segunda-feira, 4 de maio de 2009

The One You Love by Glenn Frey with lyrics

Linda Ronstadt - Desperado

The Eagles-One of these nights

Lara Fabian - Love by Grace (Legendado em Português)

Chuck Berry - Johnny B. Goode live

I Just Don't Know What To Do With Myself - The White Stripes

Bar é fotografia - Boris Babikov


Boris Babikov

Untitled

Bar é poesia - Tereza Vignoli





Quantas vezes



(Tereza Vignoli)





quantas vezes já tive que

arrancar amores do peito?




coração mutilado

mordido de adeuses

Bar é fotografia - Igor Amelkovich


Igor Amelkovich

Sunset dreams # 9

Bar é poesia - Líria Porto



Líria Porto





amore


(Líria Porto)




quando voltares

vou transbordar

chorar de alegria

sangrar o açude

matar tua sede

e a minha

Comercial antigo - Sempre Livre com Marilia Pera

Charge do dia


Myrris - A Crítica - Manaus, AM

Silverstone back in Formula One frame as Donington doubts grow - The Times, uk - link (aqui)


May 4, 2009

Bernie Ecclestone could be reneging on the crucial commercial contract he wants Formula One teams to sign if he ditches the British Grand Prix amid fears that Donington Park is not going to be ready to hold the nation’s showpiece race.

Silverstone, the traditional home of the race, is on standby to stage it again in 2010 should Donington fall victim to its financial problems, and has £40 million of financing ready for release. But Ecclestone, chief executive of FOM, the company that controls Formula One’s finances, insists that no Donington means no British Grand Prix.

However, it emerged last night that a British race on the Formula One calendar is a key component of the new commercial contract, known as the Concord Agreement, which Ecclestone wants the teams to sign. One team principal, who refused to be named, said that the contract demands specifically that five key races are protected as part of Formula One’s heritage: in Britain, France, Italy, Belgium and Germany.

The “traditional” races are also on a protected list in the Formula One constitution held by the FIA, the world governing body of motor sport. With France already falling off the calendar, though, there seems little commitment to preserving the history of a sport focused increasingly on making profits for its commercial overlords. Six of the ten present grand-prix teams are based within an hour’s drive of Silverstone, while two of the three new teams expected on the grid next season — Prodrive and Lola — are British.

Damon Hill, the 1996 Formula One world champion, who is chairman of the British Racing Drivers’ Club, which owns Silverstone, wants Ecclestone to negotiate a sensible way out to allow a race to go ahead in 2010.

“Britain is a key protected race,” he said. “The first grand prix of the modern era was held at Silverstone and this country has been loyal to the championship throughout.

“Now we have new countries wanting to stage grands prix and governments willing to put up the money for them. But there is no government money for a British Grand Prix and Bernie needs to recognise this. It will not happen.

“Everybody was sceptical about Donington from the start, yet we have funds here to improve our circuit and we are improving all the time. But we have to do it with our own means and with our own money. The FIA should also act responsibly for the health and wellbeing of the sport. Britain is a protected race and they should look after it.”

Silverstone has just spent £7 million on circuit upgrades to accommodate MotoGP, Formula One’s motorcycling equivalent, which has deserted Donington. But financing, arranged before Ecclestone’s decision, is available for more rebuilding.

Ecclestone handed Donington a ten-year contract to hold the British Grand Prix on the eve of last year’s race at Silverstone, again arguing that Formula One’s traditional home in this country was not up to standard and that Donington Ventures Ltd, which had taken over the running of the circuit, was offering a Utopian racing future based on a £100 million redevelopment plan. If there were doubts at the start that Donington could work a miracle in two years, the recession appears to have holed the scheme below the waterline.

That was underlined last month, when it was discovered that Donington Ventures was being pursued in court for unpaid rent of almost £2.5 million and forfeiture of the lease by Wheatcroft and Son, the landowner.

Simon Gillett, the chief executive of Donington Ventures, says that the project is on schedule and will be ready by next summer, but where the £100 million financing will come from remains a mystery. Local planners getting nervous and a meeting of North West Leicestershire District Council tomorrow could pull the plug on planning consent.

Geoff Hoon, the Transport Secretary, who is the MP for Ashfield, a Nottinghamshire constituency just across the M1 from Donington, is desperate for the race to go ahead, while Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, has also intervened.

But it is clear there will be no government money forthcoming — despite Ecclestone’s pleas — and time is running out.

The 2010 British Grand Prix is only 14 months away, should Ecclestone decide on a plum July date. Donington is clearly not ready, finance is still being sought and Donington Ventures has to negotiate its way out of the wrangle with the Wheatcrofts.

If none of those issues can be resolved, Ecclestone will have to face the British contingent in the paddock with reasons why there should not be a British Grand Prix.

The flaw in the business model is that CVC / BE should really pay the track owners not be paid by them which is why BE likes governments to fund them instead as he can raise the prices way above what the race gate money would normally allow. The tracks keep on signing the contracts though...

paul j. weighell, purley, uk

Since when was f1 about the public at venues? F1 is the money TV and promotors pay to Bernie and friends. After that the promotors have to worry about the crowds, hence Bernie only concerned with how the teams, sponsors and their guests and media get into and out of the track.

pat, London,

Long live Monza its a great circuit. Having been to many GP's around the world (sitting in the Grandstands), Silverstone is hard to beat. The food isn't bad (Monza - poor choice & Sepang - awful), the toilets are actually the best and its a proper track. Bernie needs to get out and sit with the fans

Tom, Manila, Philippines

Scandal, spin and cover-up: Secret Whitehall - The Independent, uk - link (aqui)

Crowded house: a cabinet meeting at No. 10

The ‘Smeargate’ affair is merely a footnote in its long history of scandal, spin and cover-up. The most famous street in British politics has always had a dark side, says Colin Brown

Monday, 4 May 2009

It'll be small consolation to Gordon Brown, but the secrecy, smears and sleaze which have dogged his government in recent months have been part of the fabric of Whitehall for five centuries. Damian McBride is now a pariah figure at Westminster. But his attempts at the black arts were mild compared to the treachery of the man who gave his name to Downing Street.

Sir George Downing, who returned to England from America to fight on the side of the Parliamentarians in the English Civil War, was Oliver Cromwell's chief spy. When Cromwell died, Downing brazenly changed sides to support the restoration of the Monarchy in 1660; he convinced Charles II of his change of heart after helping to arrest three former allies, including his mentor Colonel John Okey, who had been hunted down for signing Charles I's death warrant. As a result of his actions, they were hung, drawn and quartered as traitors - and Downing's reward was a knighthood and land to build some houses, resulting in the street where successive prime ministers have had their official residence since 1735.

Last summer, Gordon Brown hosted the summer party for the lobby journalists at Number 10 Downing Street. As we walked along the corridor from the Cabinet Room to that famous front door, I spoke to him about covering Sir George Downing in my book, which explores the history of Whitehall. "I don't know much about him," admitted Brown. That was not unusual. I found that few of the ministers who work in the street now synonymous with the civil service and the centre of power know much about the history of the buildings, the people who once occupied them - or the tales of duplicity and spin which outdo any contemporary scandal.



Behind the famous black door, questions are still being asked: is Number 10 fit for purpose?

The secret passages of Henry VIII's 'Palace of White Hall'

A secret entrance to 10 Downing Street lies behind the bland façade of the Cabinet Office at 70 Whitehall. It runs along Cockpit Passage which was used by the youthful Henry VIII to reach the indoor tennis courts where he sweated at the game of real tennis, while his courtiers, including Anne Boleyn, watched from galleries above. Had Scotland Yard commander Bob Quick known it was there, such a clandestine route might have saved him last month from revealing to photographers the secret papers he was carrying as he stepped inside the front door of Number 10.

The Tudor Cockpit Passage was part of Henry's royal palace which covered 23 acres Whitehall to rival the largest royal palaces in Europe. The palace was split into two distinct halves. The king's private living quarters were on the east side of King Street, the main thoroughfare between Westminster and Charing Cross, and Henry's entertainment and sports complex was on the west side by the deer park.

