido otro fente a la batalla. Puede leer textos en voz alta, lo que ha provocado un nuevo litigio: los derechos de audio han de pagarse aparte, cosa que el dispositivo de Amazon no hace.

- ¿Nos desharemos de los intermediarios? No. Como apunta Ignacio Latasa, director de Leer-e, "las editoriales tradicionales son un sello de calidad y ellas son las que tendrán que hacerse cargo del libro electrónico". El portal de Latasa ha sido elegido por Carmen Balcells para distribuir online algunos títulos de escritores representados por su agencia. Al margen de los sellos tradicionales. Latasa lo explica porque tantearon "a muchas editoriales y no se decidieron".

Balcells ya ha colgado títulos de García Márquez, Vargas Llosa, Delibes y Marsé. A final de año serán 100 obras de 50 escritores. Javier Martín, gerente de la agencia, recuerda que los derechos digitales se negocian aparte de los de la edición en papel. ¿Cómo ven esta iniciativa los editores tradicionales de esos autores? Juan González, del grupo Santillana, que publica a Vargas Llosa en Alfaguara, matiza: "Por ahora esas ediciones digitales se limitan a títulos muy concretos, que no suelen ser los más importantes. Como nosotros, los agentes todavía viven del papel. Serían unos insensatos si actuaran al margen de sellos que les pagan anticipos enormes. Nuestra intención es no separar los derechos digitales de los del papel".

- ¿Y qué hay de las librerías? Algunas se reciclarán. Ya hay tiendas que venden códigos de descarga de algunos títulos, cupones con una clave para bajar en Internet los libros. En ese caso, el porcentaje de derechos de autor desciende al 25%. Otros, entre tanto, siguen optando por confiar en "un lector que todavía conserva el placer de encontrar libros". Como Antonio Ramírez, de la librería La Central, de Barcelona y Madrid. "No podemos competir en una estructura que nos excluye. El libro digital lo dominan megacorporaciones. Tenemos que apostar por los que todavía dan valor al soporte más allá del texto. Aún nos quedan dos generaciones de compradores de libros".

- ¿Está preparada la industria española? "Es una herramienta fantástica y si no le prestamos la atención que merece nos equivocaremos", opina el escritor Juan José Millás. "Parece mentira que nadie se preocupe por esto. Yo le pregunté a mi agente sobre el tema y me dijo que no sabía nada. Mal hecho. Es un cambio tan grave como aquel al que se enfrentaron las fábricas de hielo con la llegada de los frigoríficos". La situación del libro digital en España es una pescadilla que se muerde la cola: se venden pocos dispositivos de descarga porque hay pocos contenidos para descargar. Y viceversa. Leer-e tiene 750 títulos. En EE UU, Amazon ha puesto al alcance de su Kindle2, segunda versión del cacharro, 230.000. Además está el precio de los dispositivos, de 400 a 700 euros. Todos coinciden en que el boom llegará cuando se acerque a los 100.

- ¿Se piratearán las novelas? Parece inevitable establecer paralelismos entre el sector editorial y la maltrecha industria musical. Desde luego, hay enseñanzas que aprender de la debacle ajena. La piratería no parece que se vaya a extender como el contagio planetario que tocó en suerte a la música o el cine; las barreras idiomáticas son importantes esta vez. El sector del libro se defiende de momento echando mano de un guirigay de formatos y de sistemas de DRM, similares protecciones anticopia a las que iTunes, plataforma musical de Apple, ha acabado por eliminar ante el avance de la tecnología. Para Javier Martín lo difícil es copiar el formato exacto: "Ya hay miles de libros en la Red. Sobre todo en América Latina, donde se escanea y se cuelga casi todo. Pero no es igual un PDF que un archivo específico de e-book".