As a young man, Henry enjoyed jousting in the yard now covered by Horse Guards Parade and he was also a keen tennis player - the courts were laid out in a church-like building where the Cabinet Office stands today.

To cross the road to his sports complex, without having to meet the public, Henry constructed a gateway - the Holbein Gate - which carried his long privy gallery almost from the riverside to tennis courts at the north end of the Cabinet Office where it joins the Scotland Office, in Dover House. A second gateway, known as the King Street gate, was built roughly at the corner of Downing Street and Whitehall. Between the two great gateways, which presented an impressive processional route to Westminster Abbey, the Tudor passage ran in the direction of Downing Street to Henry's cockpit.

Viewing galleries lay off Cockpit Passage where his courtiers would wager vast sums on the outcome of his matches. "It was the prettiest thing in the world to see him play, his fair skin glowing through a shirt of finest texture," the Venetian Ambassador enthusiastically reported home. "He plays at tennis most dextrously."

After the east side of Whitehall palace was burned down in 1698, the buildings were gradually used for private houses or replaced, but the Tudor passage Henry and his courtiers had known remained intact. Today, the distinctive Tudor bricks and the fireplace where young Henry may have warmed himself, are passed each day by civil servants, hurrying between the two inner parts of the Cabinet Office.

At the end of the Cockpit Passage lies another flight of stairs down to a lower level and in the corner, there is a 'secret' doorway. Today it resembles a pod from Star Wars, and opens with a security pin code. It leads to a passage that emerges by the Prime Minister's den, right inside Number 10. This route is used almost every day by Sir Gus O'Donnell, the Cabinet Secretary, to see the PM. It has been used by a variety of figures in recent years who want to visit the prime minister without being seen by the cameramen who are permanently camped outside the front door.

Those who have used it include Sinn Fein leaders Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness, during delicate negotiations in the Northern Ireland peace process with Tony Blair and more recently Alastair Campbell, Tony Blair's former spin doctor, when he was called back to Downing Street to advise Gordon Brown. Bob Quick must now wonder why nobody told him he could use it to dodge the press.




The architect of the Foreign Office, George Gilbert Scott, had won a competition in the mid-19th century for a Gothic design, but Prime Minister Lord Palmerston rejected his drawings as 'the barbarism of the Dark Ages', and a subsequent plan for a Byzantine building as 'a regular mongrel affair'

Fine Wines and high living behind closed doors: Cardinal Wolsey's palace

If Jacqui Smith outraged public opinion over her claims for expenses for a second home in Westminster, she could take lessons from Cardinal Wolsey, Henry VIII's Lord Chancellor. He used income from his high office in the state and the Church to enrich his lifestyle and pay for his ecclesiastical palace, York Place, where he lived by the Thames (it was later seized in 1529 by Henry VIII and became the royal Palace of White Hall). It now lies beneath the monstrous post-war Ministry of Defence building, but there are relics of the Tudor palace behind the bland facades of Whitehall.

Wolsey was the Peter Mandelson of his day. He was the power behind the throne, the fixer and the sage, whose cunning and statecraft Henry VIII relied on for years. Wolsey's home, York Place, was on King Street, the main thoroughfare between Westminster and Charing Cross, where he frequently entertained Henry and his retinue of lusty young male friends to banquets, including one used by Shakespeare as the setting for the play in which Anne Boleyn first catches the king's eye.

To run the mansion, Wolsey had a small army of 500 servants in uniforms of crimson to match his status as a cardinal. Even his head cook wore a chain of solid gold. Each day, Wolsey rode the half mile to Westminster to preside over the courts at the head of an impressive procession. Wolsey was a master showman, who understood the importance of public opinion. He rode on a humble mule as a mark of his piety, but it was covered in a coat of scarlet and its stirrups were gilded.

Astonishingly, the wine cellar from which his servants carried pitchers of drink to Wolsey's banqueting tables has survived. It was threatened with demolition when the construction of the MOD building, after the Second World War, revealed the foundations of Wolsey's former mansion. However, there was a public outcry to save it, and the entire crypt, slimmed down to 800 tons, was painstakingly lowered on screw jacks into the basement of the MOD building, where it is used for VIP defence receptions.

Despite all his guile, Wolsey's 'filed tongue' failed him in 1527 when the 'great matter' of the king's divorce exploded into the court of King Henry VIII.

As the Pope's representative in England, Henry expected Wolsey to deliver a divorce from Katherine of Aragon so that he could marry Anne Boleyn. But Wolsey's efforts proved in vain. Anne had old scores to settle against Wolsey, and followed the saying frequently heard today around Westminster: don't get mad, get even. She proved Wolsey's nemesis.

Wolsey's loyal gentleman-usher and biographer, George Cavendish, described how thousands turned out to enjoy the spectacle of the great man being forced out after being stripped of his office in 1529.

Thinking he would be beheaded, they took to boats on the Thames to see Wolsey make his final exit by barge from the Thames-side wharf of his palace, now buried under the east wall of the MOD in Whitehall. "At the taking of his barge, there were no less than a thousand boats full of men and women of the City of London, waffeting up and down the Thames, expecting my lord's departing supposing that he should have gone directly from thence to the Tower. Thereat they rejoiced..."

Over 450 years later, Margaret Thatcher made her own tearful exit from Downing Street, barely 200 yards from where Wolsey boarded his gilded barge. In words that echo down the centuries, Cavendish railed against the perfidy of public opinion: "O wavering and new fangled multitude! Is it not a wonder to consider the inconstant mutability of this uncertain world!"

Cavendish's words on Wolsey's fate and the others, including on two occasions Peter Mandelson, who have fallen from high office, prove the wisdom of Enoch Powell's law, that all political careers end in tears.

Royal spin and bloody error at the Banqueting House

Still in the first flush of Labour's election victory in 1997, Tony Blair had a royal duty to perform: a toast to Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip on their Golden Wedding anniversary.

Three months earlier, on Sunday 31 August, the youthful Prime Minister had spoken movingly about the death of their daughter-in-law, Diana, Princess of Wales, describing her as the 'People's Princess'. It was a phrase that appeared to bear the imprint of former Daily Mirror journalist Alastair Campbell, the Prime Minister's head of communications and chief 'spin doctor', although he denied it, but Blair was judged to have 'spoken for the nation'. England, for a nation that prided itself on its stiff upper lip, was in the grip of an extraordinary emotional outpouring of grief for the pop-star princess who had been, by popular opinion, wronged by the Royal Family. It resulted in a dangerous public backlash against the House of Windsor. Campbell's Downing Street spin machine had found the Palace hopelessly outdated and wooden in its response to Diana's death, and took on the role of saving the Royal Family from itself by populist touches, such as flying the flag of Buckingham Palace at half-mast, to show to the public it 'cared'. Blair's support for the monarchy at the Banqueting House was part of the 'fightback' strategy.

In a soundbite that was designed to catch the headlines the next day, Blair told the Queen: "I am proud as proud can be to be your Prime Minister today offering this tribute on behalf of the country. You are our Queen. We respect and cherish you. You are, simply, the Best of British.'

Here was a Labour prime minister at the flood of his popularity defending the House of Windsor from the murmurings of the people. And yet, only a Prime Minister with a view of history that started on his own election day could have ignored the historical importance of the venue - Inigo Jones's brilliant Palladian building, the Banqueting House in Whitehall - for the defence of monarchy as an institution.

Sources at the Palace have confirmed to me that the venue was chosen by Downing Street. "It wasn't us," I was told. For it was outside the windows that lit the Queen's luncheon, on 30 January, 1649, that King Charles I was executed and England's Republic was born.

Cramped, antiquated and unfit for purpose: Behind the Downing St facade

Downing Street has borne witness to most of the momentous events in British history. But behind the famous black door, questions are still being asked: is Number 10 fit for purpose? The facade of the terraced houses that make up Downing Street is the same, but between 1958 and 1963 the 350-year-old rooms inside Number 10 were gutted in a major £1m renovation to stop it falling down.