- ¿Cuándo será historia el papel? Nunca. En eso coinciden todos los expertos. La pregunta parece ser más bien cuándo la nueva tecnología superará en ventas al viejo libro. En el extremo del triunfalismo cibernético se sitúa Juan González de la Cámara, fundador de Grammata, empresa granadina que comercializa Papyre ("el único libro electrónico español", del que se han vendido "4.500 unidades") considera que en 10 años el 95% de lo que leamos será digital. "Soy capaz de apostarme una cena con quien opine otra cosa". Sin ir tan lejos, en la última feria de Francfort se hizo pública una encuesta entre mil profesionales del sector con una conclusión: en 2018, los libros electrónicos superarán en volumen de negocio a los editados en papel.

Según José Antonio Millán, autor del informe La lectura en España, uno y otro serán complementarios: "El papel desaparecerá en manuales de instrucciones y guías de viaje". ¿Y los libros de texto? Millán espera que no: "Hay estudios sobre psicología cognitiva que demuestran que los conocimientos se asimilan mejor en hoja". Incluso en estos tiempos, alguna victoria le queda al viejo y algo derrotado papel.

Los afectados por la quiebra de Lehman Brothers piden soluciones - El País, es - link (aqui)

Inversores afectados por la quiebra de Lehman Brothers- EFE

EL PAÍS - Madrid - 01/03/2009

La plataforma de afectados por los productos financieros de Lehman Brothers concentró ayer en Madrid a más de 250 personas, que criticaron la "inacción" de los organismos supervisores, de la Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV) y del Banco de España.

Los manifestantes reclamaron sus inversiones durante la protesta y acusaron a las 13 entidades financieras "implicadas" en la venta de productos de la compañía estadounidense de "cerrarse al diálogo". Volverán a manifestarse el 28 de marzo.

Vida secreta de las princesas del harén - El País, es - link (aqui)

La princesa Haya de Dubai (en el centro)- AFP


Unas pocas brillan como primeras damas, pero la mayoría de las esposas de gobernantes del Golfo vive en la oscuridad feudal. Ésta es su historia

M. ANTONIA SÁNCHEZ-VALLEJO - Madrid - 01/03/2009

Compartir el marido con otras esposas no es óbice para ser primera dama, al menos en las pequeñas monarquías del Golfo. Mujeres como la jequesa Mozah de Qatar o la princesa Haya de Dubai atraviesan el espejo del harén como caras visibles de los emiratos donde sus esposos reinan y gobiernan. Al estilo de las first ladies occidentales, se prodigan en público, marcan estilo y se reúnen entre ellas.

Es el club de las primeras damas del Golfo, un fenómeno llamativo si se contempla desde el conservadurismo feudal de la región, y en el que algunos quieren ver un gesto de apertura y otros más una cuestión de estilismo, como si las royals locales no pudieran sustraerse al magnetismo de la glamurosa Rania de Jordania.

Pero al lado de Mozah o Haya, enésimas esposas de los gobernantes de Qatar o Dubai -se desconoce el número exacto de coesposas de cada uno de ellos-, hay otras primeras damas que se pliegan a la tradición de la zona: la del ostracismo de la vida pública, que las condena a no tener derecho a la existencia. El perfil velado de la jequesa Sabika bint Ibrahim de Bahrein o la invisibilidad de la jequesa Fatima bint Mubarak, viuda del emir de Abu Dabi, son dos ejemplos del lado oscuro.

Pese a que la última ostenta el título oficial de Madre de la Nación, nadie logra ponerle cara: está prohibido fotografiarla o filmarla, y no tiene biografía oficial. No se sabe dónde nació, qué edad tiene o cuántos hijos dio al emir. Sólo consta una cosa: que, a pesar de no ser la reina madre -el actual gobernante de Abu Dabi, Khalifa Bin Zayed al Nahyan, es hijo de otra de las coesposas de su marido-, su ascendiente sobre el país supera con creces el del aquél.


Las primeras damas de Siria, Qatar, Turquía y Jordania- REUTERS

Una cortesana de origen extranjero que frecuenta el palacio desgrana la escasa información existente sobre la jequesa Fatima amparada en un obligado anonimato. "No fue la primera esposa del emir, pero sí la favorita. Éste se prendó de ella cuando la descubrió, durante un viaje por el país, en una tribu del desierto. Tenía 13 años y era analfabeta. La jequesa aprendió a leer y escribir una vez casada. Desde entonces respalda iniciativas educativas. Y el hecho de haber tenido que compartir a su marido con otras mujeres le hace ver el harén con desagrado: no le gusta que sus hijos tengan varias mujeres", confiesa esta residente en Abu Dabi. Imposible contrastar la información: hablar de la jequesa es tabú.