It is quite unlike the West Wing at the White House or the Kremlin, which were designed as Government headquarters. Some Number 10 insiders told me it was like running a modern government from a National Trust property. Lance Price, a former Number 10 aide, said: "It is an extraordinary anachronism that the British prime minister in the 21st century should work from this building simply out of tradition."

Tony Blair hinted at the limitations of Number 10, shortly before he left office: "The trouble is that Downing Street at the moment is perched a little uneasily between being the formal, state, visible outward expression of Britain and the place where you receive people, and a functioning workplace."

Officials have told me Gordon Brown would have liked to decamp, using Number 10 solely for ceremonial purposes and using an office elsewhere for the business of being Prime Minister. The Cabinet Office on Whitehall - attached to Number 10 by a secret passage - has become more of a department for the Prime Minister. Staff have been moved in from Number 10, forcing others to be 'bumped' along the Whitehall as far as Admiralty Arch.

The Prime Minister has also commandeered Number 12 at the end of Downing Street as a 'war room' run by Liam Byrne, the Cabinet Office minister, Tom Watson, who coordinates the internet campaigns, and key aides who tackle the daily crises of modern government. The impression that it resembles as scene from the TV series, The Thick of It, was increased by the disclosure of e-mails from Damian McBride to Derek Draper suggesting the planting of smear stories against the Tories on a Labour-supporting website, Red Rag. McBride was instantly sacked and disowned by Brown, although he had been trusted by him at the Treasury for years. The recession has ruled out any prospect of any Prime Minister doing away with Number 10 Downing Street as the official residence of the First Lord of Treasury. The most famous front door in the world is here to stay, whether the new incumbent likes it or not.

200 years of sex and scandal at the Scotland Office

The Scotland Office is the prim building that sits squatly between the Cabinet Office and Horse Guards, ignored by the tourists, but it was once the most notorious address in London, when it was the home of Lord and Lady Melbourne, their son, William Lamb, and his impish, 'wild-child' wife, Lady Caroline.

Lady Melbourne had turned Melbourne House into one of the three leading Whig salons in London, to rival those of Georgiana, the Duchess of Devonshire, and Lady Holland, where Fox and Sheridan were regular house guests, and the princes, Frederick, Duke of York, and George, Prince of Wales (later George IV) presided over a royal court in 'opposition' to that of the ailing and sometimes mad king, George III.

In keeping with the liberal attitudes of the Regency aristocracy, Lady Melbourne had climbed the social ladder on her back. Only one of her six children - her first son - was fathered by Lord Melbourne. She had sons by both princes. There were so many children with different fathers they were called 'the children of the mist'. But it was Caroline who brought scandal on Melbourne House. She fell passionately and publicly in love with Lord Byron in 1812 after the publication of his heroic tale Childe Harold's Pilgrimage.

It was a brief, tempestuous affair - on 9 August, tormented by fears of rejection, she sent him a love letter with cuttings of her pubic hairs - but for Caroline, it was the drama of her life. As Byron tried to extricate himself, she made a scene at a ball, and became despised by her Regency set.

Caroline never completely recovered after Byron's death from fever in Greece in 1826, but William went on to be Queen Victoria's first Prime Minister.

The upper floors where the Lambs lived are now offices, but Caro's wild spirit may live on. There is a room with a walk-in wardrobe where she surely had her bed, overlooking St James's Park. A civil servant told me she was working there late at night when she heard a rustling noise like a lady's dress. "It was so loud that I stepped out into the corridor. I thought someone had a lady's dress on and it was rustling but there was no sign of anyone."

John Prescott briefly occupied the basement garden rooms, where the Melbournes had lived when he was Deputy Prime Minister and he was waiting for the completion of his offices running from the Cabinet Office to Admiralty Arch. He conducted Cabinet committee meetings there, and, it is said, first met his diary secretary, Tracey Temple, who was later to become involved in their own kiss-and-tell saga. Photographs of Temple in Prescott's arms, which were published when their affair became public, were taken at a Christmas party in Admiralty House, where he had a grace and favour apartment. In that photo, they were in the doorway to the ground floor dining room where Nelson had an embarrassing dinner with his wife Fanny in November 1800, when he, too, was involved in a scandalous love affair with Lady Emma Hamilton.

Spies and dodgy dossiers at the Foreign Office

A display case in one of the long corridors of the Foreign Office holds an Enigma machine, the device that helped Britain break the Ultra code and keep ahead of the Germans during the Second World War. The Foreign Secretary sits at the centre of Britain's international intelligence web, receiving reports from GCHQ, intelligence agents and ambassadors across the world, but the Prime Minister remains firmly charge of the intelligence services.

The use of intelligence to support Britain's involvement in the invasion of Iraq in 2003, including claims that Downing Street had 'sexed up' the threat of weapons of mass destruction, caused the greatest controversy surrounding intelligence in modern history - and raised questions about the conflict of interests between the Foreign Office and Number 10.

Alastair Campbell, Blair's head of communications, denied 'sexing up' the WMD claims, but had a unit inside the Foreign Office answerable to Number 10 - the Coalition Information Centre (CIC) - that was responsible for producing a dossier by cutting and pasting allegations off the internet. I was one of the journalists who received the so-called 'dodgy dossier' under my hotel door while covering a Blair trip to Washington in the run-up to the war.

Spying is as old as Whitehall itself. Sir Francis Walsingham, Elizabeth I's enterprising spymaster intercepted encrypted letters in 1586 from the Catholic Mary Queen of Scots, imprisoned in Fotheringay Castle, that led Elizabeth reluctantly to sign Mary's death warrant. Walsingham had a good 'decypherer' but he also relied on a double-agent, Gifford, who had acted as the plotters' double agent.

The Secret and Intelligence Service - MI6 - was created as a response to the German espionage threat in 1909 and its first chief was Commander Mansfield Smith-Cumming, a 50-year-old Royal Navy officer who moved into an office in the War Office in Whitehall and rented flat 54 at No 2 Whitehall Court. Cumming became known as 'C' because he always signed memos with his initial in green ink.

MI6 has its headquarters in the flesh-coloured building south of the Thames at Vauxhall Cross, but the 'in-house' intelligence officers - 'spooks' - occupy the top floor of the Foreign Office, and an intelligence desk is manned 24-hours a day to keep the Foreign Secretary informed of developments around the world.

Researching my book, I discovered that the intelligence services have continued to expand. I was unable to gain entrance to the former Admiralty Building on the north side of Horse Guards Parade where I wanted to see the sea maps that Churchill had used when he was twice First Lord of the Admiralty (both in the First World War and the Second) because, I was told, the building is now occupied by intelligence staff attached to the Foreign Office.

The same applied to the adjoining creeper-clad fortress, codenamed HMS St Vincent, built in 1940-41 and described by Churchill as a 'vast monstrosity'. I was told it conceals a secret communications tunnel that runs south, under the QE Centre to Marsham Street and a wartime bunker under the new Home Office, one of the many citadels and tunnels across Whitehall. The main nuclear bunker is under the MOD, known as PINDAR, built in the early 1990s. Rumours abound that the tunnels are linked to the Tube system for evacuation, but they have been denied.

The architect of the Foreign Office, George Gilbert Scott, had won a competition in the mid-19th century for a Gothic design, but Prime Minister Lord Palmerston rejected his drawings as "the barbarism of the Dark Ages", and a subsequent plan for a Byzantine building as "a regular mongrel affair".

Palmerston was famous for 'gunboat' diplomacy and during Blair's period of office, the Downing Street website described Palmerston's foreign policy as 'jingoistic'. But it was echoed by Blair's Chicago speech in 1999 in support of 'liberal interventionism'. One Labour rebel, Andrew MacKinlay, a member of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, which investigated the intelligence blunders, told me: "The Foreign Office has a reputation for being a Rolls-Royce. I think it's more a Ford saloon."