En el amplio trecho que va de la abaya (túnica negra tradicional) a los modelos de Versace que luce en sus apariciones públicas en Occidente la jequesa Mozah, estas mujeres salvan también el abismo que media entre las tribus del desierto y la galaxia global. Si la jequesa de Abu Dabi no tiene rostro, Mozah -edad indefinida, licenciada en Sociología, notorio planchado facial- y Haya -35 años, amazona olímpica, formación oxoniense- disponen sin embargo de página web, o como quiera llamarse el incensario virtual que da cuenta de sus múltiples actividades sociales.

Mozah, la única mujer pública del jeque Hamad Bin Khalifa al Thani, es enviada especial de la Unesco para la Educación Básica y Superior y, desde 2005, miembro del Grupo de Alto Nivel de la Alianza de Civilizaciones. Pero su fuerte es el ámbito educativo. En 2003 impulsó la constitución de un fondo internacional para la educación superior en Irak, y en su país amadrina la Ciudad de la Educación, un megacampus situado a las afueras de Doha con facultades de las mejores universidades estadounidenses, como Carnegie Mellon o Georgetown. La jequesa ha recibido doctorados honoris causa de todas ellas. Y la revista Forbes la incluyó en 2007 en la lista de las 100 mujeres más influyentes del mundo.

El matrimonio del jeque Mohamed Bin Rashid al Maktoum con la hermanastra del rey Abdalá de Jordania, Haya, ha hecho ganar peso político a Dubai, y multiplicado el atractivo del emirato. Haya, 25 años menor que su esposo, es la madre de su decimonoveno hijo. Embajadora de buena voluntad del Programa Mundial de Alimentos de la ONU y presidenta de la Federación Hípica Internacional, Haya, que en su juventud frecuentó los hipódromos españoles, es un valor añadido por su proximidad al reino hachemí.

"Todas estas primeras damas constituyen una importante baza a la hora de vender el Golfo a los inversores extranjeros, pero no es sólo una cuestión cosmética. Y aunque la first lady de Qatar sea, con diferencia, la más exhibicionista, por así decirlo; la más aficionada a las cámaras, tras esta proyección mediática, inédita en la región, está una realidad inapelable, la de que estos países están acortando la brecha de género", dice Mohamed Youssef, consultor internacional con base en Abu Dabi.

Así, entre los vectores de negocio de los pequeños Estados del Golfo no sólo figuran el petróleo o los rascacielos imposibles, también el glamour. Es ahí donde entran en juego estas mujeres, auténticas imágenes de marca a la hora de atraer inversiones, cosmopolitismo y eventos sociales. O sea, negocio.

Aunque la imagen, a veces, no lo es todo. En noviembre pasado, el hotel Emirates Palace de Abu Dabi, un siete estrellas colosal, acogió la segunda cumbre de la Organización de Mujeres Árabes bajo el patrocinio de la jequesa Fatima bint Mubarak. Entre cenas de gala y besamanos sólo para mujeres -los hombres fueron recluidos en edificios aparte-, las sesiones de trabajo eran retransmitidas por circuito cerrado de televisión. A la cita acudió lo más granado del papel cuché oriental: la esposa de Mohamed VI de Marruecos, la siria Asma al Assad y la reina de Jordania, entre otras. Rania, falda lápiz, stilettos y delgadez de astilla, reinaba cual top model entre un enjambre de fotógrafos y cámaras... hasta que llegó la jequesa Fatima. Fundido en negro. Plano fijo castigado de cara a la pared. La jequesa, menuda, cetrina, vestida de negro de la cabeza a los pies y luciendo un bocado de cuero repujado sobre la mandíbula -un signo de sumisión en algunas tribus del desierto-, logró eclipsar a la reina de corazones.