Adapted from 'Whitehall: The Street That Shaped a Nation' by Colin Brown (£17.99), which is published by Simon & Schuster on 5 May. To order a copy for the special price of £16.19 (with free P&P) call Independent Books Direct on 08700 798 897, or visit www.independentbooksdirect.co.uk

Russell Crowe's remarkable rehabilitation - The Guardian, uk - link (aqui)

Russell Crowe in State of Play. Photograph: PR

Peter Bradshaw
The Guardian, Monday 4 May 2009

There's nothing the film business loves more than a comeback, and we could be on the verge of the unlikeliest of all. Not so long ago, Russell Crowe was the man everybody not-so-secretly loathed. His Gladiatorial armour was rusty and his moral musculature had run to flab. He was a monster of ego. This was the man who threw a tantrum and a non-working telephone at a hapless New York hotel receptionist. He'd ranted at a British TV producer for editing out a poem he'd read aloud at an awards ceremony. He suffered the almost historic indignity of Rupert Murdoch personally describing his film A Good Year as "a flop". Then we heard he'd got Sienna Miller fired from the role of Maid Marian in his upcoming version of Robin Hood - because her svelte young form was making Russ look fat and old.

But remember how things looked dire for Maximus Decimus Meridias, when those tigers were sent into the arena? He turned it round. And the same thing could be happening now for Russ. His new thriller, State of Play, has opened here to a mass of upturned thumbs all round the critical colosseum, and cheers rang through London's Leicester Square as Russ cheerfully worked the premiere crowd, posing for mobile-phone pictures.

Everybody loves it and, more crucially, they sort of love Russ, personally, in a way they haven't for years. His young co-star Rachel McAdams might have made him look pudgy and past-it, but Crowe looked like he didn't mind. Helen Mirren made a point of saying that Crowe had saved everyone's bacon by agreeing to step in when Brad Pitt had flounced out, citing a problem with a script. Russell, born-again trouper that he is, had no problem with the script, and didn't even have long to learn it.

Now we are even looking forward to Russell as Robin Hood, cantering through the sun-dappled glen in his lincoln green get-up, quiver of arrows athwart his manly shoulders. The old alpha-male warrior could be set to steal our hearts once more.

Diaghilev's Ballet Russes: a century of sensation - The Guardian, uk - link (aqui)

Tumultuous ... English National Ballet's forthcoming reinterpretation of Schéhérazade. Photograph: George Lewis

It is exactly 100 years since Diaghilev's Ballets Russes stormed the west and changed ballet for ever. Judith Mackrell on how today's choreographers are paying tribute

Judith Mackrell
The Guardian, Monday 4 May 2009

In May 1909, Paris was buzzing with stories about a company of young Russian dancers who had just hit town. There was Ida Rubinstein, parading around with a panther on a lead and drinking champagne out of lilies; there was Anna Pavlova, whose delicate dancing was already legendary; and, finally, there was Vaslav Nijinsky, who became known as the God of the Dance for the miraculous height of his jumps.

They were the leading lights of Serge Diaghilev's company, Ballets Russes - and now, 100 years on, dance companies around the world are marking the centenary of that tumultuous first Paris season. Scottish Ballet is creating a new version of the 1911 piece Petrushka, the Royal and the English National Ballet are presenting programmes of Diaghilev repertory, and London's Sadler's Wells has commissioned four works, inspired by the Ballets Russes. It's an unprecedented act of homage, and fitting for the company that changed ballet from decorative entertainment to an avant-garde art form.

The Ballets Russes lasted just 20 years, disbanding after the death of Diaghilev. But between 1909 and 1929, it staged more than 50 courageous new works. Diaghilev brought together choreographers, composers and painters who were pushing the boundaries; his company became a hotbed of modernist invention. In 1913, The Rite of Spring generated riots at the Théâtre des Champs-Elysées, as audiences reacted to the primitivist ferocity of Nijinksy's choreography and Stravinksy's music. Parade premiered in 1917 as the world's first "cubist ballet", with design by Picasso, music by Erik Satie, libretto by Jean Cocteau and choreography by Léonid Massine.

For Alistair Spalding, artistic director of Sadler's Wells, Diaghilev's achievements still dwarf anything today: "You look at photos of all those great [people] he gathered together, and there is such an aura about them. These days, if you approach any major artist about a project, they'll say, 'OK, I could do that in about 2013.' Back then, the world was so much smaller. But Diaghilev was still the one who came along and made the magic."

Diaghilev had ambition and willpower in spades. By 1909, at just 36, he had studied law and music, been assistant director of the Imperial Theatres in St Petersburg, co-founded and edited the seminal art magazine Miriskusstva (World of Art), and presented three showcases of Russian painting, opera and music in Paris. With a commercial nous ahead of his time, he knew Russian culture was fantastically marketable. Its combination of Slavic melancholy, Asiatic exoticism and radicalism appeared to the novelty-hungry west as savage, poetic and enthrallingly new.

At the start of the 20th century, ballet was in decline. In Russia, however, it was undergoing a renaissance, with a new generation of dancers and choreographers galvanised by the revolutionary energies fermenting in the country's politics and art. It was this generation that Diaghilev took to Paris in 1909, and then to Europe and America. The company's repertory was constantly changing. Single-act ballets replaced full-length spectacles, every work an experiment in subject matter and style.

Michel Fokine's Firebird, for instance, was based on Russian folk stories. Its ballerina was no meek maiden, waiting to fall in love, but an adversarial heroine. The villains danced with a nightmarish, churning power, while Stravinsky's music - his first dance score - was of a shockingly fractured modernity. Such music had never been heard at the ballet. Determined to make "total" dance theatre, Diaghilev took his pick from concert composers such as Ravel, Debussy and Prokofiev. He also chose leading painters to create his designs, working with Picasso, Matisse, Braque, Miró and De Chirico.

These collaborations had a wider impact. In 1910, Léon Bakst's designs for Schéhérazade caused a style revolution in Paris. Drawing rooms were furnished with exotic rugs, and the couturier Poiret brought out a collection of sinuously draped evening dresses. In 1917, Parade drew admiring comments from writers such as Guillaume Apollinaire, who coined the term sur-réalisme. Between 1918 and 1920, the Ballets Russes became a cult in London, reviewed by the likes of TS Eliot.

Many of the ballets have not survived intact: they were created before standardised dance notation. But they have acquired a potent afterlife: the music for Rite has been used frequently by choreographers. And Spalding has invited the choreographers in his tribute programme, called In the Spirit of Diaghilev and opening in the autumn, to work around some element or association connected with the company. Russell Maliphant will be working with Nijinsky's choreographic drawings; Wayne McGregor will explore the events surrounding the historic debut of 1909; Sidi Larbi Cherkaoui will use Debussy's music for L'Après-Midi d'un Faune, and Javier de Frutos will create a work to Ravel's La Valse.

De Frutos has already choreographed four versions of The Rite of Spring, and two of Les Noces (another Stravinsky score for Diaghilev). "Every time I research a new work, even if it's nothing to do with Diaghilev," he says, "I find that something associated with him comes up." He sees Diaghilev as the greatest role model: "He would have sold his soul to create new work for the company. He had the charisma to make anyone do anything for him, and he wasn't bothered by political correctness. Those were the glory days when people would sleep with you to get a job. And some of the best slept with Diaghilev".

Les Sylphides, Sensorium and The Firebird are in rep at the Royal Opera House, London WC1, until 20 May (020-7304 4000). The English National Ballet's Ballets Russes programme is at Sadler's Wells, London EC1, 16-20 June (0844 412 4300). In The Spirit of Diaghilev is at Sadler's Wells from 13 October.

After Chrysler, Fiat plans merger with Opel to create car industry giant - The Guardian, uk - link (aqui)

Fiat has the German car maker Opel in its sights to create a giant European carmaker Photograph: Thomas Kienzle/AP

Agencies
guardian.co.uk, Monday 4 May 2009 01.54 BST

The Italian carmaker Fiat is seeking to merge its car division with General Motors Europe and ailing US car firm Chrysler to create an automotive giant second only to Japan's Toyota in terms of production.

Fiat's chief executive, Sergio Marchionne, will meet German government ministers today to discuss a bid for the German car maker Opel, part of GM Europe.

If the talks go to plan, Fiat would list shares in the combined company this summer. Marchionne described the plan as "an incredibly simple solution to a very thorny problem".

He told the Financial Times: "From an engineering and industrial point of view, this is a marriage made in heaven."

The plan comes the week after Fiat signed an agreement with Chrysler to take an initial 20% stake in the US carmaker. Fiat's board met yesterday to review the Chrysler deal and back Marchionne in weighing a potential merger of Fiat's car division, including the Chrysler interest, with GM Europe into a new company.

"As part of this process, the group would evaluate several corporate structures, including the potential spin-off of Fiat Group Automobiles and the subsequent listing of a new company which combines those activities with those of General Motors Europe," the company said in a statement. Fiat said the the combined company would have an annual revenue of €80bn (£71bn).

Fiat's chairman, Luca Cordero di Montezemolo, told the Corriere della Sera that a Fiat takeover of Opel "would be for us an extraordinary opportunity; they would be our ideal partners; a very strong group would be created.".

But the German economy minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg said yesterday that Fiat – or any investor – had to present a solid long-term strategy to keep Opel plants open to obtain German government support.

Marchionne has said Fiat needed a partner to reach an output level of 5.5m to 6m units a year, the scale he believes necessary to survive the car industry crisis.

Opel staff, union leaders and some political leaders have reacted with reservations to Fiat. Klaus Franz, works council head of Opel and a supervisory board member, has said parties other than Fiat and Magna were interested in Opel.

Opel, hit by a slump in demand due to the global downturn, has four plants in Germany and employs about 25,000 workers. Thousands more jobs at suppliers are at stake.

All the president's emails: Arlen Specter, Anita Dunn, Joe Biden - The Guardian, uk - link (aqui)


In a unique experiment in democratic transparency, Barack Obama - a BlackBerry owner, and the first American president to use email while in office - has agreed to copy G2 in on his otherwise highly confidential electronic communications. Each week, we present a selection from recent days:

09.57 Mon, 4 May

To: Arlen Specter [arlen.specter@senate.gov]
Subject: welcome aboard

Just wanted to drop you a line to welcome you personally to the Democratic party, and to say how much I appreciate this courageous act of naked self-preservation. Not everyone would have the nerve to abandon an affiliation of some 30 years standing in order to avoid a tough primary race. I've long admired your independent spirit, but you won't be needing it any more. Good Democrats toe the line. I'll drop by the debriefing if I get a chance - in the meantime I'm getting some bumper stickers and stuff sent over to your office. Update your website, and cover your mouth when you cough. Barack.

To: Anita Dunn, acting White House communications director [anita.dunn@whitehouse.gov]
Subject: welcome aboard

Thanks Anita. It's great of you to help out while we look for someone permanent. And relax, the job isn't as hard as it looks. Just don't let Biden send any emails unless someone reads them first, and make sure Rahm doesn't punch anyone important. Our nation is facing unprecedented economic challenges and a possible pandemic, but I think you'll find that most of the questions will be about the dog. Have you got enough tissues in your office, btw? Let me know if you need more. BHO

To: VPOTUS [joe.biden@whitehouse.gov]
Subject: Re: taking the subway

Joe, let me be clear about this: I'm not upset because you said that you would advise your family to stay off public transportation - that's a personal issue. I'm more worried about what you were doing on Today in the first place. I'm eating my cornflakes, watching TV, and suddenly there you are, talking to Matt Lauer about swine flu. How many times have we discussed this? From now on if you get an invitation to appear on TV, you will ask Anita if it's OK, and Anita will say no. Got it? Barack

To: Dr@HealthAnswers.com

I recently got back from a trip to Mexico. Although the risk of infection was probably minimal (I didn't fly commercial, put it that way), all these news stories have made me somewhat nervous, especially after what the VP said on Today the other morning. Also, since I got back from Mexico I've been feeling sort of, not ill exactly, but kind of washed out. My doctors say I'm fine - they're unanimous on that, in fact - and that it's probably just stress (my job is v stressful). Should I be worried? Mr O.

To: All Senior White House Staff
Subject: Day 103, and counting

It's quarter past the hour, people. Time to wash our hands.

Les répercussions politiques et financières du divorce de M. Berlusconi - Le Monde, fr - link (aqui)

AP/SUSAN WALSH - Après trente ans de vie commune, Veronica Lario veut partir.

LE MONDE | 04.05.09 | 08h56 • Mis à jour le 04.05.09 | 10h07

Rome, correspondant

Celle-ci était de trop : jeune, blonde, élancée, étudiante et présentatrice de télévision à ses heures, Noemi Letizia a eu raison du couple formé par Silvio et Veronica Berlusconi depuis trente ans. Apprenant la présence de son mari, dimanche 26 avril au soir, à une fête d'anniversaire pour la jeune fille dans la banlieue de Naples, Veronica a décidé de demander le divorce après dix-neuf ans de mariage. "Une affaire personnelle douloureuse", a commenté, dimanche 3 mai, le chef du gouvernement italien.

Cette nuit-là, Noemi fêtait ses 18 ans. Silvio Berlusconi lui a offert un collier : "Je suis trop contente, a déclaré un peu plus tard la jeune fille. Un cadeau plus beau encore ? “Papounet” ne pouvait pas me le faire." "Papounet" ? C'est ainsi que Noemi Letizia appelle Silvio Berlusconi.

En découvrant le récit de cette soirée mardi 28 avril dans le quotidien La Repubblica, Veronica Berlusconi, pourtant habituée aux infidélités de son époux, a décidé de consulter un avocat. Elle avait déjà été choquée d'apprendre que son mari s'apprêtait à présenter, sur les listes de son parti aux élections européennes, quelques plantureuses starlettes de la télévision. Le soir même, à 10 heures, elle envoie un courriel à l'agence de presse Ansa.

ATTAQUE SUR DEUX FRONTS

Veronica Berlusconi attaque sur deux fronts. Politique : "La présence de belles femmes en politique n'est ni un défaut ni une qualité, écrit-elle. Mais ce qui ressort aujourd'hui, c'est l'impudence et le manque de retenue du pouvoir qui porte atteinte à la crédibilité de toutes les femmes." Personnel : "Il n'est jamais venu à aucun des 18esanniversaires de ses enfants, quand bien même était-il invité."

De son côté, le chef du gouvernement dénonce "une manœuvre de la presse de gauche a laquelle Madame s'est laissé prendre". Noemi Letizia ? Une gamine qu'il connaît depuis toujours et qui ne serait autre que la fille d'un chauffeur de Bettino Craxi. Mais le propre fils de l'ancien président du conseil mort en exil dément : "Mon père n'a jamais eu de chauffeur du nom de Letizia." La presse fait ses choux gras de cette affaire privée. Celle de l'opposition soutient la première dame; les quotidiens de droite exaltent le machisme du président du conseil comme une preuve "d'italianité".

Entrée dans la vie du "Cavaliere" sous le nom de Veronica Lario, en 1980, Mme Berlusconi est toujours restée secrète. Interprète de seconds rôles, c'est en se produisant sur la scène du théâtre Manzoni à Milan qu'elle séduit Silvio Berlusconi, son aîné de vingt ans, marié et deux fois père. Dix ans et trois enfants plus tard, ils se marient, sous le régime de la séparation des biens. Très vite, leurs vies se séparent : physiquement, ils ne vivent pas sous le même toit; politiquement : elle ne soutient pas la guerre d'Irak, elle vote "oui" au référendum sur la procréation assistée. "Je n'ai jamais voté pour mon mari", dira-t-elle.

8 MILLIARDS D'EUROS EN JEU

Le temps ne fait rien à l'affaire : alors que M. Berlusconi s'obsède à donner les preuves de sa verdeur, elle rêve de "voyages sur les routes comme Chatwin et Kerouac". Il complimente une députée de son parti : "Avec vous, j'irais n'importe où." Elle exige et obtient des excuses publiques. A l'été 2008, ils tentent de jouer la fiction d'un couple réuni. Elle regarde ailleurs. A la rentrée, Silvio fréquente les night-clubs de Milan, elle assiste à l'université de Milan à la soutenance de maîtrise d'une de ses filles sur "la morale dans le capitalisme".

Derrière cette séparation, une autre pièce se joue : celle du contrôle de l'empire Finivest par les enfants des deux lits qui ne se fréquentent guère et que ce divorce éloigne un peu plus. Chacun détient 7,65 % du capital. Coalisés, les trois enfants de Veronica – Barbara, Eleonora et Luigi – pourraient mathématiquement prendre le contrôle de l'entreprise au détriment de Pierlsilvio et Marina, nés du premier mariage de M. Berlusconi.

Dans ce "Dynastie" à l'italienne, 8 milliards d'euros sont en jeu. Quant à Noemi Letizia, son portable ne répond plus. Même pour "Papounet" ?

Philippe Ridet
Article paru dans l'édition du 05.05.09.

Grippe porcine : l'OMS prête à passer au niveau 6 de son alerte - Le Monde, fr - link (aqui)

LEMONDE.FR avec Reuters et AFP | 04.05.09 | 11h27 • Mis à jour le 04.05.09 | 12h49

L'Organisation mondiale de la santé (OMS) va probablement porter son alerte pandémique à son degré maximal face à l'épidémie de grippe A (H1N1), déclare sa directrice générale, lundi 6 mai, dans El Pais. L'OMS est actuellement en phase d'alerte 5, qui caractérise une propagation interhumaine régionale.

Le niveau six ne signifie en aucune façon que nous sommes confrontés à la fin du monde. Il est important de le souligner clairement, sinon, lorsque nous annoncerons que nous passons au niveau six, cela provoquera une panique inutile", précise Margaret Chan. "Les virus de la grippe sont très imprévisibles, très trompeurs", ajoute-t-elle. "Nous ne devons pas tomber dans l'excès de confiance, nous ne devons pas laisser la possibilité au H1N1 de se recombiner avec d'autres virus", poursuit-elle pour justifier le niveau d'alerte de l'OMS.

Margaret Chan souligne que la stabilisation dans la propagation du virus de même que le nombre limité de cas ne doivent pas conduire à baisser la garde. L'hémisphère sud, indique-t-elle, va entrer dans l'hiver austral, période de l'année propice aux grippes saisonnières. "Nous devons être très prudents. Nul ne peut dire ce qui va se passer quand des pays de l'hémisphère sud connaîtront des pics épidémiques de grippe (saisonnière) et que cette nouvelle grippe arrivera", dit-elle.

Le Mexique se dit sur le point de maîtriser l'épidémie, et aux Etats-Unis aussi, les autorités se montrent prudemment optimistes, tout en mettant en garde contre une seconde vague à l'automne du virus sous une forme plus virulente.

Berlusconi veut des «excuses publiques» de sa femme - Libération, fr - link (aqui)

Le chef du gouvernement italien Silvio Berlusconi doute fortement d'une réconciliation avec son épouse Veronica et lui demande de s'excuser publiquement, dans une interview lundi, alors que les déboires conjugaux du couple font la une de la presse italienne. (© AFP Vincenzo Pinto)

04/05/2009 à 13h02
Le président du Conseil italien doute que son couple puisse être sauvé. Son épouse a annoncé ce week-end son intention de divorcer.

«Indigné», Silvio Berlusconi. Il estime même que son épouse est «tombée dans un piège tendu par les médias» et ajoute qu'il ne fera rien pour sauver son couple. Veronica Lario, mariée au «Cavaliere» depuis dix-neuf ans mais lassée de ses frasques incessantes, a annoncé ce week-end dans la presse italienne qu'elle allait engager une procédure de divorce.

Ce dimanche, Berlusconi avait préféré faire profil bas, évoquant «une affaire personnelle douloureuse, qui rentre dans la sphère du privé et dont il me semble bon de ne pas parler». Une stratégie vite oubliée, puisque le chef du gouvernement italien, 72 ans, passe à la contre-attaque aujourd'hui. Dans le Corriere della Sera, il juge peu probable que sa vie commune avec l'ancienne actrice puisse se poursuivre.

« Je ne le pense pas, je ne sais pas si je le souhaite cette fois. Veronica devrait me présenter des excuses publiques et je ne suis même pas sûr que cela suffirait », dit-il. « C'est la troisième fois qu'elle me fait une plaisanterie de ce genre pendant une campagne électorale. C'est vraiment trop », ajoute-t-il.

Selon le quotidien La Stampa, le chef du gouvernement aurait chargé ses avocats de gérer la situation et envisagerait de poursuivre en diffamation son épouse, de vingt ans sa cadette. Il explique également que le surnom de "papi", qui lui serait attribué par une jeune fille de 18 ans, est « une plaisanterie ».

Après sa fusion avec Chrysler, Fiat veut Opel - Libération, fr - link (aqui)

Une Jeep Wrangler (Chrysler) et une Fiat Panda, fin avril à Rome, après la fusion entre les deux constructeurs automobiles. (REUTERS)

04/05/2009 à 09h43
Le patron du constructeur italien doit discuter ce lundi à Berlin avec les ministres allemands de l'Economie et des Affaires étrangères de la reprise éventuelle des activités européennes de General Motors.

«D'un point de vue technique et industriel, c'est un mariage parfait». Le patron de Fiat ne cache pas son enthousiasme. Le groupe italien envisage la création d'un nouveau géant de l'automobile coté en Bourse qui rassemblerait sa branche automobile, sa part dans l'américain Chrysler et Opel, en cas de succès de son mariage avec le constructeur allemand.

Son patron Sergio Marchionne, qui vient de finaliser une alliance avec l'américain Chrysler, doit discuter ce lundi à Berlin avec les ministres allemands de l'Economie et des Affaires étrangères de la reprise éventuelle des activités européennes de General Motors Europe, dont le plus gros morceau est Opel.

Le conseil d'administration de Fiat a accordé «son soutien total aux initiatives qui doivent être prises au cours des prochaines semaines par l'administrateur délégué Sergio Marchionne afin d'étudier la viabilité d'une fusion des activités de Fiat Group Automobiles (dont sa part dans Chrysler) et de General Motors Europe dans une nouvelle société», a écrit le groupe dans un communiqué publié dimanche soir.

Un milliard d'économies par an

Une fusion avec les activités européennes de General Motors Europe «aboutirait à la création d'un groupe automobile d'un chiffre d'affaires annuel d'environ 80 milliards d'euros», annonce Fiat et devrait permettre des économies d'un milliard d'euros par an.

Avec 6 à 7 millions de véhicules produits par an, ce nouveau groupe serait parmi les premiers du secteur, derrière le numéro un mondial, le japonais Toyota, et à peu près au même niveau que l'allemand Volkswagen.

Le patron de Fiat espère finaliser la prise de contrôle d'Opel d'ici à la fin mai et introduire en Bourse le nouvel ensemble d'ici à la fin de l'été, a-t-il dit au Financial Times.

Mais l'affaire ne sera pas simple, nombre de responsables politiques et syndicaux étant hostiles à Fiat et lui préférant le groupe canadien d'équipement automobile Magna.

(Source AFP)

65% des Français "déçus" par Nicolas Sarkozy - Libération, fr - link (aqui)



04/05/2009 à 07h46

A la même période de leur premier mandat, Jacques Chirac recueillait 65% de "déçus" et 22% de "satisfaits" (1997) et François Mitterrand 54% de "déçus" et 30% de "satisfaits" (1983).

65% des Français se disent "déçus" par l'action de Nicolas Sarkozy depuis son élection et 63% jugent le bilan de ses deux premières années de quinquennat "plutôt négatif", selon un sondage TNS Sofres Logica à paraître lundi dans le quotidien gratuit Metro.

A la question "tout compte fait, êtes-vous satisfait ou déçu de l'action de Nicolas Sarkozy depuis son élection en mai 2007", 65% des sondés répondent "déçu", 24% "satisfait" et 11% "sans opinion".

55% des sympathisants de droite se disent "satisfait" et 37% "déçu", 84% des sympathisants de gauche se disant "déçus" pour 8% de "satisfaits".

Selon le comparatif de l'institut de sondage, à la même période de leur premier mandat, Jacques Chirac recueillait 65% de "déçus" et 22% de "satisfaits" (1997) et François Mitterrand 54% de "déçus" et 30% de "satisfaits" (1983).

A la question "voici deux ans que Nicolas Sarkozy a été élu président de la République. Dans l'ensemble, diriez-vous que le bilan de son action est...", 63% répondent "plutôt négatif" et 28% "plutôt positif", 9% se déclarant sans opinion.

Pour 60% des sympathisants de droite le bilan est "plutôt positif" et "plutôt négatif" pour 34%, alors que 85% des sympathisants de gauche le jugent "plutôt négatif" et 12% "plutôt positif".

A la même période de leur mandat, le bilan de Jacques Chirac était jugé "plutôt négatif" par 64%, "plutôt positif" par 27% (1997), celui de François Mitterrand à 50% "plutôt négatif" contre 37% "plutôt positif" (1983) et celui de Valéry Giscard d'Estaing "plutôt positif" par 44% contre 42% "plutôt négatif" (1976), selon l'historique de l'institut.

Enquête réalisée les 23 et 24 avril en face à face au domicile des personnes interrogées, sur un échantillon national de 1.000 personnes représentatif de l'ensemble de la population âgée de 18 ans et plus.

(Source AFP)

Révélations sur l'oreille coupée de Van Gogh - Le Figaro, fr - link (aqui)

Autoportrait de Van Gogh. ((1887/88) (AFP/Van Gogh Museum) Crédits photo : AFP

Éric Biétry-Rivierre
04/05/2009 | Mise à jour : 10:46

Deux universitaires allemands reviennent sur la plus fameuse dispute de l'histoire de l'art. Ce serait Gauguin qui aurait coupé l'oreille du Hollandais.

Au matin du 24 décembre 1888, la police d'Arles récupère un homme au visage sanguinolent et le conduit à l'hôpital. Au cours d'une crise, Van Gogh s'est coupé l'oreille gauche (à droite dans ses autoportraits au miroir ultérieurs) au moyen d'une lame de rasoir. Cette automutilation serait le symptôme d'une santé mentale déjà défaillante et le signe avant-coureur du suicide perpétré sept mois plus tard. C'est du moins la thèse dominante.

Dans les années 1930, Georges Bataille et Antonin Artaud voient dans le geste une portée sacrificielle et valorisent la folie comme fon­damentale pour l'art moderne. Puis le cinéma contribue à établir cette sombre veille d'un jour de Noël en moment culte, en épisode charnière de l'histoire de l'art. Dans son film de 1956, Lust for Life, Vincente Minnelli ne montre pas l'acte mais c'est bien Kirk Douglas (Vincent) qui le ­commet.

Reste qu'il n'y a jamais vraiment eu d'unanimité parmi ceux qui se sont plongés dans les maigres sources du fait divers. Et un livre qui vient de sortir en Allemagne devrait accroître le doute. Selon ses auteurs, Hans Kaufmann et Rita Wildegans, deux universitaires de Hambourg, c'est Gauguin qui aurait porté un coup de sabre (excellent escrimeur, il était maître d'armes civiles) lors de la fameuse dispute. Van Gogh n'aurait rien dit pour protéger son ami. Cela expliquerait le retour à Paris précipité de Gauguin après une brève audition par la police où il s'était montré cohérent contrairement à un Van Gogh prostré. Et peut-être ses envies de lointains…

L'essai charge cet « hypocrite », ce « vaniteux ». Il aurait fui après son geste malheureux, simplement censé faire reculer Van Gogh. Il aurait jeté sa rapière dans le Rhône. On ne l'a jamais retrouvée. « Le rasoir non plus », note Hans Kaufmann. « Une chose est sûre, la version admise repose surtout sur les souvenirs de Gauguin, Avant et Après, parus en 1903 », poursuit-il. Selon eux, le conflit portait sur des questions artistiques. Dès son arrivée à l'invitation de Van Gogh dans la maison jaune de la place Lamartine (démolie durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale) et les premiers projets menés de conserve, l'ambiance s'était tendue. Van Gogh considérait par exemple sa version de l'allée des Alyscamps, peinte sur un support de jute préconisé par Gauguin mais auquel lui n'était pas habitué, comme ratée.

Le remords de Caïn dans la tombe ?

Sur quoi une première colère aurait éclaté. Puis une seconde dans l'atelier commun, cette soirée du 23, parce que l'un soutenait que l'on peut créer selon sa fantaisie et l'autre uniquement d'après la nature. Gauguin avait menacé de partir, Van Gogh a vu d'un coup ruinés ses espoirs de recréer sous le soleil du Sud un nouveau Pont-Aven. Il aurait saisi un couteau. Gauguin aurait filé et passé la nuit à l'hôtel. Une fois seul, Van Gogh aurait donc procédé à la vivisection, enveloppé son lobe dans du papier journal et, vers 23 h 30, l'aurait confié à une prostituée de sa connaissance avant de revenir se coucher chez lui.

Insensé ou improbable ? Quoi qu'il en soit, c'est dans sa couche ensanglantée, à demi inanimé, que la police, informée des faits par le voisinage ou la maison de tolérance, le trouva le lendemain. Hans Kaufmann et Rita Wildegans reprennent le rapport de police, les quelques notes de la presse locale et passent au peigne fin les témoignages malheureusement très postérieurs aux faits. Et suggèrent une cause plus triviale. Il est question d'une bagarre « à propos d'une certaine Rachel » qui se serait poursuivie jusque devant un bordel situé trois cents mètres plus loin. Ils estiment que si la provocation vient de l'un c'est sûrement l'autre qui blesse.

Gauguin en aurait longtemps eu mauvaise conscience. Peu de temps après la mort de son ex-ami qu'il n'a jamais revu, il se rend à Tahiti. En 1901, il y peint des tournesols sur un fauteuil. Un hommage caché ? En son centre la fleur semble un œil fixant le spectateur. Le remords de Caïn dans la tombe ?

Au Van Gogh Museum d'Amsterdam, Louis van Tilborgh, en charge de la recherche scientifique sur le peintre, maintient la thèse de l'automutilation. À Bâle où vient de s'ouvrir une grande exposition sur les paysages du Hollandais, et où Hans Kaufmann et Rita Wildegans viendront défendre leur scénario le 17 juin prochain, la commissaire Nina Zimmer tempère : « Ils ont peut-être raison, mais toutes les hypothèses se valent vu le manque d'éléments. »

L'Amérique rend son verdict sur les banques - Le Figaro, fr - link (aqui)

Des records de pertes pour les établissements financiers aux Etats-Unis.

Pierre-Yves Dugua
04/05/2009 | Mise à jour : 10:26

Le Trésor américain va publier les résultats d'un test sur la capacité des 19 plus grandes banques du pays à résister à une éventuelle chute des prix immobiliers et à une hausse du chômage.

Avec un peu de chance on saura jeudi soir quelles grandes banques américaines sont jugées potentiellement sous-capitalisées. Le Trésor américain envisage de publier le 7 mai, après la clôture de Wall Street, les résultats de plusieurs semaines d'analyse approfondie de la capacité des 19 plus grandes banques des États-Unis à résister à deux scénarios de récession. Elles représentent collectivement les deux tiers des actifs bancaires américains et plus de la moitié des prêts. Deux d'entre elles ne sont même pas des banques : il s'agit de GMAC, la filiale de crédit de General Motors, et de Met Life, la plus grande compagnie d'assurance-vie du pays.

L'exercice est censé faire la lumière sur la vulnérabilité de certains établissements à une éventuelle aggravation de la chute des prix immobiliers et du chômage. De cette lumière sont supposés découler, au besoin, des plans de recapitalisation conçus pour rassurer les investisseurs et le public. Pour le moment, le contraire s'est produit : certaines banques contestent les conclusions et les hypothèses de dévalorisation d'actifs retenues par les experts de la Réserve fédérale.

Pour éviter tout risque de panique bancaire, le Trésor a repoussé à plusieurs reprises la publication de ces résultats. Au lieu de dédramatiser un exercice qui devrait être routinier, la controverse a pris de l'ampleur après des fuites sur les résultats initiaux des tests. La presse fait état d'un besoin invérifiable de Citigroup de lever 10 milliards de dollars de fonds propres. Bank of America, Wells Fargo et Regions Financial Corp. feraient partie d'autres institutions épinglées.

«Il ne s'agit pas de tests de solvabilité. Aujourd'hui toutes les banques sont suffisamment capitalisées», soulignent les responsables du Trésor et de la Fed qui se retrouvent depuis plus d'une semaine obligés de négocier avec les établissements les plus vulnérables. Ces derniers ne manquent pas d'arguments. Citigroup, par exemple, veut que l'on tienne compte du fruit de la vente récente de sa maison de courtage japonaise pour 7,9 milliards de dollars. D'autres, comme Wells Fargo, défendent la qualité de leurs prêts. Le débat porte aussi sur la prise en compte de leurs provisions déjà constituées, sur l'appréciation de leurs risques hors bilan et sur leur capacité à générer des profits dans les prochains mois.

Six mois pour leverdes fonds propres

Les banques semblent bien résister au scénario économique de base. Il porte sur une contraction de 2 % du PIB des États-Unis cette année avec une chute de 14 % des prix immobiliers. Le scénario plus dur d'une contraction de 3, 3 % cette année, suivi de seulement 0, 5 % de croissance l'an prochain avec une poussée du chômage à 10, 3 %, poserait problème. De même que la focalisation des régulateurs sur un critère de capitalisation plus exigeant que d'ordinaire.

La Fed ne vise plus simplement un noyau dur de fonds propres (Tier 1) de 6 % des actifs pondérés en fonction de leurs risques. Elle teste aussi les banques sur leur « tangible common equity » (TCE) qui exclut le capital intangible. On mesure ainsi ce qu'il resterait vraiment aux actionnaires ordinaires de la banque si tous les actifs étaient liquidés. En insistant sur un ratio de TCE de 4 % des actifs pondérés en fonction de leurs risques, nombre de banques sont moins solides qu'il y paraît. Les banques potentiellement sous-capitalisées disposeront de six mois pour lever des fonds propres. Soit auprès des marchés privés, soit en vendant des actifs. À défaut, elles pourront convertir en actions ordinaires tout ou partie de leurs actions préférentielles, notamment celles auxquelles le Trésor a déjà souscrit. L'État fédéral verrait ainsi monter sa part dans le capital des banques les plus fragiles, mais resterait, semble-t-il, au-dessous de 50 %.

Trente faillites de banque cette année contre vingt-cinq en 2008

L'agence fédérale américaine de garantie des dépôts bancaires (FDIC) a annoncé vendredi la plus grande faillite d'un établissement de dépôts de l'année, celle de la Silverton Bank, une banque de Georgie (sud-est des États-Unis) qui contrôle 4,1 milliards de dollars d'actifs. Cette faillite porte leur nombre dans le pays à trente cette année, alors qu'il y en avait eu vingt-cinq sur l'ensemble de l'année dernière, et seulement trois en 2007. La FDIC a indiqué ne pas avoir trouvé de repreneur pour la Silverton Bank, qui n'avait pas parmi ses clients de particuliers, mais " était une banque pour les professionnels qui fournissait des services de mise en relation à ses clients, des banques ". Les autorités ont donc créé une nouvelle structure qui a repris l'ensemble des actifs et des 3,3 milliards de dollars de dépôts, et doit permettre " aux banques clientes de maintenir les services avec le moins de perturbations possible ". Le coût de ce sinistre pour les comptes de l'agence fédérale américaine de garantie des dépôts bancaires (FDIC) a été estimé à 1,3 milliard de dollars. Silverton Bank, qui avait son siège à Atlanta mais avait 1 400 banques clientes dans quarante quatre États américains, est le sixième établissement de Georgie à faire faillite cette année.

Grippe : deux nouveaux cas confirmés en France - Le Figaro, fr - link (aqui)

Des médecins équipés de combinaisons spéciales, dimanche, dans un hôpital de Mexico. Crédits photo : AP

Par la rédaction du figaro.fr, avec AFP et AP
04/05/2009 | Mise à jour : 12:45

Alors que l'OMS évoque le risque d'une deuxième vague de l'épidémie, le président mexicain se veut optimiste et envisage une reprise de l'activité économique mercredi. Le bilan est désormais de 23 morts dont 22 au Mexique.

L'OMS avertit. La grippe A (H1N1) pourrait décliner avant de refaire surface avec une virulence sans précédent . C'est ce qu'affirme lundi la directrice générale de l'Organisation mondiale de la santé, Margaret Chan, dans un entretien au Financial Times. Si le taux de mortalité du virus semble se stabiliser, explique-t-elle, une seconde vague pourrait frapper en apportant sa «vengeance». «Si cela se produisait, cela serait la pire des épidémies que le monde aurait à affronter au 21e siècle». «Je ne prédis pas l'apparition d'une pandémie, mais si je passe à côté et que nous ne sommes pas préparés, alors j'aurais failli à ma tâche. L'OMS va probablement porter son alerte pandémique à son degré maximal (6 contre 5 actuellement), ajoute Margaret Chan dans une interview au quotidien espagnol El Pais.

Alors que l'épidémie de grippe a fait jusqu'à présent 26 morts (25 au Mexique et un aux Etats-Unis) et s'est propagée à 20 pays, le Mexique, foyer d'origine du virus, se veut désormais optimiste. «Nous sommes en condition de surmonter cette situation d'urgence», a déclaré le président Calderon lors d'un entretien télévisé. «Nous avons pu limiter ou du moins réduire la vitesse de propagation du virus», a-t-il ajouté, affirmant que les autorités avaient «correctement» géré la crise. L'activité économique, paralysée depuis plus d'une semaine, devrait reprendre à partir de mercredi, a-t-il annoncé. Enfin Felipe Calderon a vivement dénoncé les mesures de «discrimination» prises à l'encontre des ressortissants mexicains en raison de l'épidémie. «Certains pays ou endroits prennent des mesures discriminatoires par ignorance ou désinformation», a souligné Calderon sans désigner un pays en particulier.

Aux Etats-Unis aussi, les autorités se sont montrées prudemment optimistes, tout en mettant en garde contre une seconde vague à l'automne du virus sous une forme plus virulente.

Selon des chiffres rendus publics par l'OMS lundi, le cap des mille malades a été franchi. Les pays les plus touchés sont, sur 1033 cas confirmés dans le monde, le Mexique (590 cas), les États-Unis (245), le Canada (101). L'Espagne, avec 44 cas, est le pays européen le plus atteint.

Zone dédiée à Roissy

En France, la ministre de la Santé Roselyne Bachelot a annoncé lundi matin deux nouveaux cas avérés de grippe, un homme de 23 ans et une femme de 24 ans, qui ont tous les deux séjourné au Mexique. «Le bilan exact est donc ce matin de huit cas probables, et de quatre cas confirmés». «Ces deux personnes vont bien et nous notons un état favorable de leur état», a ajouté Roselyne Bachelot, indiquant qu'elles «sont hospitalisées à l'hôpital de La Pitié-Salpêtrière». Le directeur général de la Santé Didier Houssin avait évoqué dimanche soir 28 cas «possibles» dont huit «probables».

Le pays continue par ailleurs à se préparer à l'éventualité d'une pandémie, en érigeant des «barrières». Ainsi, à partir de mardi, les avions en provenance du Mexique arriveront à l'aéroport de Roissy dans une zone dédiée, afin d'éviter les contacts avec les autres voyageurs et réduire les risques de propagation, a annoncé le ministère de l'Intérieur. Ce week-end, des bagagistes d'Orly ont refusé de décharger des avions arrivant du Mexique et d'Espagne, par peur d'être infectés. Le gouvernement va lancer mardi une campagne d'information pour rappeler les bons gestes : «se laver les mains plusieurs fois par jour, tousser et éternuer dans un mouchoir en papier qu'on jette... et on ne va pas chez son médecin dans une salle d'attente, ni aux urgences: on appelle le 15!» en cas de suspection de grippe A, a rappelé dimanche Roselyne Bachelot, ministre de la Santé.

» Voir les mesures prises en France

La carte de la pandémie :

Avec FluTracker